TY  - JOUR
AB  - Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explain to readers how intelligent systems can fail and how artificial intelligence (AI) safety is different from cybersecurity. The goal of cybersecurity is to reduce the number of successful attacks on the system; the goal of AI Safety is to make sure zero attacks succeed in bypassing the safety mechanisms. Unfortunately, such a level of performance is unachievable. Every security system will eventually fail; there is no such thing as a 100 per cent secure system.Design/methodology/approach AI Safety can be improved based on ideas developed by cybersecurity experts. For narrow AI Safety, failures are at the same, moderate level of criticality as in cybersecurity; however, for general AI, failures have a fundamentally different impact. A single failure of a superintelligent system may cause a catastrophic event without a chance for recovery.Findings In this paper, the authors present and analyze reported failures of artificially intelligent systems and extrapolate our analysis to future AIs. The authors suggest that both the frequency and the seriousness of future AI failures will steadily increase.Originality/value This is a first attempt to assemble a public data set of AI failures and is extremely valuable to AI Safety researchers.
VL  - 21
IS  - 1
SN  - 1463-6689
DO  - 10.1108/FS-04-2018-0034
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-04-2018-0034
AU  - Yampolskiy Roman V.
PY  - 2018
Y1  - 2018/01/01
TI  - Predicting future AI failures from historic examples
T2  - foresight
PB  - Emerald Publishing Limited
SP  - 138
EP  - 152
Y2  - 2024/09/21
ER  -