The balanced scorecard

The Antidote

ISSN: 1363-8483

Publication date: 1 April 1996

Abstract

Gives a comparative analysis about the differences between the balanced scorecard and other, more traditional, financial accounting measures, such as ROI and EPS that may give misleading signals. Advocates that the balanced scorecard's advantages — such as giving managers the ability to view performance simultaneously in several areas. Itemizes the four main perspectives as: the customer; the internal; innovation and learning; and financial. Cautions that the four goals and measures must be reflective of the company's specific view of the world and what its own critical success factors must be, though even with these excellent balanced scorecard measures a winning strategy is not guaranteed.

Keywords

Citation

Kippenberger, T. (1996), "The balanced scorecard", The Antidote, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 8-9. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006388

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1996, MCB UP Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.