Pitfalls in choosing non‐financial measures

The Antidote

ISSN: 1363-8483

Publication date: 1 April 1996

Abstract

Investigates how organizations pick which non‐financial measures to use to enable managers to know what requires attention, and what can be ignored for now. Lists out in a table format these essential differences between financial and non‐financial measures. Stresses there are two potential pitfalls: first is the tendency for non‐financial measures to run down with use; and, second, stresses the importance of looking at internally‐generated criteria in the light of external values. Confirms that reiteration of essential differences is a strong reminder of the ease in which non‐financial measures can multiply.

Keywords

Citation

Kippenberger, T. (1996), "Pitfalls in choosing non‐financial measures", The Antidote, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 28-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006395

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1996, MCB UP Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.