To read this content please select one of the options below:

Aerodynamic discrepancies of high-speed trains meeting within two types noise barriers: considering modeling scale ratio

Wei-Chao Yang (School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China and National Engineering Research Center of High-speed Railway Construction Technology (Hong Kong Branch), Hong Kong, China)
Guo-Zhi Li (School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Shenzhen Research Institute, Shenzhen, China)
E Deng (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China; National Rail Transit Electrification and Automation Engineering Technology Research Center (Hong Kong Branch), Hong Kong, China and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Shenzhen Research Institute, Shenzhen, China)
De-Hui Ouyang (School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China; National Rail Transit Electrification and Automation Engineering Technology Research Center (Hong Kong Branch), Hong Kong, China; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Shenzhen Research Institute, Shenzhen, China)
Zhi-Peng Lu (China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co Ltd, Wuhan, China and National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Underwater Tunnel Technology, Wuhan, China)

International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow

ISSN: 0961-5539

Article publication date: 25 July 2024

Issue publication date: 4 September 2024

70

Abstract

Purpose

Sustainable urban rail transit requires noise barriers. However, these barriers’ durability varies due to the differing aerodynamic impacts they experience. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the aerodynamic discrepancies of trains when they meet within two types of rectangular noise barriers: fully enclosed (FERNB) and semi-enclosed with vertical plates (SERNBVB). The research also considers the sensitivity of the scale ratio in these scenarios.

Design/methodology/approach

A 1:16 scaled moving model test analyzed spatiotemporal patterns and discrepancies in aerodynamic pressures during train meetings. Three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics models, with scale ratios of 1:1, 1:8 and 1:16, used the improved delayed detached eddy simulation turbulence model and slip grid technique. Comparing scale ratios on aerodynamic pressure discrepancies between the two types of noise barriers and revealing the flow field mechanism were done. The goal is to establish the relationship between aerodynamic pressure at scale and in full scale.

Findings

The aerodynamic pressure on SERNBVB is influenced by the train’s head and tail waves, whereas for FERNB, it is affected by pressure wave and head-tail waves. Notably, SERNBVB's aerodynamic pressure is more sensitive to changes in scale ratio. As the scale ratio decreases, the aerodynamic pressure on the noise barrier gradually increases.

Originality/value

A train-meeting moving model test is conducted within the noise barrier. Comparison of aerodynamic discrepancies during train meets between two types of rectangular noise barriers and the relationship between the scale and the full scale are established considering the modeling scale ratio.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52308419), the Science and Technology Research and Development Program Project of China railway group limited (Grant Nos. Major Project, 2021-Major-01; Major Project, 2022-Key-22), the Innovation and Technology Commission of the Hong Kong SAR Government (Grant No. K-BBY1), and the Science and Technology Research and Development Program Project of China railway (Grant No. N2022G031).

Credit authorship contribution statement: W.-C.Y.: funding acquisition, conceptualization, writing-review and editing; G.-Z.L.: investigation, software, validation, writing-original draft; ED.: funding acquisition, methodology, data curation, writing-review and editing, supervision; D.-H.O.: writing-review and editing; Z.-P.L.: writing-review and editing.

Declaration of competing interest: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Citation

Yang, W.-C., Li, G.-Z., Deng, E., Ouyang, D.-H. and Lu, Z.-P. (2024), "Aerodynamic discrepancies of high-speed trains meeting within two types noise barriers: considering modeling scale ratio", International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, Vol. 34 No. 9, pp. 3393-3415. https://doi.org/10.1108/HFF-02-2024-0153

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles