Labour-related factors affecting construction productivity in Sri Lankan building projects: perspectives of engineers and managers

Kesavan Manoharan (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka) (Department of Construction Technology, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Kuliyapitiya, Sri Lanka)
Pujitha Dissanayake (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka)
Chintha Pathirana (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka)
Dharsana Deegahawature (Department of Industrial Management, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Kuliyapitiya, Sri Lanka)
Renuka Silva (Centre for Quality Assurance, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Kuliyapitiya, Sri Lanka)

Frontiers in Engineering and Built Environment

ISSN: 2634-2499

Article publication date: 18 July 2022

Issue publication date: 8 November 2022

4123

Abstract

Purpose

Past studies highlight a wide range of labour-related problems resulting in productivity loss in the construction industry of many developing countries. This study aims to quantify the impacts of labour-related factors on the productivity of construction operations in Sri Lankan building projects based on the viewpoint of engineers and construction managers for upgrading management/organisational policies and practices.

Design/methodology/approach

Qualitative and quantitative approaches were used to identify the critical factors. Further, a series of industry consultative discussions were conducted through problem-based communication approaches to analyse the actions required.

Findings

A total of 21 factors were determined as critical, where skills shortage, labourers’ thinking abilities, work experience, knowledge in construction works and discipline were leading in the list. The statistical tests and the experts’ discussion outcomes ensured the validity and reliability of the study findings.

Research limitations/implications

The study outcomes will contribute to finding out better ways for directing labour in the industry practices and revising organisational policies towards achieving higher productivity levels in construction operations. Though the study findings are limited to the Sri Lankan context, some findings may be tested in other developing countries in similar scenarios.

Originality/value

The study findings show why the identified factors are critical, how those influence construction practices and what actions need to be considered for addressing the industry’s productivity-related challenges. These can play a key role in upgrading the construction management practices and organisational policies to the near-future stages.

Keywords

Citation

Manoharan, K., Dissanayake, P., Pathirana, C., Deegahawature, D. and Silva, R. (2022), "Labour-related factors affecting construction productivity in Sri Lankan building projects: perspectives of engineers and managers", Frontiers in Engineering and Built Environment, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 218-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/FEBE-03-2022-0009

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Kesavan Manoharan, Pujitha Dissanayake, Chintha Pathirana, Dharsana Deegahawature and Renuka Silva

License

Published in Frontiers in Engineering and Built Environment. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode


1. Introduction and literature review

The construction industry plays a significant role in infrastructure development and its facilities in a country, and it makes a major contribution to the development of the national economy in a country (Halwatura, 2015). The construction sector accounts for a considerable proportion of gross domestic product (GDP) in different countries – for instance, 9% in Oman, 6.1% in the UK and 5.5% in Japan (Umar, 2021). When it comes to Sri Lanka, the consultations with the Construction Industry Development Authority (CIDA) highlight that 6% of GDP is accounted to the construction sector. Umar (2021) further state that the rapid growth of the construction industry in many developing countries like Sri Lanka has created a large number of jobs for different labour categories, which is expected to be further rising up for the next some years.

Labour is the most valuable asset in the construction industry since it combines all other resources in various construction tasks (Ghate and Minde, 2016). The labour costs contribute in a range of 30–50% of total project costs in a typical construction project (Shahab and Audrius, 2018). Hence, the productivity improvement in labour operations is crucial to construction firms for their successful long run in the industry (Ghate and Minde, 2016). In many developing countries, the construction industry has been experiencing productivity loss which affects the physical progress of construction projects (Ghoddousi et al., 2015; Nourhane et al., 2018; Silva et al., 2018). Many studies report that a wide range of labour-related problems are the major components that lead to productivity loss in construction operations (Soham and Rajiv, 2013; Onyekachi, 2018; Dinh and Nguyen, 2019; Murari and Joshi, 2019). Notably, poor labour productivity was identified as one of the significant factors that caused construction delays in Oman (Umar, 2018).

Labour skill shortages have been the problems for the construction firms that significantly affect the performance of labour leading to a low productivity level of construction operations (Chigara and Moyo, 2014; Shashank et al., 2014; Ghoddousi et al., 2015; Ghate and Minde, 2016; Nourhane et al., 2018; Onyekachi, 2018). Studies reveal that the lack of work experience of labourers has been one of the major reasons for the labour skill shortages in the construction industry (Robles et al., 2014; Dharani, 2015; Nourhane et al., 2018; Silva et al., 2018; Dinh and Nguyen, 2019; Murari and Joshi, 2019). Along with the lack of work experience, it has also been found that labourers’ poor education background and poor training facilities significantly influence the labour skills (Windapo, 2016; Orando and Isabirye, 2018; Silva et al., 2018; Mistri et al., 2019). Due to the skill shortages, unskilled labourers work as skilled labourers in construction projects in many countries (Saurav et al., 2017; Onyekachi, 2018; Shahab and Audrius, 2018), including Sri Lanka (Fernando et al., 2016; Silva et al., 2018).

Studies reveal that the physical abilities of labourers affected the productivity of construction operations in many construction projects in India (Soham and Rajiv, 2013; Shashank et al., 2014; Dharani, 2015), Indonesia (Soekiman et al., 2011), Iran (Shahab and Audrius, 2018) and Vietnam (Dinh and Nguyen, 2019). The ageing workforce is highlighted as the major reason for the problems related to the physical abilities of labourers (Kaya et al., 2014; Shashank et al., 2014; Windapo, 2016; Onyekachi, 2018; Mistri et al., 2019). Studies affirm that the physical abilities of labourers are also affected due to the excessive workload of labourers (Hughes and Thorpe, 2014; Mistri et al., 2019).

Umar et al. (2018a) have assessed the health profile and body pain of 30 construction workers from Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries and revealed that the majority of them were having the problems related to excessive body weight, whereas the blood pressure of 43.3% of them was more than the threshold and fall under the hypertension values. Notably, it was identified that more than 45% of them had been experiencing body pain, especially in their neck, shoulder, lower back, leg and knees for some months. Umar et al. (2018a) have identified that sleeping hours have a major influence on the pain experience of workers.

The health problems and the use of alcohol/drugs amongst labourers have been identified as the significant factors affecting labour productivity in the Indian construction industry (Mistri et al., 2019). The excessive use of alcohol/drugs was also identified that significantly affected the performance of labourers in many construction projects in Indonesia (Soekiman et al., 2011). The health problems have a significant impact on the labourers’ ability to adapt to the changes in the working environment (Robles et al., 2014). Studies identified that the psychological and economic problems of labourers influenced their performance in construction activities in India (Dharani, 2015) and Turkey (Kazaz et al., 2016). Shashank et al. (2014) stated that the personal problems of labourers also had a significant impact on the labour performance in many construction sites in India.

Having a good understanding amongst workers reduces labour injuries and builds project safety and quality (Kesavan et al., 2014). Notably, International Labour Organization (2015) indicates the deaths of more than a 100,000 construction workers every year due to different occupational safety and health conditions, whereas this is nearly 30% of all occupational deadly injuries. Considering the construction sector of Oman, Umar et al. (2018b) report that the major portion of work-related injuries has arisen from road traffic accidents followed by slipping and falling of workers and then getting crammed between solid objects. Umar and Egbu (2017) reveal that a significant proportion of accidents arising from the workers’ faults compared with the factors related to equipment, materials, environment and management.

It has been found that labour discipline needs to be improved in the construction industry in many countries (Dharani, 2015; Orando and Isabirye, 2018; Dinh and Nguyen, 2019). Lack of labour morale/commitment was identified in Indian (Saurav et al., 2017) and Nigerian (Onyekachi, 2018) construction sectors. Hickson and Ellis (2013) revealed that the late arrival, early quit and frequent unscheduled breaks significantly affected the productivity of labour operations in many construction projects in Trinidad and Tobago. Studies reported that the Egyptian labourers spend much time for unnecessary talks, eating and drinking, and this significantly influenced the productivity of labour operations in construction (Shehata and El-Gohary, 2011; Nourhane et al., 2018).

Overall, the current study has reviewed the past studies that focussed on the labour-related problems affecting the productivity of construction operations in different contexts in the last decade (from 2010 to 2020). The potential research articles were selected by examining the titles, abstracts and keywords (related to the terms “construction”, “labour”, “performance” and “productivity”) in popular online search engines “Google Scholar, ResearchGate and Scopus” and library facilities. The titles and keywords of the articles were carefully studied. The recommendations from subject matter experts were also considered in the selection of research articles. The information was extracted from the selected articles considering the needs and current practices in developing countries like Sri Lanka. Table 1 illustrates the mapping of the identified significant labour-related factors affecting construction productivity with the recent studies from different contexts of some developing countries.

1.1 Sri Lankan context

In the Sri Lankan construction industry, a few studies have investigated the labour-related factors affecting construction productivity. Widanagamachchi (2013) revealed that difficulties in understanding technical drawings, the temporary nature of the job, hardworking environment and lack of social recognition were the major reasons for the lack of motivation amongst the Sri Lankan labourers in construction projects. The labourers’ inability in understanding drawings was also highlighted by Praveen et al. (2011), along with their improper material handling skills as the problems for the Sri Lankan construction contractors. Kesavan et al. (2015) highlighted that the shortage of labourers, personal conflicts amongst labourers, low motivation and morale of labourers, slow mobilisation of labourers, unqualified/inadequate experience of labourers and labourer injuries were the major labour-related issues in the Sri Lankan construction projects. Poor cognitive and job-specific technical skills of the Sri Lankan labourers have been highlighted by the Construction Industry Sector Council of Sri Lanka as serious problems against improving labour productivity in the Sri Lankan construction industry (TVEC, 2017). Though the industry feels that the physical progress of construction operations is significantly affected due to the above-discussed labour-related problems, most organisations do not take the necessary steps to address those problems appropriately in the Sri Lankan construction industry (Fernando et al., 2016). Furthermore, a series of interviews conducted by Manoharan et al. (2020) amongst 50 Sri Lankan construction experts working in different job categories have revealed that most construction organisations do not adequately address labour-related issues in the Sri Lankan construction industry.

1.2 Importance of this study

Overall, studies highlight the essential need for the construction industry in many developing countries to address a wide range of labour-related problems towards improving the productivity of construction operations. Considering the Sri Lankan construction sector, the consultations with the CIDA reveal that many construction firms have higher investments for the construction of buildings than other types. According to Human Capital Index (2019), hundreds of thousands of labourers are working in building construction projects in Sri Lanka (Central Bank of Sri Lanka, 2019). The engineers and construction managers are the experts who can play a central role in decision-making processes at the organisational level. Considering these aspects, this study intends to quantify the impact levels of labour-related factors on the productivity of construction operations in the Sri Lankan building construction projects in the current scenario based on the perspectives of engineers and construction managers. This will be beneficial to the construction industry in many developing countries for upgrading their organisational policies and management practices against labour-related problems.

2. Methodology

The study methodology included both qualitative and quantitative approaches to determine the significant labour-related factors affecting the productivity of building construction operations based on the perspectives of engineers and construction managers. The study also included comprehensive approaches to test the validity and reliability of the findings. The following sections describe those.

2.1 Qualitative analysis

The thematic analysis method was applied to the data collected from the literature review to qualitatively identify the significant labour-related factors influencing construction productivity. Thematic analysis is a recognised approach that can be used to investigate the views, opinions, knowledge, experiences or values of respondents from a set of qualitative data (Caulfield, 2019). The common themes, topics, ideas and patterns that come up repeatedly were examined in the collected data using this method.

2.2 Questionnaire survey

A questionnaire survey was carried out amongst 90 Sri Lankan construction firms where an engineer or construction manager represented each respective firm to respond to the survey questions based on their current practices in building construction projects. The design of the questionnaire consisted of two sections (Section A and Section B), where Section A covered the respondents’ background and Section B included the labour-related factors shown in Table 1. The survey respondents were instructed to indicate the impact levels of each factor on construction productivity based on a Likert scale of five ordinal measures from 1 to 5 (very low effect to very high effect). The designed questionnaires were validated through cognitive interviews conducted amongst some engineers/managers.

Only the upper graded contractors registered in the CIDA of Sri Lanka were considered for this survey since most of the major projects are executed by such contractors in the country. In Sri Lanka, CIDA is the recognised body that provides the contractors’ registration with suitable grades for the construction field. According to the National Registration and Grading Scheme for Construction Contractors of CIDA, the construction contractors are categorised into 11 grades based on their financial capacity, technical ability and the experience gained in the field. Here, the upper graded contractors are the construction firms who have a minimum C4 grade of CIDA registration, and the minimum financial limit to obtain this grade is 50m Sri Lankan Rupees. When the survey began, a total of 450 construction contractors had the CIDA registration with the grade C4 or above. Here, the list included the contractors who are involved in road/highway projects, bridge projects, water supply and sewerage works, irrigation and drainage works, dredging and reclamation too. Considering the difficulties in deciding the actual sample size of contractors who are involved in building construction projects, as recommended by Showkat and Parveen (2017), the snowball sampling method was used to find the building contractors for this questionnaire survey. The snowball sampling method is an approach of expanding the sample size through a small population of known individual survey participants from the initial stage of the survey.

Figure 1 shows the detailed profile of survey respondents based on their CIDA grades and work experience in the building construction field. The highest percentage of contractors was in the C4 grade. Referring to their work experience in the construction field, the majority was in the range of 5–10 years, whereas 98% had more than 5 years of work experience, as well as 58%, 35% and 23% had a minimum of 10, 15 and 20 years of work experience, respectively.

2.3 Quantitative analysis

The quantitative approaches are more scientific and make the data in a numeric form which is easier to interpret (Dinh and Nguyen, 2019). The Relative Importance Index (RII) method was applied to measure the impact levels of the factors on the productivity of construction operations. As recommended by past studies (Shahab and Audrius, 2018; Dinh and Nguyen, 2019), Equation (1) was used to calculate RII values.

(1)RII=WA  *  N
  1. W represents the weight assigned to each factor by response ranges (1 – very low, 2 – low, 3 – moderate, 4 – high and 5 – very high);

  2. A represents the maximum weight given (A equals 5) and

  3. N represents the total number of responses.

The higher RII value illustrates that the corresponding factor has a high impact on the productivity of construction operations. As per the recommendations of previous studies (Shanmuganathan et al., 2014; Manoharan et al., 2020), the minimum RII value to decide the corresponding factor as critical was 0.7. To test the reliability and validity of the results, the Coefficient of Variation (CV) values were calculated for each factor. The CV value is defined as the ratio between standard deviation and RII values (Solly and Gezani, 2017). According to Statistics Canada (2020), a CV value of less than 0.3 ensures the reliability of the result for each factor.

2.4 Industry consultative meetings and workshops

A series of meetings and industry consultative workshops were conducted amongst construction experts from various working categories, and the results were discussed to determine suitable mitigation measures that need to be taken in the organisational/management practices. The problem-based communication approaches were mainly used in the discussion sessions, and the results were validated through these discussion outcomes. The problem-based communication approaches are very useful for understanding the issues, exchanging information, generating ideas and finding solutions (Manoharan et al., 2021a).

3. Results and discussion

Based on the perspectives of engineers and construction managers, the impact levels of labour-related factors on the productivity of construction operations are shown in Table 2. Amongst those 32 factors, 21 factors were determined as critical based on their RII values (more than 0.7). Skills shortage, lack of thinking abilities, lack of working experience, lack of knowledge in construction works and poor discipline were found in the top five ranking list. This section discusses those leading factors compared with the previous findings in Sri Lankan and other foreign contexts, also describing the reasons for the current status of those factors, how those are linked with other factors and the required actions in the industry activities.

3.1 Lack of skills and work experience amongst labourers

The study reports that the skills shortage and lack of work experience of labourers significantly affect the performance, productivity and quality of work operations in building construction projects in Sri Lanka. The skills shortage and lack of work experience of labourers have also been the major problems amongst the construction contractors in many countries, namely Egypt (Nourhane et al., 2018), India (Dharani, 2015; Ghate and Minde, 2016; Murari and Joshi, 2019), Iran (Ghoddousi et al., 2015), Nigeria (Onyekachi, 2018), South Africa (Windapo, 2016; Orando and Isabirye, 2018), Vietnam (Dinh and Nguyen, 2019) and Zimbabwe (Chigara and Moyo, 2014). Considering the Sri Lankan context, the lack of importance for construction education in school curricula can be the major reason for the skills shortage amongst construction labourers (TVEC, 2017; Silva et al., 2018). Due to the skills shortage, unskilled labourers work as skilled labourers in many building construction projects in Sri Lanka. This makes complications amongst labourers to gain proper work experience and smooth career development, and it also results in poor quality of work outputs. Industry Sector Skills Councils (ISSC) of Sri Lanka highlighted the need for improving the labour training facilities in the Sri Lankan construction sector. ISSC also stated that the industry needs are not sufficiently covered in many training programmes of public sector institutes in Sri Lanka, particularly highlighting the poor cognitive and job-specific technical skills of the Sri Lankan labourers (TVEC, 2017).

3.2 Lack of knowledge/cognitive skills of labourers in construction works

The cognitive skills of labourers occupy a vital role in their processes of thinking, reading, learning, retaining information, paying attention, solving problems, remembering tasks and making decisions. The current study findings reveal that the lack of cognitive skills of labourers significantly affects the performance and productivity of labour operations in many building construction projects in Sri Lanka. The industry consultative experts stated that the cognitive skills of Sri Lankan labourers in various technical operations (specifically concreting, bar bending, plastering, tiling, welding, electrical works and equipment handling) are required to be significantly improved. Manoharan et al. (2021b) also revealed that the construction training institutions need to have a special focus on the cognitive skills of labourers in concreting, bar bending, plastering, plumbing, tiling, welding, electrical works, understanding drawings, material handling and equipment handling. Praveen et al. (2011) highlighted that the labourers’ poor knowledge of understanding drawings and material handling significantly affected the progress of construction activities in Sri Lanka.

3.3 Lack of thinking abilities amongst labourers

Critical thinking abilities are very important for labourers to make good decisions, understand the consequences of actions and solve problems in the work environment. These are also important life skills to make good linkages, perspective taking and communicating. The industry consultative experts stated that mental disabilities, lack of confidence, social conditioning, work pressure and personal problems are the major causes affecting the thinking abilities of labourers in construction. The experts also highlighted the need for regular brainstorming and meditation practices for the labourers at construction sites to improve their thinking abilities.

3.4 Poor discipline of labour

The discipline of labour is very important to carry out work operations in a structure/framework. Most of the Sri Lankan labourers are from a poor educational background, and they are unaware of the established guidelines that need to be followed for work performance and behaviour. The industry experts highlighted the unavailability of employee handbooks, standard operating procedures and employment agreements amongst most Sri Lankan construction firms. The poor discipline of labour has also been a significant factor affecting the productivity of construction operations in other developing countries, namely India (Dharani, 2015), Indonesia (Soekiman et al., 2011), Nigeria (Orando and Isabirye, 2018) and Vietnam (Dinh and Nguyen, 2019).

3.5 Lack of labour morale/commitment

Labour morale/commitment is the feeling of responsibility that a labourer has towards the goals and expectations of the firm. This significantly contributes to the improvement of labour productivity in construction activities, but the level of enthusiasm that most Sri Lankan labourers have towards their assigned tasks at their workplaces is inadequate. By comparing with Arabian, Chinese, Korean and Malaysian labour forces, which were the leading foreign labour forces in the skill-based ranked list, Manoharan et al. (2021b) highlighted the significant need for improving the commitment of Sri Lankan labourers in construction. The industry consultative experts stated that the secondary education and vocational training institutes in Sri Lanka must have attention to strengthening the soft skills and attitude domain components in the curricula of their education/training programmes. The construction firms also need to ensure the work environment to support the improvement in labour commitment to work.

3.6 Communication problems amongst labourers

This study reports that the poor communication skills of labourers are the major barrier to their teamwork and collaborative work involvement in many building construction projects in Sri Lanka. The industry consultative experts stated that this has resulted in misunderstandings amongst workers, errors in work, reworks and construction delays. The experts also highlighted the importance of linking the communication policies of construction firms with the quality controlling units since poor communications facilities result in poor work qualities in construction operations. The study also highlights the importance of labourers being well aware of safety communication practices to prevent unexpected injuries in work operations. The workplace injuries significantly contributed to the delays in many construction projects in Sri Lanka (Kesavan et al., 2015). Umar (2017) states that work-related injuries reduce the productivity of workforce operations and incur additional expenditures to the firms, such as clean-up costs, replacement costs, costs resulting from delays, supervision costs and costs related to rescheduling and transportation.

3.7 Poor abilities of reading, understanding, speaking and writing amongst labourers

The study findings show that the poor ability of reading, understanding, speaking and writing amongst labourers resulted in poor labour performance in the construction work environment in Sri Lanka. This has been a major barrier for the labourers to take on challenges and opportunities in their work environment. These abilities are very important for the labourers to learn new things related to work operations and broaden their cognitive, transferrable and self-management skills. Poor childhood education may be the specific reason for the abovementioned poor abilities of Sri Lankan labourers. Similar problems have also been reported by past studies considering Indian (Dharani, 2015; Murari and Joshi, 2019), South African (Windapo, 2016; Orando and Isabirye, 2018), Turkish (Kazaz et al., 2016) and Zimbabwean (Chigara and Moyo, 2014) labour forces working in construction projects.

3.8 Labour absenteeism

This study reports that labour absenteeism has been a significant problem for construction contractors in building construction projects in Sri Lanka. Notably, it also contributed to construction delays in Sri Lanka (Kesavan et al., 2015). The experts’ discussions highlighted the less job interest, less motivation, less commitment and work dissatisfaction of labourers as the major reasons for the labour absenteeism in many building construction projects in Sri Lanka. The experts also specified the following factors resulting in less job interest, less motivation and work dissatisfaction amongst Sri Lankan labourers.

  1. Salary delays and low salaries;

  2. No labour rewarding mechanisms;

  3. Lack of proper incentives;

  4. Improper promotion opportunities;

  5. Fewer welfare facilities for labourers;

  6. Lack of job security for labourers and

  7. Other ways of earning money.

3.9 Work overload

The study specifies that the intensity of the workloads of labourers has an impact on their performance in construction operations. A heavy workload affects the mood and behaviour of workers and causes poor mental focus, low motivation and difficulty in concentrating on work tasks (Semaksiani et al., 2019). This may strain relationships with co-workers and supervisors. Semaksiani et al. (2019) also stated that excessive workload causes a decrease in labour morale and labour motivation, resulting in work fatigue. Experts’ discussions highlight the unrealistic project schedules and sequences of construction tasks as the major reasons for the excessive workload of labourers in the Sri Lankan building construction projects. Proper project scheduling improves work efficiency and effective distribution of resources, leading to the reduction of cost and time. Experts highlighted the delays in obtaining permits/approvals from relevant authorities, conflicts in sub-contractors’ schedules and delays in subcontractors' work as the major causes for unrealistic project schedules. In addition, experts discussions revealed that poor time management skills of supervisors and less number of skilled labourers working are also the other factors causing high workloads amongst labourers.

3.10 Reliability and validity of the findings

Overall, the CV values of each factor ensure the reliability and precision of these findings. According to the range of CV values mentioned in the Labour Force Survey Guide 2020 of Canada (Statistics Canada, 2020), the CV values of all factors were within the allowable limit except for “labour strikes (L32)”. The reason for the exceeded CV value of L32 can be justified. The levels of effect of L32 may highly vary between the projects since only a few projects might be experienced labour strikes. Further, the L32 is ranked at the bottom of the list. The low mean value can also make an impact on the high CV value of L32. Hence, it does not mean that the CV value highlights the less precision of the result for the factor L32. In addition, the discussion outcomes of the industry consultative workshops and meetings also ensured the validity of the study findings.

4. Conclusions

Overall, the study has displayed the significant labour-related aspects that need to be concerned by the construction management team for improving the productivity of construction operations. The impact levels of the factors presented in this study show how much attention needs to be considered for each aspect related to labour for improving the productivity of construction operations. The study also presented why those factors are critical and how those influence various practices in a construction project. The significant findings of this study have been extensively compared with the past studies considering Sri Lankan and other foreign contexts. The validity and reliability of the study findings were also ensured using comprehensive approaches.

The study highlights the specific need for upgrading the vocational training programmes in the country to strengthen the cognitive, soft and job-specific skills of construction workers. The overall study findings are expected to contribute to the significant changes in management practices and organisational policies towards the long-term sustainability of the construction industry. The study outcomes may push the industry practices to reduce the gap between the organisational policies and labour operations leading to finding out better ways for the fulfilment of needs of construction labourers, as well as improving their lifestyles and life qualities. The study recommends future studies to focus on skills development practices for construction labourers and the development of competencies in labour supervision and labour management within the direct scope of productivity improvement. Accordingly, effective tools and mechanisms can be developed to evaluate performance and productivity levels of labour through work-based training practices. The study findings are limited to the Sri Lankan building construction project-level practices, also within the perspectives of engineers and construction managers, but some of these findings may also be tested in other developing countries in similar scenarios.

Figures

Detailed profile of survey respondents

Figure 1

Detailed profile of survey respondents

Labour-related factors affecting construction productivity - mapping with other past studies from different contexts of some developing countries

CodeFactorsPast studies from different countries
EgyptIndiaIndonesiaIranNigeriaPalestineSouth AfricaSri LankaTrinidad and Tobago TurkeyTurkmenistanVietnamZimbabwe
L1Lack of working experienceXX XXX XXXXXX
L2Poor education background X XX
L3Lack of knowledge in construction works X XX
L4Poor ability of reading, understanding, speaking and writing X XX X
L5Lack of thinking abilities X XXXX
L6Physical ability and fatigue XXX X
L7Health problems X
L8Use of alcohol and drugs XX
L9Lack of labour morale/commitment X X
L10Labour discipline XX X X
L11Ageing workforce X X X X
L12Psychological problems X X
L13Economic problems X X X
L14Personal problems X
L15Communication problems X X
L16Misunderstanding with other workers X X
L17Skill shortageXXXXX XX X
L18Mixture of three levels (skilled, semi-skilled and unskilled)XX XX X
L19Late arrival, early quit and frequent unscheduled breaks X
L20Unnecessary talksX
L21Work overload X
L22Work dissatisfaction X XX X
L23Inability to understand drawings X
L24Inability to adapt to changes in new environments X
L25Improper material handling X
L26Poor equipment/tool handling X
L27Changing nature of career expectation XX
L28Skill drain/emigration X
L29Less job interest due to family and society X X X
L30Other ways of earning money X XX
L31Labour absenteeismXXX
L32Labour strikes X

Impact levels of the labour-related factors on productivity of construction operations

Codes of factorsMeanRIISDCVRankingLevel of impact
L174.080.820.150.181High
L54.030.810.140.172High
L14.020.800.160.203High
L33.970.790.160.204High
L103.940.790.170.225High
L93.920.780.160.206High
L153.900.780.150.197High
L43.820.760.140.198High
L313.820.760.160.218High
L223.810.760.150.2010High
L63.710.740.120.1611High
L83.700.740.160.2212High
L263.700.740.140.1912High
L163.690.740.150.2014High
L193.670.730.120.1615High
L23.660.730.120.1616High
L253.630.730.120.1717High
L73.620.720.140.1918High
L123.590.720.130.1819High
L113.510.700.140.2020High
L203.510.700.120.1720High
L143.470.690.130.1822Moderate
L293.470.690.140.2022Moderate
L133.460.690.120.1724Moderate
L233.460.690.120.1724Moderate
L213.430.690.160.2326Moderate
L183.370.670.150.2227Moderate
L273.370.670.120.1827Moderate
L283.370.670.150.2227Moderate
L303.340.670.120.1830Moderate
L243.310.660.150.2231Moderate
L323.010.600.200.3332Moderate

References

Adi, H.P. and Ni’am, M.F. (2012), “Improving skill’s strategies of Indonesian construction labours to have global competitiveness”, International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 150-157, doi: 10.6088/ijcser.201203013014.

Agrawal, A. and Halder, S. (2020), “Identifying factors affecting construction labour productivity in India and measures to improve productivity”, Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 21, pp. 569-579, doi: 10.1007/s42107-019-00212-3.

Caulfield, J. (2019), “How to do thematic analysis?”, available at: https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/thematic-analysis/(accessed 16 October 2020).

Central Bank of Sri Lanka (2019), “Annual report”, Sri Lanka.

Chigara, B. and Moyo, T. (2014), “Factors affecting labor productivity on building projects in Zimbabwe”, International Journal of Architecture, Engineering and Construction, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 57-65, doi: 10.7492/IJAEC.2014.005.

Dharani, K. (2015), “Study on labours productivity management in construction industry”, International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 278-284.

Dinh, T.H. and Nguyen, V.T. (2019), “Analysis of affected factors on construction productivity in Vietnam”, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 854-864.

Durdyev, S., Ismail, S. and Bakar, N.A. (2013), “Construction productivity in Turkmenistan: survey of the constraining factors”, International Journal of E-Education, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 18-23.

Fernando, P.G.D., Fernando, N.G. and Gunarathna, M.A.C.L. (2016), “Skills developments of labourers to achieve the successful project delivery in the Sri Lankan construction industry”, Civil and Environmental Research, Vol. 8 No. 5, pp. 86-99.

Ghate, P.R. and Minde, P.R. (2016), “Labour productivity in construction”, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307138481_labour_productivity_in_construction/download (accessed 14 October 2020).

Ghoddousi, P., Pourafshar, O., Chileshe, N. and Hosseini, M.R. (2015), “Labour productivity in Iranian construction projects”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 64 No. 6, pp. 811-830, doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-10-2013-0169.

Halwatura, R.U. (2015), “Critical factors which govern labour productivity in building construction industry in Sri Lanka”, PM World Journal, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 1-13.

Hickson, B.G. and Ellis, L. (2013), “Factors affecting construction labour productivity in Trinidad and Tobago”, The Journal of the Association of Professional Engineers of Trinidad and Tobago, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 4-11.

Hughes, R. and Thorpe, D. (2014), “A review of enabling factors in construction industry productivity in an Australian environment”, Construction Innovation, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 210-228, doi: 10.1108/CI-03-2013-0016.

International Labour Organization (2015), “Construction: a hazardous work”, available at: http://www.ilo.org/safework/areasofwork/hazardous-work/WCMS_356576/lang–en/index.htm (accessed 21 April 2022).

Kaya, M., Keles, A.E. and Oral, E.L. (2014), “Construction crew productivity prediction by using data mining methods”, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 141, pp. 1249-1253, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.215.

Kazaz, A., Ulubeyli, S., Acikara, T. and Er, B. (2016), “Factors affecting labor productivity: perspectives of craft workers”, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 164, pp. 28-34, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.588.

Kesavan, M., Gobidan, N.N., Gobishanker, R. and Dissanayake, P.B.G. (2014), “Proper project planning in avoiding construction project delays”, Proceedings of the Special Sessions on Sustainable Design and Construction, 5th International Conference on Sustainable Built Environment, Kandy, pp. 77-84.

Kesavan, M., Gobidan, N.N. and Dissanayake, P.B.G. (2015), “Planning and mitigation methods to reduce the project delays in Sri Lankan construction industries”, Proceedings of the Session on Construction Materials and Systems, 6th International Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction Management, Kandy, pp. 102-107.

Mahamid, I. (2013), “Contractors perspective toward factors affecting labor productivity in building construction”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 446-460, doi: 10.1108/ECAM-08-2011-0074.

Manoharan, K., Dissanayake, P., Pathirana, C., Deegahawature, D. and Silva, R. (2020), “Assessment of critical factors influencing the performance of labour in Sri Lankan construction industry”, International Journal of Construction Management, pp. 1-12, doi: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1854042.

Manoharan, K., Dissanayake, P., Pathirana, C., Deegahawature, D. and Silva, R. (2021a), “A curriculum guide model to the next normal in developing construction supervisory training programmes”, Built Environment Project and Asset Management, pp. 1-31, doi: 10.1108/BEPAM-02-2021-0038.

Manoharan, K., Dissanayake, P., Pathirana, C., Deegahawature, D. and Silva, R. (2021b), “Comparison of skills between Sri Lankan and foreign construction labour”, in Sandanayake, Y.G., Gunatilake, S. and Waidyasekara, K.G.A.S. (Eds), Proceedings of the 9th World Construction Symposium, pp. 208-220, doi: 10.31705/WCS.2021.18.

Mistri, A., Patel, C.G. and Pitroda, J.R. (2019), “Analysis of causes, effects and impacts of skills shortage for sustainable construction through analytic hierarchy process”, International Journal of Technical Innovation in Modern Engineering and Science, Vol. 5 No. 5, pp. 168-176.

Murari, S.S. and Joshi, A.M. (2019), “Factors affecting labour productivity in precast construction industry”, Proceedings of Fourth National Conference on Road and Infrastructure, Bengaluru, India, pp. 163-169.

Nourhane, M.M., Ibrahim, M.M., Hesham, A.M. and Ibrahim, A.R. (2018), “Factors affecting construction labour productivity for construction of pre-stressed concrete bridges”, International Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 7 No. 6, pp. 193-206, doi: 10.5923/j.ijcem.20180706.01.

Oke, A., Aigbavboa, C. and Khangale, T. (2018), “Effect of skills shortage on sustainable construction”, in Charytonowicz, J. (Ed.), Advances in Human Factors, Sustainable Urban Planning and Infrastructure, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Springer, pp. 303-309.

Onyekachi, V.N. (2018), “Impact of low labour characteristics on construction sites productivity in EBONYI state”, International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 5 No. 10, pp. 7072-7087.

Orando, M. and Isabirye, A.K. (2018), “Construction workers’ skill development: a strategy for improving capacity and productivity in South Africa”, International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 66-80.

Praveen, R., Niththiyananthan, T., Kanarajan, S. and Dissanayake, P.B.G. (2011), “Shortage of skilled labour and professionals in the construction industry of Sri Lanka”, Transactions of the Institution of Engineers Sri Lanka, Vol. I, No. B, pp. 239-247.

Robles, G., Stifi, A., Jose, L.P. and Gentes, S. (2014), “Labor productivity in the construction industry - factors influencing the Spanish construction labor productivityWorld Academy of Science”, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Vol. 8 No. 10, pp. 1061-1070.

Saurav, D., Satya, N.M., Anil, S. and Subhav, S. (2017), “Relationship between skill development and productivity in construction sector: a literature review”, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, Vol. 8 No. 8, pp. 649-665.

Semaksiani, A., Handaru, A.W. and Rizan, M. (2019), “The effect of work loads and work stress on motivation of work productivity (empirical case study of ink-producing companies)”, Scholars Bulletin, pp. 560-571, doi: 10.36348/SB.2019.v05i10.003.

Shahab, S. and Audrius, B. (2018), “Application of fuzzy fault tree analysis to identify factors influencing construction labor productivity: a high-rise building case study”, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 41-52, doi: 10.3846/jcem.2019.7785.

Shanmuganathan, A., Disaratna, V. and Francis, M. (2014), “A study of procurement selection for bridge construction”, FARU Journal 2014, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 112-121.

Shashank, K., Hazra, S. and Pal, N.K. (2014), “Analysis of key factors affecting the variation of labour productivity in construction projects”, International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, Vol. 4 No. 5, pp. 152-160.

Shehata, M.E. and El-Gohary, K.M. (2011), “Towards improving construction labor productivity and projects’ performance”, Alexandria Engineering Journal, Vol. 50, pp. 321-330, doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2012.02.001.

Showkat, N. and Parveen, H. (2017), “Non-probability and probability sampling”, e-PG pathshala.

Silva, G.A.S.K., Warnakulasuriya, B.N.F. and Arachchige, B.J.H. (2018), “A review of the skill shortage challenge in construction industry in Sri Lanka”, International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 75-89.

Soekiman, A., Pribadi, K.S., Soemardi, B.W. and Wirahadikusumah, R.D. (2011), “Factors relating to labor productivity affecting the project schedule performance in Indonesia”, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 14, pp. 865-873, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.110.

Soham, M. and Rajiv, B. (2013), “Critical factors affecting labour productivity in construction projects: case study of South Gujarat Region of India”, International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 583-591.

Solly, M.S. and Gezani, R.M. (2017), “Construction and application of a statistical test for coefficient of variation on normal distributions”, American Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 14 No. 11, pp. 1024-1030, doi: 10.3844/ajassp.2017.1024.1030.

Statistics Canada (2020), “Guide to the labour force survey 2020”.

TVEC (2017), “Construction industry sector training plan 2018-2020”.

Umar, T. (2017), “Briefing: cost of accidents in the construction industry of Oman”, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Municipal Engineer, Vol. 170 No. 2, pp. 68-73, doi: 10.1680/jmuen.16.00032.

Umar, T. (2018), “Causes of delay in construction projects in Oman”, Middle East Journal of Management, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 121-136, doi: 10.1504/MEJM.2018.091132.

Umar, T. (2021), “Key factors influencing the implementation of three-dimensional printing in construction”, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Management, Procurement and Law, Vol. 174 No. 3, pp. 104-117, doi: 10.1680/jmapl.19.00029.

Umar, T. and Egbu, C. (2017), “Causes of construction accidents in Oman”, Middle East Journal of Management, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 21-33, doi: 10.1504/MEJM.2018.088725.

Umar, T., Egbu, C., Honnurvali, M.S., Saidani, M. and Al-Mutairi, M. (2018a), “An assessment of health profile and body pain among construction workers”, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Municipal Engineer. doi: 10.1680/jmuen.18.00019.

Umar, T., Egbu, C., Wamuziri, S. and Honnurvali, M.S. (2018b), “Briefing: occupational safety and health regulations in Oman”, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Management, Procurement and Law, Vol. 171 No. 3, pp. 93-99, doi: 10.1680/jmapl.18.00007.

Widanagamachchi, U.C. (2013), “The labour motivation of construction industry in Sri Lanka”, A Thesis of the Master of Science in Construction Project Management, University of Moratuwa.

Windapo, A.O. (2016), “Skilled labour supply in the South African construction industry: the nexus between certification, quality of work output and shortages”, SA Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.4102/sajhrm.v14i1.750.

Zannah, A.A., Latiffi, A.A., Raji, A.U., Waziri, A.A. and Mohammed, U. (2017), “Causes of low-skilled workers’ performance in construction projects”, Path of Science, Vol. 3 No. 6, pp. 4.1-4.15, doi: 10.22178/pos.23-7.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the construction professionals who actively participated in the questionnaire survey and discussion sessions in this study. In addition, the Tertiary and Vocational Education Commission of Sri Lanka, Construction Industry Development Authority, University of Peradeniya and Wayamba University of Sri Lanka are also acknowledged for providing valuable support to this study.

Disclosure statement: No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Data availability statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Corresponding author

Kesavan Manoharan is the corresponding author and can be contacted at: kesavan@wyb.ac.lk

About the authors

Kesavan Manoharan is serving as Lecturer in the Department of Construction Technology, Faculty of Technology, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka (Sri Lanka) at present. He graduated from the University of Peradeniya (Sri Lanka) with a BSc Eng (Hons) degree specialised in Civil Engineering in 2014. Manoharan is currently reading his PhD in the area of Civil Engineering and Construction Management at the Faculty of Engineering, University of Peradeniya (Sri Lanka). His current research focus is to develop relevant practices for improving the productivity and performance of labour operations in construction.

Pujitha Dissanayake is serving as Senior Lecturer in the Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Peradeniya (Sri Lanka) at present. He graduated from the University of Peradeniya (Sri Lanka) with a BSc Eng (Hons) degree specialised in Civil Engineering in 1991 and obtained his PhD from the University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong) in 1999. Dr Dissanayake also worked as a Project Manager / Planning Engineer at Maunsell AECOM (Hong Kong) from 1998 to 2007. His current research interests are related to the field of civil engineering and construction management track.

Chintha Pathirana is serving as Senior Lecturer in the Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Peradeniya (Sri Lanka) at present. She obtained her BSc Eng, MSc Eng and PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of Peradeniya (Sri Lanka). Dr Pathirana also has Charted Engineering qualifications of the Institution of Engineers, Sri Lanka. Her current research interests are related to civil engineering, construction materials and construction management.

Dharsana Deegahawature is serving as Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial Management, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka (Sri Lanka) at present. He obtained his BSc (Business Administration) from the University of Sri Jayewardenepura (Sri Lanka) in 1999, MBA (Technology Management) from the Asian Institute of Technology (Thailand) in 2006 and PhD in Management from the Huazhong University of Science and Technology (China) in 2014. Professor Deegahawature is also presently serving as the Director of the Staff Development Centre, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka. His current research interests are related to industrial management and technology management.

Renuka Silva is presently serving as the Professor (Chair) in the Department of Applied Nutrition, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka (Sri Lanka). He obtained his BSc (Hons) in Agriculture from the University of Peradeniya (Sri Lanka) and PhD in the discipline of Human Nutrition from the University of Reading (United Kingdom). Professor Silva held several academic and administrative positions at the Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, and he is presently serving as the Director of the Centre for Quality Assurance. Professor Silva’s research interests span wider areas in nutrition and also in quality assurance-related practices in education/training.

Related articles