Supporting progression to HE: the role of colleges and vocational courses

Clare Elizabeth Gartland (School of Psychology and Education, University of Suffolk, Ipswich, UK)
Christine Smith (Department of Quality, University of Suffolk, Ipswich, UK)

Education + Training

ISSN: 0040-0912

Publication date: 9 July 2018

Abstract

Purpose

Vocational courses in England support the progression to higher education (HE) of large numbers of young people from disadvantaged backgrounds, yet there is little research exploring the college experiences of these young people prior to entering university. The purpose of this paper is to consider the experiences of young people on Level 3 Business and Technology Education Council (BTEC) vocational courses in their progression to HE from differently positioned post-16 colleges in England.

Design/methodology/approach

A qualitative study was undertaken into the experiences of students on BTEC courses in four subject clusters (science, technology, engineering and maths, arts and humanities, social sciences and health) at both a Further Education College and a Sixth Form College in an area of multiple deprivation and low HE participation. Young people’s experiences of BTEC courses and the support and guidance they receive are explored through the conceptual lens of “possible selves” and using Bourdieu’s ideas of capital, habitus and field.

Findings

Pedagogies and practices on BTEC courses are found to support the development of relevant social and cultural capital and help young people formulate well-articulated “possible selves” as university students, even amongst students who previously had not considered university as an option. The findings illustrate how differently positioned colleges support students’ progression and identify challenges presented by an increasingly stratified and marketised system.

Originality/value

The study highlights the transformative potential of BTEC courses and their role in supporting progression to HE amongst young people from economically disadvantaged backgrounds. The current emphasis on standardisation and rigour as mechanisms to better equip students for HE neglects the unique contribution BTEC pedagogies and practices make to encouraging HE participation. A Bourdieusian and “possible selves” theoretical framework has provided new insights into these valuable learning processes.

Keywords

Citation

Gartland, C. and Smith, C. (2018), "Supporting progression to HE: the role of colleges and vocational courses", Education + Training, Vol. 60 No. 6, pp. 637-650. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-02-2018-0053

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited


Introduction

Socio-economic status and social class have been identified in the UK and other countries as impacting on higher education (HE) access, integration, retention and success (Reay et al., 2010; Gale and Parker, 2015; Thomas and Quinn, 2007). In the UK, vocational Business and Technology Education Council (BTEC) level 3 qualifications (including combined BTEC and A levels) supported the progression of 26 per cent of students to HE in 2016 (Gicheva and Petrie, 2017). Most BTEC courses are categorised as Applied General Qualifications, described by the Department of Education as “for post-16 students wanting to continue their education through applied learning” (Kelly, 2017, p. 5). BTEC qualifications have particularly supported the progression of students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds (Smith et al., 2015; Shields and Masardo, 2015; Kelly, 2017; Gicheva and Petrie, 2017). Kelly (2017) suggests that “nearly all increases in students from lower participation neighbourhoods since 2008 can be accounted for by the increase in number holding BTECs” (p. 13).

Concerns have been raised about the performance of BTEC students on degree programmes compared to their A level counterparts. A gap in the achievement of BTEC students on degree courses has been identified, with fewer BTEC students achieving first and upper second class degrees. This exists even when demographics and entry tariff are accounted for (Shields and Masardo, 2015). There is a gap in completion rates: of students entering university in 2014/2015 12 per cent entering with BTEC qualifications dropped out, compared to 6.2 per cent of all students. Kelly (2017) also points to a gap in completion rates linked to the type of institution, with the highest completion rates (72.4 per cent) at new universities and the lowest rates (58.5 per cent) at Russell Group institutions. Such issues have led to criticisms of BTEC courses as a route to HE and reactively, calls by the Chief Executive of UCAS to identify “ways to increase participation in A levels” (Kelly, 2017, p. 21). However, further research into the impact of other factors known to affect students’ success in HE, particularly in terms of students’ socio-economic backgrounds, is needed for comparisons between A levels and BTECs to be more meaningful (Gicheva and Petrie, 2018). The UK Government has responded to concerns by instigating a number of changes aimed to increase the academic rigour of BTEC qualifications, including the introduction of pass or fail exams. Kelly (2017) questions the benefits of this academisation and categorisation of BTECS as explicitly academic routes, problematising this move away from their original role as qualifications facilitating progression to the workplace as well as HE.

Significant changes are underway in the English post-16 sector. Current government policy is focussed on the marketization of education and providing increased choice. Under the Coalition and Conservative administrations (2010–2016), there have been significant shifts in post-16 provision. Academisation and the increased numbers of school sixth forms have heightened competition for appropriately qualified young people. As Ball (2010) points out, there are “economies of student worth” (p. 163) in this system, and those with fewer academic qualifications, predominantly from poorer backgrounds, have less value than higher performing peers. Within this stratified system, the college sector is increasingly positioned as the location for lower achieving, generally poorer, working class students, destined for vocational rather than academic routes. However, over recent years this sector has provided a high number of non-traditional students with a route into HE. Between 2008 and 2012 a total of 795,470 students progressed to university from Further Education and Sixth Form Colleges. Vocational courses played a significant role in supporting this: between 2011 and 2012 41 per cent of these students progressed via BTEC courses (Smith et al., 2015). While the achievement gap between BTEC and A level students remains a concern, it is important to acknowledge success rates amongst BTEC students at degree level are still significant (Smith and Jamieson, 2015; Kelly, 2017; Gicheva and Petrie, 2018).

Given the shifting landscape of these qualifications and their providers, it is vital to understand the success of BTECs in supporting progression to HE amongst students from lower socio-economic groups, and to explore how courses and institutions contribute to young people’s progression and self-identification as university students. This paper focusses on the experiences of BTEC students located in FE and Sixth Form colleges in a low participation neighbourhood and economically deprived area in England. This has relevance for policy and practice in post-16 education and universities where students from lower socio-economic groups and BTEC courses are often problematised.

Past, present and future: the relevance of Bourdieu and possible selves

Bourdieusian educational research has highlighted the ways educational institutions perpetuate existing social hierarchies (Duckworth, 2013; Reay et al., 2005, 2010). Sixth Form and FE colleges are both located within the field of post-16 education but they are positioned differently, preparing students in different ways to encounter the field of HE. Reay et al. (2005) identify an institutional effect or “institutional habitus […] educational status, organisational practices and expressive order” of post-16 institutions in influencing developing HE identities amongst young people (p. 39). This expressive order includes “expectations, conduct, character and manners”, particularly important are seen to be students’ “attitudes towards learning and their degree of confidence and entitlement in relation to academic knowledge” (Reay et al., 2010, p. 109). Once in HE, Reay et al. (2010) contend the type of university working class students attend influences both “how they see themselves” and how “they are seen by others in terms of both their learner and class identities” and suggest this is important in how young people’s learner identities “evolve and develop” (Reay et al., 2010, p. 111). The collective habitus of staff and the history and reputation of institutions contributes to the cultural capital young people generate during their time at colleges and universities, and this interacts with and informs their individual habitus. Following Reay et al. (2009), habitus is understood here as “a complex interplay between past and present” and as being “permeable and responsive to what is going on” (p. 1104).

In response to ongoing concern about equality in progression into science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) subjects and careers, Archer et al. (2015) have extended Bourdieusian concepts of capital to include science capital. Their research identifies how low and high levels of science capital impact on young people’s subject identities and post-16 plans, highlighting the importance of science-related: cultural capital, behaviours and practices and social capital. This Bourdieusian lens critically informs our understanding of how young people’s learner and subject identities are shaped by curricular, extra-curricular activity and social interactions.

Bourdieu provides useful tools for considering the past and present, and how structural constraints affect young people’s future orientations. However, Gale and Parker (2015, p. 81) point to the limitations of Bourdieusian analysis in conceptualising students’ aspirations as “produced by and reproductive of cultural histories”. They draw on Appadurai (2004) who argues against allowing “pastness to dominate” and instead focusses on theorising aspiration as a future orientated “navigational capacity” (Gale and Parker, 2015). James (2015) notes individuals are “not the primary unit of analysis for Bourdieu”, as they are conceptualised as part of social processes; this means that Bourdieu does not easily provide a “recipe for action” (James, 2015, pp. 107–108). Ferrare and Apple (2016) suggest Bourdieu’s emphasis on “the macro view of cultural fields” has not allowed for more “nuanced understanding of how actors construct, experience and struggle over meanings in local contexts” (p. 45). Understanding wider social processes is vital, but to understand how to better support students’ progression to HE and how colleges in the post-16 field support this, we also need an understanding of the interplay between these social processes and students’ motivation and ability to take action.

The “possible selves” literature from social psychology, whilst acknowledging the centrality of the past and the sociocultural location of individuals and the fluidity of identity, clearly conceptualises young people as agentic (Erikson, 2007; Rossiter, 2009). Young people are seen through the lens of possible selves to be envisioning desired and undesired possible future selves and to be actively creating their own pathways towards their future (Markus and Nurius, 1986; Rossiter, 2009; Ibarra, 2007; Stevenson and Clegg, 2011). Ibarra (2007), in her exploration of the processes of career identity transition, points to the importance of the elaboration of career possible selves, particularly during the liminal period when people are struggling with competing identities.

Education policy in England presents young people as responsible for navigating their own career trajectory, with failure and success widely attributed to individual talents and failings (Evans, 2007). “Possible selves” provides a useful theoretical lens to explore young people’s future orientations and to consider how HE identities are formed. As Oyserman et al. (2004) suggest “if we wish to improve outcomes for low-income and minority inner city youths, we must help them link wishes, expectations, and concerns for their academic future with concrete strategies to take action” (p. 145). This focus has implications for policy as well as practices within FE and HE institutions.

Methodology

A small-scale qualitative study was undertaken as part of an HE transitions project for the Quality Assurance Agency. The focus was to identify practical strategies to support transition to HE for young people on BTEC courses. The Sixth Form and FE colleges where interviews and focus groups were undertaken, are located in an area of low HE participation and in the poorest fifth of areas nationally (Index of Multiple Deprivation, 2010) indicating students at these colleges are from lower socio-economic groups. In total, 12 paired interviews were held with students who were planning to progress to HE, during the final term of their BTEC courses. The students were studying on courses in four broad subject clusters (STEM, arts and humanities, social sciences and health). Participants were, with one exception, first in their family to go to university and predominantly white British.

The ambition was to find out about these learners’ experiences of their current courses and institutions, their decision making about HE courses and institutions, their feelings about progression to university and their developing identities as HE students. The overarching research question was:

RQ1.

What learning attitudes and conceptions of HE study are found among students in FE and 6th form colleges?

Interviews were loosely structured and drew on narrative approaches (Hollway and Jefferson, 2013) to encourage participants to identify areas of focus important to them during their discussions of experiences. This paper focusses on the accounts of students interviewed who were intending to progress to universities rather than continue into HE in the FE college. The students interviewed had volunteered to participate following a request from their college tutors and it is acknowledged this will inevitably will impact on who was represented and that the voices of students not engaged in learning and who are “least well-served” (Silva, 2001, p. 98) are unlikely to be represented in this study.

While existing literature was used in the development of interview questions, the approach to data collection and analysis was inductive, drawing on constructivist grounded theory (Charmaz, 2014). Data analysis involved systematically identifying categories of description following line by line coding. Categories were subsequently considered in relation to the wider literature. Educational research literature using Bourdieu’s concepts of “habitus”, “field” and “capital” (Duckworth, 2013; Ferrare and Apple, 2015; Reay et al., 2005; Crozier and Reay, 2010; Reay, 2015) and the possible selves literature (Markus and Nurius, 1986; Ibarra, 2007; Rossiter, 2009; Stevenson and Clegg, 2011) was particularly relevant. Drawing on this conceptual framework, students’ accounts of their courses of study, the practices of their institutions and their developing identities as HE students were considered. These perspectives have enabled an exploration of the extent to which young people feel able to take action, whilst understanding their structural location and how this positions them.

Following Charmaz (2014), the authors “start with the assumption that social reality is multiple, processual, and constructed” (p. 13) and acknowledge the importance of their own positioning. Their own experience of learning and teaching in HE and in the 16–19 sector has inevitably shaped the lens through which data have been considered.

An institutional effect: differently positioned colleges in the post-16 “field”

The group of young people interviewed were unanimous in the view that their FE and Sixth Form colleges had supported their progression to university. Students repeatedly commented on how the more “adult” environment of college helped them prepare for HE:

[…] we’ve got the feeling of being treated as an adult here but it’s not quite at university level so it is preparing us a little bit and then we’ll get treated completely like an adult and we’ll be treated to be independent and it’s just a step along the way to helping us

(Sixth Form College, BTEC Forensic Science).

While students at both colleges were positive about their experiences, accounts indicated the two institutions were differently positioned in the “field” of post-16 education. The FE College was viewed by both FE and Sixth Form students as “being a bit shabby” (FE College. BTEC Health and Social Care), a denigrated space (Hodgson and Spours, 2014). This was largely due to the perception that it caters for the less academic whereas the Sixth Form College caters for the “smart” students who “want to learn” (Sixth Form College, BTEC Children’s Play, Learning and Development). Students at the FE college were acutely aware of the positioning of their college and implications for how they were viewed. They understood this linked to the vocational courses offered at the institution, whereas “A levels, not diplomas, were the qualifications of choice” (Hodgson and Spours, 2014, p. 478). The FE students described derogatory ways in which BTEC students at the FE College were talked about on social media by local A level students:

They do call us Btards.

Clare: Who calls you Btards?

The A level students.

There’s a lot on social media.

People perceive BTEC students to be so dumb.

(FE: BTEC Health and Social Care).

The “perceived lower status” (Hodgson and Spours, 2014, p. 478) of BTEC courses is linked to the fact that BTECs, while recognised by some HEIs and courses, are not universally recognised by universities (Hodgson and Spours, 2014; Shields and Masardo, 2015; Kelly, 2017; Gicheva and Petrie, 2017).

Students’ accounts suggest the hierarchical positioning of colleges and their access to these institutions affect their self-perception, learner identity and shape their individual habitus. The process of applying to and progressing from differently positioned colleges within a stratified system can reinforce and bolster the learner identities of young people, or undermine and even damage them. Two students at the FE college talked emotionally about their rejection from A level courses, due to their GCSE grades, and argued passionately that BTEC and A levels were in fact equivalent. In her exploration of a psychosocial understanding of habitus, Reay (2015) describes that, “the learning that comes through ‘inhabiting pathologised spaces’ can lead to a ‘predilection for shame, fear, anxiety and even righteous indignation’. She goes on to suggest that these ‘affective and psychological transactions become sedimented in certain habitus’” (p. 12). Attaining denigrated (BTEC) qualifications within a pathologised learning space is unlikely to support a sense of “confidence and entitlement” amongst these young people. In contrast, students’ attendance at the Sixth Form College where “smart” students go is likely to contribute to these young people’s “attitudes towards learning and their degree of confidence and entitlement” (Reay et al, 2010, p. 109). The positioning of students within the stratified field of post-16 educational provision is therefore likely to impact on students’ identities, regardless of the quality of their learning experiences.

There were differences identified between the practices at the two institutions. The FE college has strong links with local industry and offers vocational work-related courses with only a minority of students progressing to university and level 4 courses. FE students on work-based vocational routes, particularly the engineering students, were often on clear progression routes onto HE courses within the FE college. However, those moving onto courses at universities described receiving little institutional support:

Help with UCAS generally in the college – that was quite bad. I basically did the whole thing by myself

(FE: BTEC Health and Social Care).

In contrast, the Sixth Form College focusses specifically on 16–19 education and supporting progression to HE is a central aim: offering A levels, BTECs as well as mixed A level and BTEC courses. The institution presents HE as an option academically and through the careers information, advice and guidance provided. Half of the students interviewed at the Sixth Form College, all of whom had attained conditional and unconditional HE places, had not intended to go to university at the start of their level 3 courses (6 out of a total of 12 students). Their accounts indicated that being at the Sixth Form College had instigated their decision to progress. Typically, one student explained how she had not “even thought about” university but the fact that university is “talked about” at Sixth Form College and her enjoyment of being at the college had led to her decision to continue studying:

I didn’t really want to go […] I hadn’t even thought about it – I’ll just go to college then any outcome. It’s been great here. Like it’s talked about – not like a show or anything and it’s mentioned and you think oh – then I started looking at universities and open days last year and I was like, oh I like the look of that […]

(Sixth Form College, BTEC Forensic Science).

While research has highlighted students from lower socio-economic groups (Reay et al., 2005), predominantly remain local whilst studying for their degrees, 9 out of twelve BTEC students interviewed at the Sixth Form College had applied to universities in different areas of the UK.

These findings indicate that differently positioned institutions within the field of 16–19 education affect students’ learner identities and perception of their “possible selves” as HE students. This “institutional effect” shapes students’ habitus and defines their “parameters of possibilities” (Reay et al., 2010).

Possible selves as university students: BTEC courses and institutions

The assumption in education policy that young people are future orientated, envisioning their future employed selves in their active engagement with post-16 and HE providers (Stevenson and Clegg, 2011) is problematic. Young people’s aspirations are circumscribed by social conditions and the range and detail of possible selves available to them is constrained by their immediate social world. Markus and Nurius (1986) point to how the range of possible selves available to young people “derives from the categories made salient by the individual’s particular sociocultural and historical context […] and by the individual’s immediate social experiences” (p. 954).

For a number of the students contributing to this study, possible selves as university students had not previously been an envisioned future. Contributing to this was student’s familial habitus as well as low levels of attainment at GCSE, with schools in the area consistently achieving well below schools nationally. A number of participants had left secondary schooling without the GCSE grades necessary for progression to A level courses, widely seen (Kelly, 2017; Gicheva and Petrie, 2017) as the route to HE. Students’ accounts indicated some had left school with “negative prior experiences” (Duckworth and Smith, 2017) and damaged learner identities. Studying on BTEC courses at the FE and Sixth Form Colleges provided these young people with new and different learning experiences, motivating them to re-engage. BTECs provided some with a second chance and an opportunity to progress to university when they had not previously considered this a possibility. Crucially, the experience of studying on BTEC courses supported the development of new identities as successful learners. Research widely indicates the vital role positive learner identities play in supporting progression to HE (Brooks, 2003; Reay et al., 2009, 2010). For some, immersing themselves in positive learning experiences in the present through their BTEC courses was a vital stage in overcoming negative experiences from school and in being able to subsequently envision their futures (Stevenson and Clegg, 2011):

And the work itself – I just enjoy that. I used to hate education, like literally [at school] it was the white board […] the worst thing […] [now] I just really enjoy it

(Sixth Form: BTEC Music Technology).

The experience of being on BTEC courses was transformative for some. Jack described how one teacher from his secondary school who moved to the college, noted this transformation in his attitude to work:

I used to be really lazy but you ask my teachers – when [a teacher who had taught him at secondary school] came here, ‘cause he wasn’t here when I started […] and him and [Head of Department] was speaking and he said “oh what’s happened to Jack? I used to teach him and he used to be one of the laziest students in the class”. But it’s just like so much work you’ve got to change your attitude towards it. It’s good for you – it’s not bad for you

(Sixth Form: BTEC IT).

Ibarra (2007) presents a model for career identity transition where career change involves a change in identity which involves a change in individuals’ set of possible selves (Ibarra, 2007; Rossiter, 2009). Ibarra suggests three avenues in the elaboration of new career possible selves: direct action (activities), social interaction (relationships) and sense making (events). For many of the students in this study being an HE student had not been considered prior to starting BTEC courses. Ibarra’s model is relevant in understanding these students’ transformation. Ibarra’s three avenues are used to frame the discussion of the following sections.

Activities—experiential learning on BTEC courses

The practical focus of learning activities undertaken during BTEC courses encourages students to reflect on the practical application of subject knowledge in real world settings. This raises students’ awareness of their possible future positioning within these settings. Rossiter (2009) suggests the “operative dynamic” in this “is experiential learning […] learning about new roles and their potential fit for one’s identity by engaging in actions associated with those roles” (p. 64). Experiential learning is based on “concrete experience, reflective observation of experience, abstract conceptualisation and active experimentation” (Colley et al., 2003, p. 56). Students’ accounts of learning experiences on BTEC courses indicated this experiential learning was motivational, providing them with opportunities to understand real world application of knowledge and to find out about associated roles and career possible selves:

I’d never experienced some of those things before like being able to play a gig or even set up a gig or get a band in and record them and just meet them and see how they play […] just try new things, play new instruments ‘cause they’ve got pianos, bass guitars […] and just hear other people play as well ‘cause you get like people who play flute come in, saxophones. You experience them playing as well

(Sixth Form, BTEC Music Technology).

It’s also how they do some of the assignments, like in the crime scene one we had to do in the first year, instead of just giving us pictures of one they’ve done or scenarios or something, they actually make a crime scene for you and they give you the suit and they give you bits of information and they send you in to do it […] it’s you who is doing the solving

(Sixth Form, BTEC forensic science).

The Health and Social Care students at the FE college talked enthusiastically about placements experienced on their courses which provided opportunities for experiential learning, where they gained a genuine insight into relevant careers: “placements are so helpful cause […] you see it all”.

These learning activities were supporting the development of embodied cultural capital of particular value within subject areas and occupational fields. One student described her pleasure that during interviews for HE midwifery and nursing courses, she knew the terminology used by lecturers. This linguistic capital provided her with a sense of confidence and even entitlement:

They were saying all about safeguarding, multidisciplinary teams, you know, all that kind of thing and I was like thinking yeah, I know what she’s talking about

(FE: BTEC Health and Social Care).

The structure of courses with ongoing assessments rather than exams, also provided the opportunity for students with negative experiences of examined courses, to see themselves as successful learners. The focus on coursework in BTEC qualifications was seen as encouraging students to work more consistently, whilst end of course exams were viewed as demotivating: “I would have dropped out, in my opinion, if I’d done GCSEs and A level […] at A level you just have to keep revising until a certain date when you do exams” (Sixth Form, BTEC Music Technology). As Jack (Sixth Form, BTEC IT) explained about BTEC coursework “it’s just like so much work, you’ve got to change your attitude towards it”.

Significantly, for students with developing interests in particular vocational areas, the BTECs provided clear, articulated progression routes. As Oyserman et al. (2004) point out, if under-developed, possible selves do not evoke “behavioural strategies”. Possible selves can “regulate behaviour” if the self-concept contains “not only goals or desired end states, but also strategies about how to behave in order to reach the desired end state” (p. 131). For Jack, the structured nature of the IT BTEC course and his success on it was motivational, supporting the development of his HE identity and his attainment of BTEC qualifications. The possible selves literature indicates the development of new viable and motivational possible selves are facilitated by “visualizing and practising” (Rossiter, 2009, p. 70) the new self. BTEC courses with their vocational foci and clear pathways to related degree courses and careers appeared to effectively facilitate HE identities and possible career selves amongst students interviewed. Students at both colleges were able to “reclaim […] educational identities” (Duckworth and Smith, 2017) damaged by past school experiences and re-envision themselves as successful learners in both college and university settings.

Relationships—peers, tutors and other sources of information

The opportunity courses presented to work with others sharing similar interests and enthusiasms were described as part of the appeal of BTEC courses (Gartland and Smith, 2015). Some students worked closely together and even appeared to be developing shared subject and student identities, planning to go to the same university and study on the same course as peers. Two of the students studying information and communications technology (ICT) described intending to progress to the same course and institution. One student even relied on his friend for information; there was a sense of a joint decision-making process:

I found out that two of my best friends are going there and that the area of [place] looks really nice […] He [friend on the same course] went up there and I said take loads of photos for me […] and hopefully I’m going up there next month

(Sixth Form: BTEC ICT).

Brooks (2003) suggests friendship groups are not comfortable places for discussions about HE decision making, as they highlight academic differences between friends applying for different types of HE institutions. By contrast, in some instances in this study the friendship groups of students and wider peer group operated powerfully on students’ HE choices. A key reason for this may be that the majority of students were similarly positioned and on a trajectory into the post-92 university sector, the predominant destination for students with BTEC qualifications (Kelly, 2017; Gicheva and Petrie, 2018).

According to Rossiter (2009), teachers often support or initiate the development of possible career selves. Students’ relationships with their BTEC course tutors were in several instances highly significant in providing vital information about HE; tutors were “guiding figures” (Ibarra, 2007, p. 27). Students on BTEC courses spend considerably longer with individual subject tutors than A Level students. In several subject areas, BTEC courses were found to have facilitated a close relationship with tutors who often seemed instrumental in raising students’ levels of awareness of university as an accessible option. Many described their tutors as “young” and therefore able to talk authentically about their own university experiences; tutors appeared to be “sounding boards” for these young peoples’ sense-making efforts (Ibarra, 2007, p. 27). The focus on experiential learning on some BTEC courses may have also contributed to the positioning of tutors as role models (Gartland, 2014, 2015).

Students listened to tutors who were clearly trusted “hot sources” of information about university (Slack et al., 2014; Smith, 2011); in several instances tutors’ accounts of their own experiences had been influential in students’ decision to go to university. A few even planned to study at the same institution and on the same course as their BTEC tutor:

I never had interest in uni in the first year. For some reason in the second year it just came to me that I wanted to do it. It mainly was ‘cause the teacher was telling me all about it saying there is always a choice either to go to a job or apprenticeship or uni. He’s just telling me about each one and just saying about how – ‘cause he went to uni – and just saying how uni really is and just the whole process of it and that’s what got me interested

(Sixth Form, BTEC IT).

Students’ accounts illustrate BTEC tutors played an important role in supporting, engaging and motivating them. However, different institutional practices were evident. Whilst individual BTEC tutors provided students at the FE college with considerable support, there was a more extensive network of support drawn from a range of sources at the Sixth Form College, providing access to more relevant social capital. This is significant as whilst a close relationship with BTEC tutors can positively support confidence and development and articulation of possible selves, the development of relevant social capital is limited if other social sources of support and information are not available.

During a focus group at the Sixth Form College, teachers observed that when students start at the college they often do not view HE as a possibility and identified it as part of the college’s mission to support students in understanding HE is an available option:

The college’s strategy is to add value – there are lots of cross college strategies – loads of initiatives.

Students at the college massively lack confidence [about going to university] and don’t think they can go or have been told they can’t go and it’s part of our job to get them to realise that it is an option

(Sixth Form: Teacher focus group).

Staff explained how tutorials are held with students where they look at maps and work out the distances and travel options for different HEIs. One member of staff explained this was to encourage students to consider a wider range of universities in different localities. Staff discussed “dispelling myths” about HE, including challenging perceptions about teaching always comprising of formal lectures. Teachers also described maps displayed in each faculty for BTEC students, illustrating previous students’ pathways to university.

The students at the Sixth Form College also had additional tutorials with “mentors”, themselves recent graduates, who were seen by students to provide significant help and support with the UCAS application process:

We have our mentors […] they’re quite young […] they’ve literally just graduated so with UCAS and stuff. They’re literally on it. I think she sat there for three hours with me doing my last amendment and my personal statement

(Sixth Form: BTEC Children’s Play, Learning and Development).

UCAS applications and the writing of personal statements were additionally supported by subject teachers, advisors from a local university and student services. Students described feeling well supported with the UCAS application process:

Everything was done really quickly […] we had just done it and it was done. Yeah it was really quite easy. And help with our personal statements too. Like ‘cause we wrote them, then our teachers looked at them and then another member of staff looked at them and then we had people from (a local university) come in to look for what they look for in personal statements. So they were done like perfectly

(Sixth Form: BTEC Applied Science).

The “people rich” (Gale et al., 2010) environment at the Sixth Form College appeared to have helped students access more “cold” and formal sources of information (Smith, 2011). Two students, for example, discussed how the cohort sizes at different universities and numbers attending lectures had influenced their university choice. These closely knit and cohesive networks “convey a clarity and consistency of identity expectations” (Ibarra, 2007, p. 14) to young people. The ongoing and varied opportunities to discuss possible HE and career identities with teachers, tutors, mentors and other advisors facilitated a detailed elaboration and articulation of possible selves on specific courses and at particular universities.

Key events—careers events and visits to universities

The transition from school to college was clearly a key event, instigating thinking about new possible selves for all students interviewed. A difference between the two institutions was students’ access to careers fairs and university visits. These events were arranged and actively encouraged for students at the Sixth Form College, whilst students at the FE College described having to navigate such events independently. Such visits were often viewed by students as key events in their decisions about choice of courses, subjects and institutions.

One student described how a college trip to a careers convention at a local university had enabled him to differentiate between the courses different universities offered. Following this he had attended an open day and experienced a taster session which had confirmed his choice:

I’d never heard of [his chosen university] before at all ‘cause I was checking out online about other universities ‘cause I really wanted to do music business […] and then I got the option to go to a trip to (local university) and they had a lot of stands for all the universities in England […] and they told me all about it and I absolutely loved the idea of it […] I went a couple of weeks later. I went on an open day and I went all the way down to Brighton and I checked it out and I just loved it as well. It’s such a nice place. I checked out the business course so you have to sit there for like an hour and just have a test of the lesson and I really enjoyed that as well and I really enjoyed the whole area

(Sixth Form: BTEC Music Technology).

Students at the Sixth Form College widely discussed attending careers fairs and a range of other visits to HEIs including summer schools and taster sessions. Some of these activities had provided genuine insights into courses and learning and teaching approaches. Typically, one student’s account illustrated how a taster session and talking to student ambassadors had provided information about the demands of lectures and the organisation of the course:

The main lecturer of the criminology course […] gave a lecture […] it was very in depth and you would have to be quick with the typing and the writing of it all […] but speaking to other students, who […] have either done it or finishing or leaving for other things. In the first year they make you do between four to ten hours of lectures in the week and then you spend probably another thirty doing your own work by yourself

(Sixth Form: BTEC Forensic Science).

These experiences played an important part in students’ detailed articulation of HE possible selves and this clarity served to motivate their engagement with their BTEC courses. A number of students discussed closely monitoring their performance on their BTEC courses to ensure that they achieved the distinctions necessary to take up university places offered.

BTEC a vehicle for social mobility? Limitations and constraints

Forming positive learner identities and possible future selves as HE students during BTEC courses can support students to progress to HE. However, a series of measures is needed to redress existing inequalities. There is a need to address eligibility issues. While BTEC qualifications have value as “legally guaranteed qualifications” (Bourdieu, 1986, p. 247), they are not equally valued in the field of HE. BTEC students occupy different positions in this field to peers with A level qualifications. Students who undertake BTEC courses are predominantly located in post-92 universities (Shields and Masardo, 2015; Kelly, 2017; Gicheva and Petrie, 2017). This orientation was reflected in the HE destinations of students contributing to this study, though a small number of students on mixed A level/BTEC routes at the Sixth Form College had received offers from traditional universities. Research has highlighted degree courses in post-92 universities are unlikely to offer the same graduate career destinations as traditional universities and have a lower wage premium (Gale and Parker, 2015; Kelly, 2017), though Gicheva and Petrie (2018) point to a wage premium associated with a BTEC route through university in some regions and industries.

Another issue with BTEC courses is these routes into HE are often highly gendered: of those interviewed, girls were progressing from BTEC health and social care courses into related HE courses such as nursing, while boys from BTECs in IT were moving into IT at university. Engineering BTEC qualifications undertaken alongside apprenticeships at the FE college were exclusively undertaken by male students. As well as polarising the workforce in these sectors, this segregation has ramifications for gender pay equality. This point to an urgent need for better CEIAG to challenge students’ gendered understandings of career routes.

There were clear differences in students’ accounts of the match between their current BTEC course and course they were planning to pursue at university, with some courses promoting clear progression routes through HE into particular jobs. Kelly (2017) highlights arguments that BTEC students are more suited to applied courses and that Russell Group and other elite institutions offer fewer of these courses than post 1992 institutions. Students’ accounts in this study indicate embodied cultural capital acquired through study on BTEC courses, can be highly relevant for applied courses, but may not be transferrable to other degrees. Gicheva and Petrie (2018) argue for increased support for students to access and succeed in universities to ensure parity of esteem between vocational and traditional academic routes.

A further issue likely to affect HE retention and achievement is that many of these students have well-articulated possible selves outside HE, in the (work) identities of family and friends. While students may view these possible selves negatively, if their experiences of HE proves difficult or disappointing these other identities are likely to present, tempting alternatives. Sixth Form tutors described deliberately countering messages from home. Tutors’ and students’ accounts illustrate the dissonance between the expectations of the Sixth Form College and the familial habitus of some students:

Some of them don’t have a role model in the family. They hear it on the news – media narratives of fees going up and they think that there’s no point going and their parents say you need a job – they’re encouraging the opposite

(Sixth Form: Teacher).

Students’ HE identities are likely to be fragile which supports calls for HEIs to focus on the academic provision and support offered to these students.

Conclusion

Using a joint Boudieusien and possible selves lens in considering students’ accounts provides new insights into how BTECs and colleges support students in their progression to HE. The findings of this study highlight how BTEC pedagogies can support the development of positive learner identities and well-articulated possible selves as HE students amongst young people from lower socio-economic groups, including students who had not considered university as a possibility before starting their BTEC courses. BTEC courses at both colleges provide these young people with relevant social and cultural capital for courses in HE, particularly in applied fields. In light of this study, concerns that BTEC courses are not sufficiently rigorous or standardised and do not properly equip students for HE appear simplistic, overlooking the positive contribution these courses make to students’ academic and social development in relation to HE courses.

The study illustrates that positioning young people within a stratified and marketised post-16 system can be problematic, with the denigration of FE colleges having implications for student’s self-identities as learners. Findings also highlight the importance of practices within colleges, and the opportunities they can provide in facilitating access for young people to relevant cultural and social capital, supporting them in envisioning themselves as HE students. Given the success of BTEC courses in motivating and engaging students from lower socio-economic groups, how courses and institutions support successful learner and HE identities is also of relevance to practices in HE, if HEIs are to ensure these students’ continued success. As Ferrare and Apple (2015) point out, “there are no deficits inherent in the cultural dispositions of students; only deficits in the social relations embedded in the practices and meanings that are constructed within our educational institutions” (p. 46).

References

Appadurai, A. (2004), “The capacity to aspire”, in Rao, V. and Walton, M. (Eds), Culture and Public Action, Stanford University Press, CA, pp. 59-84.

Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Seakins, A. and Wong, B. (2015), “‘Science capital’: a conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending Bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 52 No. 7, pp. 922-948.

Ball, S.J. (2010), “New class inequalities in education: why education policy may be looking in the wrong place! Education policy, civil society and social class”, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 30 Nos 3/4, pp. 155-166.

Bourdieu, P. (1986), “The forms of capital”, in Richardson, J. (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Greenwood, Westport, CT, pp. 241-258.

Brooks, R. (2003), “Discussing higher education choices: differences and difficulties”, Research Papers in Education, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 237-258.

Charmaz (2014), Constructing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed., Sage, London.

Colley, H., Hodkinson, P. and Malcolm, J. (2003), Informality and Formality in Learning: A report for the Learning and Skills Research Centre, Learning and Skills Research Centre, London, available at: http://lllp.iugaza.edu.ps/Files_Uploads/634791628087049086.pdf

Duckworth, V. (2013), Learning Trajectories, Violence and Empowerment Amongst Adult Basic Skills Learners (Monograph: Research in Education), Routledge, London.

Duckworth, V. and Smith, R. (2017), “Further education in England: transforming lives and communities”, Women’s Stories of Empowerment and Empowering, University and College Union, available at: http://transforminglives.web.ucu.org.uk/files/2017/03/Transforming_lives_IWD_Mar17_12pp.pdf (accessed 4 June 2018).

Erikson, M.G. (2007), “The meaning of the future: toward a more specific definition of possible selves”, Review of General Psychology, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 348-358.

Evans, K. (2007), “Concepts of bounded agency in education, work and personal lives of young adults”, International Journal of Psychology (interdisciplinary issue), Vol. 42 No. 2, pp. 1-9.

Ferrare, J.J. and Apple, M.W. (2015), “Field theory and educational practice: Bourdieu and the pedagogic qualities of local field positions in educational contexts”, Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 43-59.

Gale, T. and Parker, S. (2015), “Calculating student aspiration: Bourdieu, spatiality and the politics of recognition”, Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 81-96.

Gale, T., Hattam, R., Comber, B., Tranter, D., Bills, D., Sellar, S. and Parker, S. (2010), Interventions Early in School as a Means to Improve Higher Education Outcomes for Disadvantaged Students, National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education, Adelaide.

Gartland, C. (2014), STEM Strategies: Student Ambassadors and Equality in HE, Trentham Books and IOE Press, London.

Gartland, C. (2015), “Student ambassadors: ‘role-models’, learning practices and identities”, British Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol. 36 No. 8, pp. 1192-1211.

Gartland, C. and Smith, C. (2015), “Towards a connected approach for inclusive and positive transitions into HE”, QAA Subscriber Research project, available at: www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/Subscriber-Research-Inclusive-and-Positive-Transitions-15.pdf (accessed 4 June 2018).

Gicheva, N. and Petrie, K. (2018), “Vocation, vocation, vocation: the role of vocational routes into higher education”, Social Market Foundation, London, available at: www.smf.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/SMF-Vocation-Vocation-Vocation.pdf (accessed 4 June 2018).

Hodgson, A. and Spours, K. (2014), “Middle attainers and 14–19 progression in England: half‐served by new labour and now overlooked by the coalition?”, British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 467-482.

Ibarra, H. (2007), “Identity transitions: possible selves, liminality and the dynamics of voluntary career change”, working paper series, Fontainebleu Cedex, INSEAD.

James, D. (2015), “How Bourdieu bites back: recognising misrecognition in education and educational research”, Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 97-112.

Kelly, S. (2017), “Reforming BTECs: applied general qualifications as a route to higher education”, Report No. 94, Higher Education Policy Institute, Oxford.

Markus, H. and Nurius, P. (1986), “Possible selves”, American Psychologist, Vol. 41 No. 9, pp. 954-969.

Oyserman, D., Bybee, D., Terry, K. and Hart-Johnson, T. (2004), “Possible selves as roadmaps”, Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 130-149.

Reay, D. (2015), “Habitus and the psychosocial: Bourdieu with feelings”, Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 9-23.

Reay, D., Crozier, G. and Clayton, J. (2009), “‘Strangers in paradise’? Working-class students in elite universities”, Sociology, Vol. 43 No. 6, pp. 1103-1121.

Reay, D., Crozier, G. and Clayton, J. (2010), “‘Fitting in’ or ‘standing out’: working‐class students in UK higher education”, British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 107-124.

Reay, D., David, M.E. and Ball, S.J. (2005), Degrees of Choice: Class, Race, Gender and Higher Education, Trentham Books, Stoke on Trent.

Rossiter, M. (2009), “Possible selves and career transition: implications for serving non-traditional students”, The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, Vol. 57 No. 2, pp. 61-71.

Shields, R. and Masardo, A. (2015), Changing Patterns in Vocational Entry Qualifications, Student Support and Outcomes in Undergraduate Degree Programmes, Higher Education Academy, York.

Silva, E. (2001), “‘Squeaky wheels and flat tires’: a case study of students as reform participants”, Forum, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 95-99.

Slack, K., Mangan, J., Hughes, A. and Davies, P. (2014), “‘Hot’, ‘Cold’ and ‘warm’ information and higher education decision making”, British Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 204-223.

Smith, L. (2011), “Experiential ‘hot’ knowledge and its influence on low-SES students’ capacities to aspire to higher education”, Critical Studies in Education, Vol. 52 No. 2, pp. 165-177.

Smith, S., Joslin, H. and Jameson, J. (2015), “Progression of college students in England to higher education”, Research Paper No. 239, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London, available at: www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/460394/BIS-15-531-progression-of-college-students-in-england-to-higher-education.pdf (accessed 4 June 2018).

Stevenson, J. and Clegg, S. (2011), “Possible selves: students orientating themselves towards the future through extracurricular activity”, British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 231-246.

Further reading

Butcher, J., Corfield, R. and Rose-Adams, J. (2012), “Contextualised approaches to widening participation: a comparative case study of two UK universities”, Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 51-70.

Hollway, W. and Jefferson, T. (2012), Doing Qualitative Research Differently: A Psychosocial Approach, Sage, London.

Thomas, L. and Quinn, J. (2006), First Generation Entry into Higher Education, McGraw-Hill Education, Maidenhead.

Corresponding author

Clare Elizabeth Gartland can be contacted at: c.gartland@uos.ac.uk