Manuscripts submitted for publication in the information profession in africa: a comparative analysis of characteristics of rejected and accepted papers

Abstract

A comparative analysis of the characteristics of rejected manuscripts submitted for publication to the African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science and manuscripts accepted for publication over a five year period was carried out. The study reveals that 145 manuscripts were rejected as opposed to eighty papers accepted for publication. The findings reveal that there were no remarkable differences with regards to status and affiliations between the authors of rejected and accepted papers. While information technology, archives, user studies, academic libraries and bibliometrics constituted the topics of papers mostly rejected, papers accepted were mainly in the areas of archives, information service, information technology and rural information. Most of the papers were rejected because they contributed nothing new to knowledge (65.5 per cent), used unreliable data (13.1 per cent) and lacked focus (13.1 per cent). Datedness of references was not used in rejecting papers because the editorial board policy is to update references of papers accepted for publication where necessary. The paper recommends the need for training institutions in Africa to strengthen the research and writing skills component of their curricula, as well as the regular scheduling of research and writing skills workshops by information organisations in the region.

Citation

Aina, L.O. and Mabawonku, I.M. (1998), "Manuscripts submitted for publication in the information profession in africa: a comparative analysis of characteristics of rejected and accepted papers", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 54 No. 2, pp. 250-255. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007169