Influence and reputation in the social sciences – how much do researchers agree?

Heine Andersen (Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen, Linnésgade 22, DK 1361 Copenhagen K, Denmark)

Journal of Documentation

ISSN: 0022-0418

Publication date: 1 December 2000

Abstract

The existence of hierarchies based on reputation in modern science is indisputable. A set of common scientific journals is often assumed to be instrumental in the formation of these hierarchies. However, the character of the hierarchies, how monolithic/pluralistic they are and the functions of this differentiation have been discussed and caused controversy. The article brings together results from a survey of 788 Danish researchers, mainly from the social sciences, concerning their assessments of the most influential researchers and most important journals. The rankings indicate a pluralistic picture and only a moderate degree of consensus among researchers. Comparisons with (the few) other surveys and with citation data do not suggest this to be a peculiarity of Danish social scientists, however.

Keywords

Citation

Andersen, H. (2000), "Influence and reputation in the social sciences – how much do researchers agree?", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 56 No. 6, pp. 674-692. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007132

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2000, MCB UP Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.