Scuba diving tourism and the challenge of sustainability: evidence from an explorative study in North African-Mediterranean countries

Iacopo Cavallini (Department of Economics and Management, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy)
Daniela Marzo (Department of Economics and Management, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy)
Luisa Scaccia (Department of Economics and Law, University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy)
Sara Scipioni (Department of Economics and Management, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy)
Federico Niccolini (Department of Political Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy)

EuroMed Journal of Business

ISSN: 1450-2194

Article publication date: 25 April 2023

3467

Abstract

Purpose

Scuba diving tourism is reputed to be a potential low-impact recreational activity that allow environmental conservation and socioeconomic benefits for local communities. Few studies have addressed the issue of sustainability of scuba diving tourism through the simultaneously investigation on the economic and socio-cultural aspects and its implications for tourism development. This study aims to examine the scuba diving tourism in three under-explored North African tourism destinations with high ecotourist potential. The authors present an exploratory picture of scuba diving tourist demand, divers' preferences, motivations for recreational diving experiences and their propensity towards conservation.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors developed a case study research strategy collecting profile data on 123 divers. Furthermore, regression analysis was performed to investigate the divers' preferences, motivations and propensity towards conservation.

Findings

The divers' limited number, the presence of mainly local seasonal tourists and a moderate propensity towards conservation influence the potential of the diving tourism segment to generate significant socioeconomic benefits for local sustainable development in these destinations. However, establishing a marine protected area (MPA) could foster the development of a long-term strategy for scuba diving tourism, improve conservation awareness and increase divers' satisfaction.

Practical implications

Diverse profiles, preferences and motivations can provide tools to sustainably manage and preserve coastal and marine biodiversity, while also maximising the quality of the recreational experience. One of the most effective site-based strategies to orient the diving sector towards sustainability involves the design and strengthening of MPAs.

Originality/value

The research provides an original contribution to the debate on sustainable tourism strategies by demonstrating how the study of economic and socio-cultural aspects of scuba diving could provide guidelines to orient the tourism development of marine and coastal areas towards the principles of sustainability (also through the establishment of MPAs). The findings present an overview of the sustainability of the scuba diving tourism segment by investigating the preferences, motivations and inclination towards conservation among tourists for whom the diving experience is not a core holiday activity.

Keywords

Citation

Cavallini, I., Marzo, D., Scaccia, L., Scipioni, S. and Niccolini, F. (2023), "Scuba diving tourism and the challenge of sustainability: evidence from an explorative study in North African-Mediterranean countries", EuroMed Journal of Business, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-04-2022-0085

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Iacopo Cavallini, Daniela Marzo, Luisa Scaccia, Sara Scipioni and Federico Niccolini

License

Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode


1. Introduction

The environmental and cultural attributes of tourist destinations attract numerous visitors. This can often result in increased tourism infrastructure and, in some cases, environmental degradation (Stefănica et al., 2021). Sustainable tourism is a holistic managerial perspective that provides environmental conservation and socioeconomic benefits for local communities (McNaughton et al., 2020; Del Vecchio et al., 2022). According to this viewpoint, a tourism destination can be sustainable if it serves the demands of present and future tourists, as well as those of residents (Nadalipour et al., 2019). In marine and coastal areas, scuba diving has attracted increasing interest within the broader segment of sustainable tourism. Although the diving industry has spread globally, many of its most popular destinations are in developing countries (Townsend, 2008). Scuba diving is a potential low-impact recreational activity, while positively impacting environmental conservation, generating revenue and supporting local communities (Arcos-Aguilar et al., 2021). However, some authors have questioned the feasibility of scuba diving destinations to provide satisfying recreational experiences for tourists (Marconi et al., 2020) and support the well-being of local communities (Wongthong and Harvey, 2014; Emang et al., 2020).

An empirical case study is presented, drawing an exploratory picture of the sustainability of scuba diving tourism in three North African tourist destinations located in two under-explored nations (Algeria and Tunisia). Scuba diving segments have developed in these regions due to their biodiversity and richness of marine species and ecosystems (Niccolini et al., 2019). Specifically, we aimed to (1) describe divers' demographics and the characteristics of the scuba diving segment; (2) study divers' motivations and preferences and explore factors underlying dive site selection; (3) identify variables associated with positive attitudes towards conservation; and (4) investigate the implications of a sustainability-oriented strategy. The debate around the sustainability of scuba diving tourism is conducted by focusing on the recreational underwater experience of the dive tourists. The findings will contribute to outline the divers' profiles, as well as provide a knowledge base for the diving sector. Furthermore, the results are relevant to understand how sustainable tourism can help to restore and conserve coastal and marine ecosystems by managing the interdependent goals of recreation and resource conservation. Understanding the social science dimension of recreational underwater experiences will ultimately improve sustainability, helping policymakers and managers in the process of development of effective management of scuba diving tourism destinations.

Despite extensive academic contributions and field research on scuba diving tourism, few studies have provided a comprehensive picture of the sustainability of this niche market (Dimmock and Musa, 2015). To date, there is a general lack of academic literature that simultaneously focuses on the economic and sociocultural aspects of sustainable diving tourism and its implications. Furthermore, few studies have examined motivations and propensity towards conservation of tourists for whom underwater experience is not the core activity of the holiday, but one of the many carried out during their holidays (Albayrak et al., 2021). Moreover, the tourism destinations of our exploratory study lack quantitative data; thus, we investigate the identified under-analysed contexts through replicable quantitative methods. The results of this study may be relevant to understand the role of diving in a sustainability-oriented tourist strategy for under-explored regions.

The rest of the paper is structured as follows: the second section provides a literature review regarding scuba diving tourism and the issue of sustainability of this tourism segment; the third section presents the case study description, while the fourth and fifth sections discuss the methodology adopted and the data analysis description. Then, the main findings of the research are presented in section six. Section seven describes theoretical and managerial implications of the study and conclusions are presented in section eight.

2. Literature review

Sustainability in tourism is a paradigm that researchers and practitioners have long debated (Bramwell and Lane, 1993; Koens et al., 2009; Mondino and Beery, 2018; Wondirad et al., 2020). Ecotourism, nature-based tourism, heritage tourism come from the management perspective of sustainable tourism (Zolfani et al., 2015) and promote a win-win scenario (Ardoin et al., 2015) in which the visitors are guaranteed a quality experience, the living standards for local communities are improved, and an ecologically oriented and profit-generating activity is promoted (Lim and McAleer, 2005). A broad spectrum of academic study focuses on tourists' connection with the recreational environment, paying attention to the cognitive aspects and social psychological drivers behind the adoption of a pro-environmental behaviour (Imran et al., 2014; Martin et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2018).

In coastal and marine destinations, divers are often the main or at least a relevant category of ecotourists (Lucrezi et al., 2017) as they contribute to generating economic benefits, especially in contexts characterised by peripheral, mono-structured economies (Garrod and Gössling, 2008). In the past two decades, many researchers have conducted studies on scuba diving tourism, which is depicted as a young, expensive and niche sector focused on the enjoyment of underwater marine environment and wildlife (Dimmock and Musa, 2015). According to Hodeck et al. (2021), the sustainability of scuba diving tourism is an important factor to consider with regard to a tourist destination's competitive advantage (Apostolakis et al., 2015; Nadalipour et al., 2019). Thus, scuba diving achieves sustainable outcomes and effective tourism management (Plummer and Fennell, 2009). To address the issue of a scuba diving tourist destination's sustainability, it is useful to consider the academic literature related to environmental, economic and socio-cultural aspects (Marconi et al., 2020).

Sustainable scuba diving tourism begins with marine conservation. The richness and variety of marine biodiversity increase the attractiveness of a scuba diving tourism destination, which represents the main motivation for a dive (Edney, 2012). A particularly prolific branch of research has explored divers' impacts on the natural environment (Nurbaidura et al., 2013; Hammerton, 2017; Giglio et al., 2015, 2018; Lucrezi et al., 2019, 2021; Edney et al., 2021), highlighting future implications for biodiversity and, consequently, the loss of the tourist destination's appeal (Musa and Dimmock, 2013). Nurbaidura et al. (2013) examine the relationship between divers' specialisation and underwater behaviour, while Lucrezi et al. (2019) investigate the influence of the divers' experiences on their perceptions of the environment's health. Ong and Musa (2012) studied the impact of divers' experience and personality in explaining their underwater behaviour. Some studies have focused on how effective interpretation and educational strategies promote pro-environmental behaviours (Townsend, 2008; Johansen, 2013; Hammerton, 2017; Giglio et al., 2018). This information is critical to manage diving destinations.

Musa and Dimmock (2013) provide evidence of the economic contribution of diving tourism to local development. The growing popularity of scuba diving destinations in Thailand, Australia and Malaysia has prompted researchers to investigate tourist demand for scuba diving experiences and issues related to the assessment of its economic value (Arcos-Aguilar et al., 2021). Strategies to increase revenue and better manage scuba diving destinations and preserve and enhance biodiversity are increasingly needed. Studies, such as those by Schuhmann et al. (2013, 2019), Emang et al. (2016), Trujillo et al. (2016), have investigated the factors that drive the willingness to finance conservation projects.

Other studies have focused on key aspects (such as preferences, motivations and expectations) related to tourists' perception of the underwater environment and their inclination towards environmental conservation (Cater, 2008; Dodds et al., 2010; Wong et al., 2013; Hermoso et al., 2019). Albayrak et al.’s (2021) study on holiday tourists who had scuba diving experiences in Kemer, Antalya-Turkey, shows that “exploration” and “excitement to dive” are the key push motivations, while “safe” and “accessibility” are the most important pull motivations. Certain authors have explored the attributes of scuba diving experiences that affect satisfaction (Mundet and Ribera, 2001; Musa, 2002; Musa et al., 2006; Suardana, 2016; Marconi et al., 2020; Cater et al., 2021). The literature review reveals that most of these authors have depicted the divers' socio-demographic profile with a non-homogeneous diving segment and differences in preferences, motivations and experience levels (Edney, 2017). Examining divers' motivations and preferences could inform the development of sustainable tourism strategies to manage the interdependent goals of recreation and resource conservation.

3. Research context

Our study was conducted in three areas along the North African coast in the southern Mediterranean ecoregion, the Taza and Gouraya National Parks in Algeria and the Tabarka Marine and Coastal Area in Tunisia (Figure 1).

The three tourist destinations are suffering environmental degradation related to a rapid growth of development without any formal planning. These areas were selected specifically as case study (Yin, 2003; Xiao and Smith, 2006) worthy of research for a number of reasons (Niccolini et al., 2019): (1) Owing to their unique biodiversity, these three areas have the potential to become major marine ecotourism attractions; (2) The diving sector offers the opportunity to promote ecotourism activities and stimulate local sustainable development; (3) These areas have recently experienced large-scale tourism development, which could compromise the conservation of marine and coastal ecosystems if it is not properly regulated; (4) All three tourist destinations have yet to finalise the institutional process of fully establishing a marine protected area (MPA). Table 1 presents a summary of key institutional, legal and managerial aspects.

In addition, the case study approach has been chosen as suitable methodology to understand and deepen complex phenomena (Larsson, 1993; Stake, 1995) such as the promotion of sustainable oriented strategies and practices in destinations affected by strong coastal mass tourism. More precisely, the case study methodology applied to these three tourist destinations in North Africa allows the investigator to define which are the main factors (linked to the three pillars of sustainability) that could have an impact on the sustainability of diving tourism. Starting from the description of processes and results achieved in real contexts characterized by particular socio-cultural and economic dynamics linked to tourism development, the case study methodology allows to learn management tools to guide tourism development towards paths of sustainability.

4. Materials and methods

Due to the exploratory nature of this study, we did not consider the use of random sampling techniques essential. Given the time and resource constraints, we chose convenience sampling (Bailey, 1994; Bohrnstedt and Knoke, 1994), a method that is used when direct relationships with members of the target population and a greater propensity for collaboration from participants can be relied upon (Etikan et al., 2016). A quantitative method has been adopted for research design and analysis. Within the case study framework, data were collected through a questionnaire administered to scuba diving tourists after their recreational diving experience at the three tourist destinations. The interviewers approached the divers and asked them whether they would participate in the questionnaire. Before administering the questionnaire, they explained the study aims and clarified that the data would be anonymous. A total of 167 questionnaire were printed and distributed to divers. Analysis was limited to respondents who completed all questions in the questionnaire. We received 123 valid responses during two sampling periods: August 2017 and March to October 2018. Of the 123 completed questionnaires, 31 came from Gouraya, 48 from Taza and 44 from Tabarka. The response rate was 74%. The exploratory nature of the research is connected to the lack of literature and data on the three geographic areas considered and the relative difficulty in obtaining a representative sample of the target tourists at these destinations. In these areas, scuba diving is practiced by a relatively small number of tourists, who are not always willing to be interviewed, particularly after a diving experience. Therefore, gathering information through individual interviews for this study has been costly and time-consuming. Thus, the data collected in this study are valuable and extremely useful to outline the first cognitive representation of the local diving segment.

We developed a questionnaire comprised of five parts that took approximately 15 min. The first part was aimed at gathering information about the key features of the travel experience, including the place of stay and reason for visiting. Certain questions linked the diving experience to the MPA concept, such as respondents' awareness levels related to conservation issues and more general issues regarding future MPAs. The second section focuses on nature-based experiences and the factors that affect respondents' choice of diving site. The third section gathers information on scuba divers' expenditure. The fourth section explores divers' willingness to pay (WTP), in addition to their usual expenses, to fund sustainability initiatives, including marine conservation projects, and how they would allocate these funds. The final section collected general demographic information such as age, occupation, nationality and education. The questionnaire is available in both French and English (Table 1, Supplementary Material). The items of the questionnaires have been developed by the authors after a comprehensive review of the related literature (Eagles, 1992; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005; Tao et al., 2004). They have been modified to be applicable to the study context and to cover dimensions related to the attitudes towards the MPA establishment. In the process of questionnaire design, we interviewed and consulted five university academicians with scuba diving experience in the three areas under study to test the construct validity of the instrument. Before starting the survey, we organized a pre-testing to assess the clarity of the questionnaire. The only issue encountered during this phase was related to the different approaches used in the questionnaires' administration. Therefore, to avoid future misunderstanding, we shared guidelines for all the involved interviewers.

5. Data analysis

Our analysis focused on the economic and sociocultural aspects of sustainable scuba diving tourism, as we recognise that marine biology and ecology scholars have largely explored the divers' impact on the natural environment.

First, we conducted a descriptive analysis of scuba divers' profiles with respect to socio-demographic characteristics, motivations and preferences for dive site selection. In addition, we analysed divers' motivations for spending time and money on an underwater experience to provide an explorative evaluation of the contribution of scuba diving to the local economy. On the other hand, divers' spending behaviour can influence the profitability of the scuba diving tourism destination. This approach allows to identify the extent to which scuba diving can contribute to the well-being of the local community (Saayman and Saayman, 2018). R software (R Core Team, 2019) was used to analyse the collected data on motivations and preferences for dive site choice, and divers' propensity towards conservation. The divers were profiled using summary statistics, and the relationships between variables were investigated using graphical analysis and regression models. The dependent variables were as follows:

  1. Choice of diving site: Six dummy variables were set up from the responses to a question related to the first three motivations and preferences that affected the respondent's choice of diving site.

  2. WTP: based on the respondent's desire to fund conservation projects.

We treated the motivations for choosing a particular diving site and WTP as inextricably interrelated, because both are partly driven by the propensity towards conservation, which is unobservable. Divers with greater environmental propensity are expected to choose a diving site for its natural beauty and, equally, be willing to fund conservation projects. Therefore, the motivations for choosing a diving site emerge as predictors in the regression model, which explains the WTP level and vice versa. This was performed in a simple exploratory manner without any claim of causality.

The definitions of all independent and dependent variables considered in the analysis are provided in Table 2.

6. Results

6.1 Scuba diving tourist demand: demographic and socio-economic factors

As demonstrated in Table 3, the profile of the typical divers in all three destinations is young, highly educated and employed. The majority of respondents were aged between 31 and 40 years across all destinations (52% in Gouraya, 56% in Taza and 34% in Tabarka), followed by those between 21 and 30 years in Gouraya (29%) and Tabarka (23%), and between 41 and 50 years in Taza (21%). The three destinations primarily received domestic tourists (97% in Gouraya, 62% in Taza and 77% in Tabarka), albeit with few differences. Merely 3% of the divers in Gouraya were foreigners (from France), whereas 38% of those in Taza were international visitors (from France). Approximately 23% of the divers in Tabarka were international tourists, specifically, French (14%), Dutch (5%), German (2%) and Italian (2%). Most respondents in all three destinations had university-level education (84% in Gouraya, 79% in Taza and 75% in Tabarka) and were employed (61% in Gouraya, 50% in Taza and 39% in Tabarka). The most prevalent categories were beginners (77% in Gouraya, 69% in Taza and 86% in Tabarka), followed by those who were moderately experienced in Gouraya (13%), Tabarka (7%) and somewhat experienced in Taza (27%), as shown in Table 4. Only Tabarka has a low percentage of experienced divers (2%).

The analysis of the average number of annual divers in the three tourist destinations (Figure 2) suggests that scuba diving is a niche segment in the early stages of development in Taza and Gouraya with a modest number of annual divers. In Tabarka, the higher number of scuba diving tourists shows the potentially important role of scuba diving in local development towards sustainability.

The underwater experience appears to be one of the holiday activities and is not the focus of the holiday itself. As shown in Table 5, in Gouraya and Taza, the participants reported spending five and seven days on vacation, respectively, of which two or three days were reserved for diving. Although in Tabarka the average duration of stay was longer, only nine days were spent on dives. The respondents were also asked to estimate their approximate holiday expenditure. The results in Table 5 confirm that the diving tourism in Tabarka is more developed and potentially contributes to the local economy.

6.2 Divers’ preferences and motivations

To investigate the divers' preferences and motivations related to the recreational diving experience, each respondent was required to select three different characteristics that influence their choice of diving site from the eight that were listed: “water quality”, “presence of spectacular species”, “abundance and diversity of fish”, “presence of particular underwater scenery”, “safety”, “opportunity to do other activities”, “proximity to accommodation”, “presence of a protected area (to be established)”.

The data show that the respondents appreciated the natural aspects of the site, and in particular, water quality and the presence of underwater scenery were the most important factors driving their choice in 22% and 21% of cases, respectively (Table 6). A certain importance was also given to the safety factor, especially in Gouraya and Taza, where it was identified as a key factor by 25% and 19% of the divers, respectively. By contrast, most divers in Tabarka do not consider safety as a determining feature when choosing a diving site.

Figure 3 depicts the analysis for each of the eight characteristics selected by the entire sample and separately for beginners and non-beginners (somewhat experienced, moderately experienced and experienced divers are collapsed into a single category because of their low frequency in the sample). As expected, the degree of experience affected divers' preferences. Considered together, the trio of characteristics, water quality, safety and proximity to accommodation constituted the most selected for beginners (19%) and one of the least selected for non-beginners (4%), making this trio the most valuable to beginners. In contrast, 36% of non-beginners selected the presence of specific underwater scenery and spectacular species and the abundance and diversity of fish as more relevant characteristics compared to 6% of beginners, making it the preferred trio for the more experienced category. Interestingly, the presence of a protected area is rarely considered a choice-driving characteristic that is independent of the degree of experience.

To deepen the investigation of divers' preferences and motivations related to recreational diving experiences and their association with other variables that describe the travel experience, divers' degree of awareness of conservation issues and their demographic characteristics, a logistic regression model was applied to the data. Each characteristic influencing the choice of diving site was considered as a dependent variable and converted into a dummy variable with a value of one if the respondent selected it and zero otherwise. “Opportunity to do other activities” and “presence of a protected area” were excluded from the analysis because very few respondents chose them, which unbalanced the sample for both variables. The independent variables considered as predictors are listed in Table 2. A stepwise procedure was used to determine independent variables that best explained the probability of selecting a particular characteristic. The results of the analysis are summarised in Table 7. The intercept was included in each model; however, it was not reported owing to space constraints.

As noted in Figure 3, dive choice preferences related to appreciation of natural beauty and scenery are mostly expressed by expert divers. The independent variable “diver experience”, expressed as the number of dives per year, displays a positive and significant influence on the probability of selecting “spectacular species”, “abundance and diversity of fish” and “underwater scenery” as motivations for choosing the diving site. In contrast, it has a negative and significant effect on the motivations “water quality” and “safety”, thereby reducing their probability of being selected. Its effect on selecting “proximity to the accommodation” is also negative, albeit only slightly significant (p value < 0.1). WTP is another relevant variable that explains the motivation for choosing a diving site. A higher WTP is associated with a significantly higher probability of choosing a site for its underwater scenery and its abundance and diversity of fish and a significantly smaller probability of choosing it for its proximity to the accommodation. This finding underscores the link between divers' appreciation of natural beauty and the importance they attach to conservation projects. Moreover, divers who are willing to fund MPA management projects that support scientific research have a significantly higher probability of choosing a diving site for its spectacular species and a slightly lower probability of choosing it because of its water quality or proximity to accommodation. However, the diving site selection attributed to the knowledge of the MPA establishment has a less clear link with divers' preferences. In fact, it indicates contrasting relationships with two naturalistic motivation features: a positive correlation with the presence of spectacular species and a negative correlation with underwater scenery.

6.3 Propensity towards conservation

Propensity towards conservation is a broad concept that encompasses multiple sociocultural aspects related to divers' tendency to have positive attitudes towards conservation (Dodds et al., 2010). We explore the association between key variables that contribute to positive attitudes towards conservation, such as divers' motivation and preferences, WTP and MPA awareness. Findings from statistical analyses are useful to assess divers' propensity towards conservation and make managerial considerations.

The top panel in Figure 4 represents the distribution of WTP for divers who selected a diving site based on the establishment of an MPA and those who did not. Divers who value the establishment of an MPA indicate a greater WTP and a higher probability to pay up to 15 euros more to fund conservation projects in addition to the usual diving expenses. Similarly, the bottom panel of Figure 4 presents the WTP distribution, which is conditional to the importance attributed to MPAs as a means of protecting the ecosystem. In this case, it is more evident that divers who believe in the efficacy of MPAs have a WTP distribution that shifts towards the right compared to those who do not consider MPAs relevant for ecosystem conservation.

To provide a more detailed description of the key aspects associated with divers' propensity towards conservation, regression analysis was performed to investigate the influence of the variables related to tourists' motivations for dive site choice, their awareness of conservation issues, travel experience and socio-demographic characteristics on WTP. The WTP for conservation project funds is expected to be linked to divers' awareness of conservation issues. In addition, a stepwise procedure was adopted to select the model that best explained the variability observed in WTP. Table 8 presents the results, and Table 2 provides the complete list of variables considered as predictors. As noted above, there is a statistically significant relationship between WTP and the variables related to conservation awareness. Divers who claim that an MPA in the establishment phase has an impact on their choice of diving site are willing to pay on average two euros more than divers who did not make this claim. Similarly, albeit at a lower level of significance, those who believe that MPAs play a role in conservation are willing to pay an average of almost two euros more than those who do not think that the MPA establishment can help protect marine ecosystems.

Additionally, variables related to naturalistic beauty indicate a significant positive effect on WTP. Divers who appreciate the abundance of marine species and underwater scenery are willing to pay an average of three euros more than those who place greater emphasis on other factors of recreational experiences. For visitors' demographic variables, WTP increases with age and is higher for students, which confirms their greater ecological awareness. Finally, divers interviewed in Gouraya have, on average, a WTP three euros more than that of divers in Taza, whereas the WTP of divers in Tabarka is two euros less.

7. Discussion

This study presents the first overall picture of scuba diving tourism in three North African tourist destinations that are characterised by a high ecotourism potential and threatened by growing anthropogenic pressure.

The main question that revolves around this research idea is whether scuba diving at these three destinations can pursue the challenge of sustainable tourism.

As Lucrezi et al. (2017) note, preservation of the marine environment is a key issue for the sustainability of the diving segment. A healthy marine ecosystem attracts divers and provides satisfactory underwater experiences (Nurbaidura et al., 2013). The findings of this study indicate that divers appreciate the natural environment and emphasise safety, which is in line with Albayrak et al. (2021). Data analysis and interpretation allowed us to identify a relation between divers' preferences about site dive choice, the level of experience and WTP. Our study has revealed that preferences of dive site choice vary between divers and depend on their level of experience; firstly, experienced divers are much more interested in seeing marine life as an abundance and diversity of fish, and to discover particular underwater sceneries; secondly, novices view the underwater experience much more as a leisure activity. Similar to other studies, our findings highlight that the natural features of the marine environment are among the most important factors in choosing a dive site for experienced divers (Mundet and Ribera, 2001; Musa, 2002; Musa et al., 2006; Giglio et al., 2015). Several findings in the literature on scuba diving show that experience affects underwater behaviour among divers. Musa et al. (2006) and Ong and Musa (2012) demonstrate that novices are more likely to have a negative impact on a marine ecosystem. Although our exploratory study did not attempt to study the relationship between the level of experience and the underwater behaviour (and, therefore, the possibility that divers harm marine ecosystems), the study of the human dimensions of natural resources can be useful to make some considerations on the importance of the educational aspects and good practices regarding responsible underwater behaviour. As several scholars (Townsend, 2008; Hammerton, 2017; Giglio et al., 2018) have suggested, linking the attractiveness of the diving sector to the fascination of learning about underwater life can promote education to the conservation of underwater ecosystems and a more sustainable orientation of the tourism development, thus enhancing a positive loop that can improve the quality of the underwater recreational experience.

In the three destinations analysed, diving tourism is a relatively new sector, and many divers have little previous experience. The socioeconomic profile reveals the presence of primarily local seasonal tourists who are characterised by short stays or daily visits (Gounden et al., 2020). Furthermore, in line with Albayrak et al. (2021), diving is not the primary motivation for holidays. These findings could affect the ability of diving tourism segments to generate significant socioeconomic benefits for the local community (Niccolini et al., 2019).

Given the above dynamics, the sustainable governance of coastal and marine resources necessitates additional efforts. Therefore, the establishment of an MPA can foster the development of a sustainability-oriented strategy for the scuba diving segment (Lucrezi et al., 2017). This study has several theoretical and managerial implications.

7.1 Theoretical implications

From a theoretical point of view, this study provides an original contribution to the debate on sustainable tourism strategies by demonstrating how the study of economic and sociocultural aspects of scuba diving could provide guidelines to orient the tourism development of marine and coastal areas towards the principles of sustainability (Dimmock and Musa, 2015). According to Lucrezi et al. (2019), tourists' motivations for and preferences regarding recreational experiences influence how natural resources can be protected and managed, becoming key elements in the development of a sustainable tourism strategy. Therefore, an overall assessment of the sustainability of the diving tourism segment should be accompanied by a preliminary background on the visitors' profiles to shape strategies and plans in order to strike a more equitable balance between the ecological, economic and tourism interests for marine conservation (Dodds et al., 2010). This approach provides an opportunity to qualify tourism sector through tourist segmentation, enhancing its long-term sustainable development.

7.2 Managerial implications

This study offers several managerial implications as well. The richness and variety of biodiversity preserved by the MPAs attract a wide range of tourists, improve the destination's appeal and positively influence scuba's diving tourist demand. Many of the most popular diving destinations are MPAs and, in some cases, the existence of MPAs increases visitor satisfaction (Lucrezi et al., 2021). The results reveal the relationships between the opportunity to observe the richness and variety of underwater life and a greater willingness to fund conservation projects. Divers who appreciate the abundance and variety of marine species and enjoy discovering specific underwater scenarios during their recreational experiences are willing to allocate funds for biodiversity conservation.

We found that the greater the knowledge of MPA establishment at these three destinations, the higher the level of WTP. Additionally, greater WTP is observed among those who believe that MPAs are important for marine conservation. Several studies emphasise that the implementation of a user fee system not only enhance effective marine conservation and sustainable funding for MPAs (Schuhmann et al., 2013, 2019; Emang et al., 2016; Trujillo et al., 2016) but also provide economic benefits for the local community.

People with a high conservation propensity who are aware of MPA missions and roles are more likely to support biodiversity conservation, as shown in other studies (LaRiviere et al., 2014; Yu et al., 2018). MPA authorities, in collaboration with academic institutions and NGOs, can play an important role in disseminating the importance of preserving the biodiversity divers appreciate during their recreational experience and raising awareness of the positive impacts related to marine conservation (Lucrezi et al., 2017). In Taza and Gouraya, the terrestrial national park authorities have established formal collaborations with local NGOs and diving centres to share the responsibility of implementing education and awareness-raising programs and co-manage underwater trails for snorkelers. In Tabarka, NGOs and local diving centres within the border of the future MPA designed a voluntary regulation zone for diving (World Wildlife Fund [WWF] Mediterranean, 2020). These socioeconomic findings, together with a moderate divers' propensity towards conservation, imply that the establishment of an MPA can be helpful in leading the local scuba diving tourism segment towards the valorisation and sustainability of marine and coastal resources.

7.3 Research recommendations

This research highlights the relevance of studying the scuba diving sector from a systemic perspective that encompassed the environmental, economic and socio-cultural aspects.

Based on our findings, we recommend the stakeholders involved in the management of the marine environment to improve collaboration and knowledge sharing in a way that benefit the entire scuba diving sector. The creation of an MPA could incorporate the different stakeholders' perspectives, improving effective management practices and promoting sustainable futures. These results and implications would be useful for policymakers and local institutional actors to design MPA-related strategies oriented to the diving sector. Specifically, our indications would help increase the potential contribution of divers and related stakeholders to the sustainable development of the investigated locations, as well as in other areas where the MPA establishment process is underway.

8. Conclusions

In this exploratory study, we examined the demand for scuba diving tourism and its suitability to contribute to the conservation of valuable local marine biodiversity.

In recent years, the three analysed tourist destinations, Taza, Gouraya and Tabarka, have experienced growing domestic mass tourist development that could have a negative impact on marine and coastal ecosystems, which are of high value, so much so that they are the subject of a process in MPA establishment. Our findings reveal an interesting, albeit embryonic, demand for ecotourism experiences with a specific analysis of divers' profiles; in particular, we highlight an increasing number of domestic visitors interested in diving activities. Therefore, there is a clear need to identify tools for sustainable management and preservation of coastal and marine biodiversity (Hayes et al., 2017; Ayad, 2021). This study highlights the need to maintain the attractiveness of the marine ecosystem as a starting point for sustainable development, not only of the diving sector but also of the entire tourist destination. Those interested in promoting sustainable tourism should attempt to understand the real benefits that diving could bring to the local economy and competitiveness of the destination (Nadalipour et al., 2019). The lack of tools and structures to develop an effective natural resource conservation strategy could lead to the unsustainable development of mass scuba tourism, as is happening in some tourist areas in the Red Sea (Shaalan, 2005). To effectively activate the process of sustainable scuba diving tourism development, however, a “start-up, leap forward” should be made by creating MPA authorities and providing them with adequate human and financial capacities (Gill et al., 2017). This can enable them to activate not only enforcements and scientific monitoring but also proactive programs of education and key stakeholder engagement for sustainable development. In this scenario, a positive loop can be initiated, whereby the scuba diving sector is progressively implemented and plays a specific role in orienting the local tourism system in a more sustainable and conservation-oriented direction.

8.1 Limitations and future research

This study has some limitations. The small sample size of divers, owing to a general lack of data on the reference population, and time and resource constraints, influenced the representativeness of the study findings, thus, restricting an in-depth comparative analysis between the three case studies. The findings may also be subject to respondent bias and acquiescence and social desirability effects, particularly for issues regarding conservation awareness and WTP. It is difficult to gauge how respondents think about MPA; moreover, some questions may have been misunderstood or may have generated a positive response because it is considered more socially acceptable. To limit the respondents' bias, surveys were administered by qualified researchers who might have resolved the eventual unclear interpretations of the questions.

Further studies could extend this analysis to a larger sample size to test its representativeness. We also suggest expanding the analysis to encompass other recreational users of marine environments, such as snorkelers and recreational fishers. This study was limited to a few explanatory variables; therefore, the next step could be to build a more elaborate model of explanatory variables that might explain the propensity towards conservation and MPAs.

Finally, the present study focused on a survey in three North African tourist destinations that are experiencing a growing mass tourism and finalising the process to establishing an MPA. On the other hand, the analytical approach of this study may not be applicable to other scuba diving tourism destinations that have already ending the MPA establishment phase but have not been able to implement sustainable-oriented tourism strategies. Future research should compare different scuba diving tourist destinations at different stages of MPA establishment process to further validate the results. Moreover, further research needs to deepen the suitability of the “Western idea” of MPA for resources conservation in explaining tourism internal dynamics and human well-being in developing countries.

Figures

Location of the study's three destinations: Gouraya, Taza and Tabarka

Figure 1

Location of the study's three destinations: Gouraya, Taza and Tabarka

Average number of annual divers

Figure 2

Average number of annual divers

Selection percentages of different characteristics influencing the choice of diving site across the whole sample and for beginner and non-beginner divers

Figure 3

Selection percentages of different characteristics influencing the choice of diving site across the whole sample and for beginner and non-beginner divers

Sample distribution of the WTP, conditional to the importance attached to the establishment of an MPA when choosing the diving site (top panel) and the relevance given to MPAs for ecosystem conservation (bottom panel)

Figure 4

Sample distribution of the WTP, conditional to the importance attached to the establishment of an MPA when choosing the diving site (top panel) and the relevance given to MPAs for ecosystem conservation (bottom panel)

Key aspects of the three case studies

GourayaTazaTabarka
Area7,842 ha on the western side of the Gulf of Bejaïa, part of the municipality of Bejaïa9,603 ha on the north-east coast of Algeria327,855 ha on the north-west coast of Tunisia
Ecosystem of international relevanceMediterranean Sea shore ecosystem, cliffs, beaches and sea caves, marine algaeMarine and terrestrial ecosystem with rocky coast, sandy beaches, grottos and springs; underwater columnar basaltRemarkable biological richness thanks to the presence of rare Mediterranean species; underwater landscape that alternates between posidonia meadows on rocks and sand, photophilous algae and gorgonians
Representative marine speciesSperm whales, harbour porpoises, some dolphinsColonies of different types of corals (black, red) and precious algae forestsTursiops truncates, Delphinus delphis, Stenella coeruleoalba, Pinna nobilis, Cystoseira caespitosa, Cystoseira compressa
Major threatsAnthropogenic pressure due to its proximity to the city of Bejaïa (184,000 inhabitants), consistent port traffic and mass tourism in the summer monthsOver-exploitation of marine resources like fish, corals and shells; mass tourism in the summerCoral exploitation and marketing, poaching, large numbers of boaters and divers; increased anthropogenic pressure with the creation of a track that connects the village of Maaloula to its bay
Tourism key featuresMainly domestic, seaside and seasonal tourism (3 million visitors annually)Mainly domestic, seaside and seasonal tourism; consistent flow of visitors (7 million) in the Jijelian coastal regionSeaside and seasonal tourism, with the presence of both national and international tourists (Slovaks, Czechs, Algerians)
Official international recognitionUNESCO – Biosphere Reserve (2004)UNESCO – Biosphere Reserve
Legal date of establishment (gazetted, for terrestrial areas)Decree no 84-327 of 3 November 1984: “Création du Parc National de Gouraya (Wilaya de Bejaïa)”Decree no 84-328 of 3 November 1984: “Création du Parc National de Taza et de Banc des Kabyles Marine Reserve”Projected
Legal national frameworkLaw no 11-02 (PAs classification and management)
Law no 02-02 (protection of the coastal areas)
Law no 11-02 (PAs classification and management)
Law no 02-02 (protection of the coastal areas)
Law no 88-20 of 13 April 1988: “Code forestier”
Law no 94-122 of 28 November 1994: “Code de l'aménagement du territoire e de l'urbanisme”
Law no 2009-49 of 20 July 2009: “Aires marines et côtières protégées”
Zoning
  • Area of ecological interest

  • Economic exploitation zone

  • Buffer zone

  • No-take zone

  • Peripheral zone

  • Buffer zone

Projected
Governance authorityDirectorate General of Forests (DGF)Directorate General of Forests (DGF)
Staff capacity
Budget capacity
Management plan

Source(s): Adapted from Niccolini et al. (2019)

Table created by authors

Variable definitions

VariableDescriptionValues
MPA awareness
AWARPAAwareness of the existence of a PA (to be established)1 if Yes, 0 if No/I don't know
PA&DIVEXPERThe existence of a PA (to be established) influences the decision to come and dive here1 if Yes, 0 if No/I don't know
MPA FOR CONSERVThe existence of an MPA ensures ecosystem conservation1 if Yes, 0 if No/I don't know
Preferences/motivations regarding choice of diving site
F_WATQUALWater quality1 if selected, 0 otherwise
F_SPECTSPECSpectacular species1 if selected, 0 otherwise
F_AB&DIVFISHAbundance and diversity of fish1 if selected, 0 otherwise
F_UNDERSCENUnderwater scenery1 if selected, 0 otherwise
F_SAFESafety1 if selected, 0 otherwise
F_OPPACTOpportunity to do other activities1 if selected, 0 otherwise
F_PROXACCProximity to accommodation1 if selected, 0 otherwise
F_PAProtected area1 if selected, 0 otherwise
Willingness-to-pay variable
WTPMaximum amount the respondents would be willing to pay, in addition to the usual expenses, to fund conservation projects of the marine ecosystemNothing, €1–2 per dive, €3–5 per dive, €6–10 per dive, more than €10 per dive
Fund allocation for conservation projects
ENFREGEnforcing regulations1 if selected, 0 otherwise
REDWATPOLLReducing water pollution1 if selected, 0 otherwise
ENVEDUCPromoting environmental education1 if selected, 0 otherwise
SCIENTRESEnhancing monitoring and scientific research1 if selected, 0 otherwise
IMPFACImproving facilities1 if selected, 0 otherwise
STRICTAREAsCreating strict conservation areas1 if selected, 0 otherwise
OTHERACTOther activities1 if selected, 0 otherwise
Divers' characteristics
DEGSKILLNumber of dives per yearQuantitative variable classified, where necessary, as annual average of dives: beginner (1–25), somewhat experienced (26–50), moderately experienced (51–100) and experienced (>100)
LOCSTAYLocation of stayGouraya; Taza; Tabarka
T_TOURType of tourist0 if domestic, 1 if international
AGEAge of the respondentLess than 21 years old, between 21 and 30 years old, between 31 and 40 years old, between 41 and 50 years old, between 51 and 60 years old, over 60 years old
STDEGStudy degreePrimary school certificate, middle school diploma, high school certificate, university degree, postgraduate degree
OCCOccupationFreelance professional, entrepreneur, employee worker, student, retired, other

Note(s): From field survey

Source(s): Table created by authors

Divers' socio-demographic characteristics

VariableTotal sample (%)
(N = 123)
Gouraya (%)
(N = 31)
Taza
(%)
(N = 48)
Tabarka (%)
(N = 44)
Age
Less than 21 years old5211
Between 21 and 30 years old23291923
Between 31 and 40 years old47525634
Between 41 and 50 years old18162116
Between 51 and 60 years old429
Over 60 years old337
Type of tourists
Domestic76976277
International2433823
Occupation
Freelance professional7389
Entrepreneur17132511
Employee worker49615039
Student16131323
Retired5311
Other6647
Study degree
High school certificate1231318
University degree79847975
Postgraduate degree (PhD, Master's degree …)91387

Note(s): From field survey

Source(s): Table created by authors

Divers' level of experience

Level of experienceTotal sample (%)
(N = 123)
Gouraya (%)
(N = 31)
Taza (%)
(N = 48)
Tabarka (%)
(N = 44)
Beginners77776986
Somewhat experienced1510275
Moderately experienced71347
Experienced12

Note(s): From field survey

Source(s): Table created by authors

Information on the holiday features and expenditures

GourayaTazaTabarka
Average length of vacation (days)5720
Average number of diving days during the holiday (days)239
Average expenditure
Annual diving expenditure (€)9192273
Daily diving expenditure101126
Daily accommodation expenditure (€)5533156
Daily food expenditure (€)3726
Daily other expenditure (€)1226

Note(s): From field survey

Source(s): Table created by authors

Factors influencing the choice of diving site (percentage of times each attribute was indicated as the most important motivation for choosing the diving site)

Motivation and preferences of dive site choiceTotal sample (%)
(N = 123)
Gouraya (%)
(N = 31)
Taza (%)
(N = 48)
Tabarka (%)
(N = 44)
Water quality22222223
Spectacular species1215815
Abundance and diversity of fish1451718
Particularly underwater scenery21232318
Safety1625198
Opportunity to do other activities5626
Proximity to accommodation7488
Protected Areas215

Note(s): From field survey

Source(s): Table created by authors

Predictors of motivation for choosing the diving site

Dependent variablePredictorCoefficientStd. Errort-valuep value
Water qualityScientific research−0.8450.443−1.9060.0567
Diver experience−0.0270.010−2.7650.0057**
Model fit statisticsHosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test: χ2 = 5.006, df = 8, p value = 0.757
McFadden pseudo R2: 0.105
Spectacular speciesMPA establishment and decision to dive1.3440.4712.8540.0043**
Diver experience0.0230.0102.3230.0202*
Scientific research0.9500.4542.0930.0363*
Model fit statisticsHosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test: χ2 = 12.374, df = 8, p value = 0.135
McFadden pseudo R2: 0.147
Abundance and
diversity of fish
Diver experience0.0470.0133.5000.0005***
MPA role for ecosystem conservation−1.2870.720−1.7870.0740
Type of tourist (international)0.9610.5001.9230.0545
Gouraya−3.0860.862−3.5800.0003***
WTP0.1640.0672.4470.0144*
Model fit statisticsHosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test: χ2 = 4.300, df = 8, p value = 0.829
McFadden pseudo R2: 0.270
Underwater sceneryMPA establishment and decision to dive−1.2350.494−2.4970.0125*
Diver experience0.0380.0152.5710.0101*
WTP0.1180.0601.9790.0479*
Model fit statisticsHosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test: χ2 = 9.499, df = 8, p value = 0.302
McFadden pseudo R2: 0.123
SafetyDiver experience−0.0480.014−3.4010.0007***
Water pollution reduction1.3180.5162.5550.0106*
Type of tourist (international)0.9470.5441.7420.0816
Occupation (student)1.3570.7201.8850.0594
Gouraya1.6470.6632.4830.0130*
Tabarka−2.3040.615−3.7470.0002***
Model fit statisticsHosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test: χ2 = 10.483, df = 8, p value = 0.233
McFadden pseudo R2: 0.346
Proximity to
accommodation
Awareness of MPA establishment1.7280.7542.2930.0219*
MPA establishment and decision to dive−1.9950.899−2.2180.0265*
Diver experience−0.0410.024−1.7090.0874
Scientific research−1.4450.861−1.6790.0932
Type of tourist (international)−2.1160.832−2.5420.0110*
WTP−2.2220.093−2.3820.0172*
Model fit statisticsHosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test: χ2 = 6.348, df = 8, p value = 0.608
McFadden pseudo R2: 0.346

Note(s): From field survey

Values in italic are significant at the 5% (*), 1% (**) and 1‰ (***) levels

Source(s): Table created by authors

Regression of WTP on marine life preferences, conservation awareness and socio-demographic characteristics

WTPCoefficientStd. Errort-valuep-value
Intercept−2.1451.606−1.3360.1843
Abundance and diversity of fish or underwater scenery3.0150.7544.0000.0001***
MPA establishment and decision to dive2.3370.7533.1020.0024**
MPA role for ecosystem conservation1.9710.9092.1690.0322*
Age0.0880.0332.7010.0080**
Occupation (student/other)2.0510.8052.5480.0122*
Gouraya2.9530.7583.8940.0002***
Tabarka−2.0260.733−2.7630.0067**
Model fit statisticsResidual Standard Error: 3.224 on 115 degrees of freedom
Multiple R2: 0.348
Adjusted R2: 0.309
F-Statistic: 8.783 on 7 and 115 degrees of freedom, p value: 1.274e-08

Note(s): From field survey

Values in italic are significant at the 5% (*), 1% (**) and 1‰ (***) levels

Source(s): Table created by authors

Survey questions related to the demographics and socio-economic characteristics of divers

Motivations and key features of travel experience
VariableSurvey questionsPotential responses
Place of stayWhere are you staying?The town or city as a place of stay
MPA awarenessAre you aware of the existence of a Protected Area (to be established) here?Yes/No
MPA establishment as choice factorDid the existence of a Protected Area (to be established) influence your decision to come and dive here?Yes/No/I don't know
General information on dives
Diving experienceHow many diving experiences did you have this year in total?N° of dives per year
Diving site choice factorsWhat influenced the choice of this dive site? Please, indicate the three most important features98 = missing value
1 = Water quality
2 = Presence of spectacular species (gorgonians, red corals, lobsters , …)
3 = Employee worker
4 = Abundance and diversity of fish
5 = Presence of particular underwater scenery (caves, cliffs)
6 = Safety
7 = Opportunity to do other activities (fishing, trekking, sailing, …)
8 = Proximity to the accommodation
9 = Presence of a protected area (to be established)
MPA role for conservationDo you think the existence of a marine protected area ensures ecosystem conservation?Yes/No/I don't know
Evaluation of logistics and costs
VariableSurvey questionsPotential responses
Type of accommodationWhat type of accommodation did you choose for your stay?98 = missing variable
1 = Hotel
2 = Second home property
3 = Rented house
4 = Camping
5 = Other (specify)
Mean of transportHow did you reach the accommodation?98 = missing variable
1 = By car
2 = By plane
3 = By train
4 = Other (specify)
TravellersHow many people are travelling with you and are sharing the same budget?List #
ExpendituresWhat is approximately the budget for your holiday (considering also the people that travel with you)?List #
Annual expenditures for diving activities (gear, license, insurances, other expenditures)
Daily expenditure of diving
Accommodation expenditures
Daily average expenditures for transportation and parking
Daily average expenditures for food
Other daily expenditures
Willingness to fund conservation projects
VariableSurvey questionsPotential responses
WTP for conservationWhich is the maximum amount you would be willing to pay, in addition to the usual expenses, to fund conservation projects of marine ecosystems?98 = missing variable
1 = Nothing
2 = € 1-2 per dive
3 = € 3-5 per dive
4 = € 6-10 per dive
5 = More than € 10 per dive
Reason for “Nothing”If you answered “Nothing”, please check the reason that fits you best98 = missing variable
1 = No need to promote conservation projects
2 = Ecosystem conservation is a responsibility of the government
3 = Diving has no impact on marine ecosystem
4 = I don't want to have additional financial charges
5 = Other reason (specify)
6 = I don't know
Fund allocationIf you had to decide how to allocate some funds to support marine protected area management projects, how would you distribute these funds over the following activities? Please, indicate the three most important ones98 = missing variable
1 = Enforcing regulations
2 = Reducing water pollution
3 = Promoting environmental education
4 = Enhancing monitoring and scientific research
5 = Improving facilities (restrooms, garbage bins, …)
6 = Creating strict conservation areas
7 = Other activities (specify)
Demographic information
VariableSurvey questionsPotential responses
AgeWhat is your age group?98 = missing value
1 = Less than 21 years old
2 = Between 21 and 30 years old
3 = Between 31 and 40 years old
4 = Between 41 and 50 years old
5 = Between 51 and 60 years old
6 = Over 60 years old
GenderInterviewee's genderMale/Female
Place of residenceWhere do you live?City/State/Province as place of residence
Occupation 98 = missing value
1 = Freelance professional
2 = Entrepreneur
3 = Employee worker
4 = Student
5 = Retired
6 = Other (specify)
Study degreeWhat is your highest level of education completed?98 = missing variable
1 = Primary school certificate
2 = Middle school diploma
3 = High school certificate
4 = University degree – Bachelors or higher
5 = Post Graduate Degree (PhD, Master degree, …)

Source(s): Table created by authors

Frequency distribution of qualitative variables not already provided in the paper

VariableTotal sample (%)
(N = 123)
Gouraya (%)
(N = 31)
Taza (%)
(N = 48)
Tabarka (%)
(N = 44)
ENFREG
Selected73847564
Not selected27162536
REDWATPOLL
Selected48424457
Not selected52585643
ENVEDUC
Selected59425675
Not selected41584425
SCIENTRES
Selected27232334
Not selected73777766
IMPFAC
Selected44524636
Not selected56485464
STRICTAREAs
Selected45585030
Not selected55425070
OTHERACT
Selected2042
Not selected981009698

Source(s): Table created by authors

Summary statistics for quantitative variables

VariableMeanStandard deviationMedianSkewnessKurtosis
Total sample
WTP6.23.95.90.83.4
DEGSKILL17.128.17.03.621.2
AGE35.310.335.70.63.9
Gouraya
WTP8.34.08.00.62.3
DEGSKILL18.1250.37.01.53.9
AGE34.78.835.11.25.4
Taza
WTP5.92.76.40.23.86
DEGSKILL15.117.76.51.23.1
AGE35.270.636.2−0.13.2
Tabarka
WTP5.04.33.91.23.7
DEGSKILL18.537.96.53.516.5
AGE35.913.635.70.42.5

Source(s): Table created by authors

Funding: No specific grant has been provided for the research and publication of this article.

Ethics statement: Ethics approval was not required for this study. No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors. Data has been collected, stored and handled in anonymous form.

Summary: A satisfying scuba diving experience is linked to the appreciation of marine life and healthy ecosystems. This study examines divers' preferences, motivations for recreational diving experiences and their propensity toward conservation in three scarcely explored North Africa tourist destinations. A limited flow of divers, together with a moderate propensity toward conservation, affects the ability of diving tourism segment to generate significant socioeconomic benefits for the local development in these three destinations. However, establishing an MPA could drive the diving sector toward sustainability, improving conservation awareness and increasing the satisfaction of divers.

Supplementary material

Table A1

Table A2

Table A3

References

Albayrak, T., Cater, C. and Caber, M. (2021), “Mass tourism underwater: a segmentation approach to motivations of scuba diving holiday tourists”, Tourism Geographies, Vol. 23 No. 5-6, pp. 985-1000.

Apostolakis, A., Jaffry, S., Sizeland, F. and Cox, A. (2015), “The role of uniqueness in destination branding: the case of historical Portsmouth harbor”, EuroMed Journal of Business, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 198-213.

Arcos-Aguilar, R., Favoretto, F., Kumagai, J.A., Jimenéz-Esquivel, V., Martínez-Cruz, L. and Aburto-Oropeza, O. (2021), “Diving tourism in Mexico-Economic and conservation importance”, Marine Policy, Vol. 126, p. 104410.

Ardoin, N.M., Wheaton, M., Bowers, A.W., Hunt, C.A. and Durham, W.H. (2015), “Nature-based tourism's impact on environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior: a review and analysis of the literature and potential future research”, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Vol. 23 No. 6, pp. 838-858.

Ayad, T.H. (2021), “Dugong based tourism development at the Red Sea: case of Marsa Abu Dabab”, African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 608-622.

Bailey, K.D. (1994), Methods of Social Research, 4th ed., The Free Press, New York, USA.

Bohrnstedt, G.W. and Knoke, D. (1994), Statistics for Social Data Analysis, Peacock Publishers, Itasca.

Bramwell, B. and Lane, B. (1993), “Sustainable tourism: an evolving global approach”, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 6-1.

Cater, C. (2008), “Perceptions of and interactions with marine environments: diving attractions from great whites to pygmy seahorses”, in Garrod, B. and Gössling, S. (Eds), New Frontiers in Marine Tourism: Diving Experiences, Sustainability, Management, Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 49-64.

Cater, C., Albayrak, T., Caber, M. and Taylor, S. (2021), “Flow, satisfaction and storytelling: a causal relationship? Evidence from scuba diving in Turkey”, Current Issues in Tourism, Vol. 24 No. 12, pp. 1749-1767.

Del Vecchio, P., Malandugno, C., Passiante, G. and Sakka, G. (2022), “Circular economy business model for smart tourism: the case of Ecobnb”, EuroMed Journal of Business, Vol. 17 No. 1, p. 88104.

Dimmock, K. and Musa, G. (2015), “Scuba diving tourism system: a framework for collaborative management and sustainability”, Marine Policy, Vol. 54, pp. 52-58.

Dodds, R., Graci, S.R. and Holmes, M. (2010), “Does the tourist care? A comparison of tourists in Koh Phi Grace, Thailand and Gili Trawangan, Indonesia”, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 207-222.

Eagles, P.F. (1992), “The travel motivations of Canadian ecotourists”, Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 3-7.

Edney, J. (2012), “Diver characteristics, motivations, and attitudes: Chuuk Lagoon”, Tourism in Marine Environments, Vol. 8 Nos 1/2, pp. 7-18.

Edney, J. (2017), “Human dimensions of wreck diving and management: case studies from Australia and Micronesia”, Tourism in Marine Environment, Vol. 12 Nos 3-4, pp. 169-182.

Edney, J., Dimmock, K. and Boyd, W.E. (2021), “Diving deeper into wreck diver motivations and attitudes”, Tourism and Hospitality, Vol. 2, pp. 195-217.

Emang, D., Lundhede, T.H. and Thorsen, B.J. (2016), “Funding conservation through use and potentials for price discrimination among scuba divers at Sipadan, Malaysia”, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 182 No. 1, pp. 436-445.

Emang, D., Thorsen, B.J. and Lundhede, T. (2020), “The role of divers' experience for their valuation of diving site conservation: the case of Sipadan, Borneo”, Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, Vol. 32, p. 100237.

Etikan, I., Musa, S.A. and Alkassim, R.S. (2016), “Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling”, American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 1-4.

Garrod, B. and Gössling, S. (Eds) (2008), New Frontiers in Marine Tourism: Diving Experiences, Sustainability, Management, Elsevier, Oxford.

Giglio, V.J., Luiz, O.J., Chadwick, N.E. and Ferreira, C.E. (2018), “Using an educational video briefing to mitigate the ecological impacts of scuba diving”, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Vol. 26 No. 5, pp. 782-797.

Giglio, V.J., Luiz, O.J. and Schiavetti, A. (2015), “Marine life preferences and perceptions among recreational divers in Brazilian coral reefs”, Tourism Management, Vol. 51, pp. 49-57.

Gill, D.A., Mascia, M.B., Ahmadia, G.N., Glew, L., Lester, S.E. and Barnes, M. (2017), “Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally”, Nature, Vol. 543 No. 7647, pp. 665-669.

Gounden, R., Munien, S., Gounden, D. and Perry, N.S. (2020), “Visitor profiles of coastal and marine tourism sites in the Eastern Cape, South Africa”, African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, Vol. 9 No. 6, pp. 1060-1075.

Hammerton, Z. (2017), “Low-impact diver training in management of SCUBA diver impacts”, Journal of Ecotourism, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 69-94.

Hayes, C.T., Baumbach, D.S., Juma, D. and Dunbar, S.G. (2017), “Impacts of recreational diving on hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) behaviour in a marine protected area”, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 79-95.

Hermoso, M.I., Martin, V.Y., Stotz, W., Gelcich, S. and Thiel, M. (2019), “How does the diversity of divers affect the design of citizen science projects?”, Frontiers in Marine Science, Vol. 6, p. 239.

Hodeck, A., Tuchel, J., Hente, L. and Von Reibnitz, C. (2021), “The importance of sustainability in diving tourism – the case of German speaking diving tourists”, Sustainability, Vol. 13, pp. 64-85.

Imran, S., Alam, K. and Beaumont, N. (2014), “Environmental orientations and environmental behaviour: perceptions of protected area tourism stakeholders”, Tourism Management, Vol. 40, pp. 290-299.

Johansen, K. (2013), “Scuba diving education and training”, in Musa, G. and Dimmock, K. (Eds), Scuba Diving Tourism, Routledge, New York, pp. 81-94.

Kim, M.S., Kim, J. and Thapa, B. (2018), “Influence of environmental knowledge on affect, nature affiliation and pro-environmental behaviors among tourists”, Sustainability, Vol. 10 No. 9, p. 3109.

Koens, J.F., Dieperink, C. and Miranda, M. (2009), “Ecotourism as a development strategy: experiences from Costa Rica”, Journal of Environment, Development and Sustainability, Vol. 11 No. 6, pp. 1225-1237.

LaRiviere, J., Czajkowski, M., Hanley, N., Aanesen, M., Falk-Petersen, J. and Tinch, D. (2014), “The value of familiarity: effects of knowledge and objective signals on willingness to pay for a public good”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 68 No. 2, pp. 376-389.

Larsson, R. (1993), “Case survey methodology: quantitative analysis of patterns across case studies”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36 No. 6, pp. 1515-1546.

Lim, C. and McAleer, M. (2005), “Ecologically sustainable tourism management”, Environmental Modeling and Software, Vol. 20 No. 11, pp. 1431-1438.

Lucrezi, S., Ferretti, E., Milanese, M., Sarà, A. and Palma, M. (2021), “Securing sustainable tourism in marine protected areas: lessons from an assessment of scuba divers' underwater behaviour in non-tropical environments”, Journal of Ecotourism, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 165-188.

Lucrezi, S., Milanese, M., Cerrano, C. and Palma, M. (2019), “The influence of scuba diving experience on divers' perceptions, and its implications for managing diving destinations”, PloS One, Vol. 14 No. 7, pp. 1-20.

Lucrezi, S., Milanese, M., Markantonatou, V., Cerrano, C., Sarà, A., Palma, M. and Saayman, M. (2017), “Scuba diving tourism systems and sustainability: perceptions by the scuba diving industry in two Marine Protected Areas”, Tourism Management, Vol. 59, pp. 385-403.

Marconi, M., Giglio, V.J., Pereira Filho, G.H. and Motta, F.S. (2020), “Does quality of scuba diving experience vary according to the context and management regime of marine protected areas?”, Ocean and Coastal Management, Vol. 194, p. 105246.

Martin, V.Y., Weiler, B., Reis, A., Dimmock, K. and Scherrer, P. (2017), “Doing the right thing’: how social science can help foster pro-environmental behaviour change in marine protected areas”, Marine Policy, Vol. 81, pp. 236-246.

McNaughton, M., Rao, L. and Verma, S. (2020), “Building smart communities for sustainable development: community tourism in Treasure Beach Jamaica”, Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 337-352.

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005), Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis, Island Press, Washington, DC.

Mondino, E. and Beery, T. (2018), “Ecotourism as a learning tool for sustainable development. The case of Monviso Transboundary Biosphere Reserve, Italy”, Journal of Ecotourism, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 107-121.

Mundet, L. and Ribera, L. (2001), “Characteristics of divers at a Spanish resort”, Tourism Management, Vol. 22, pp. 501-510.

Musa, G. (2002), “Sipadan: a SCUBA diving paradise: an analysis of tourism impact, diver satisfaction and tourism management”, Tourism Geographies, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 195-209.

Musa, G. and Dimmock, K. (2013), “Scuba diving tourism Introduction to special issue”, Tourism in Marine Environments, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 1-5.

Musa, G., Kadir, S.L.S.A. and Lee, L. (2006), “Layang Laying: an empirical study on scuba divers' satisfaction”, Tourism in Marine Environments, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 89-102.

Nadalipour, Z., Khoshkhoo, M.H.I. and Eftekhari, A.R. (2019), “An integrated model of destination sustainable competitiveness”, Competitiveness Review. An International Business Journal, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 314-335.

Niccolini, F., Marzo, D., Scipioni, S., Randone, M., Hogg, K. and Gomei, M. (2019), Ecosystem Services, Socio-Economic Values and Organizational Profiles of Mediterranean Marine, Protected Areas, Rome.

Nurbaidura, S., Bahauddin, A. and Mohamed, B. (2013), “Influence of scuba divers' specialization on their underwater behavior”, Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 388-397.

Ong, T.F. and Musa, G. (2012), “Examining the influences of experience, personality and attitudes on SCUBA divers' underwater behaviour: a structural equation model”, Tourism Management, Vol. 33 No. 6, pp. 1521-1534.

Plummer, R. and Fennell, D. (2009), “Managing protected areas for sustainable tourism: prospects for adaptive co-management”, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 149-168.

R Core Team (2019), R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, available at: https://www.R-project.org/

Saayman, M. and Saayman, A. (2018), “Are there economic benefits from marine protected areas? An analysis of scuba diver expenditure”, European Journal of Tourism Research, Vol. 19, pp. 23-39.

Schuhmann, P.W., Casey, J.F., Horrocks, J.A. and Oxenford, H.A. (2013), “Recreational SCUBA divers' willingness to pay for marine biodiversity in Barbados”, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 121, pp. 29-36.

Schuhmann, P.W., Skeete, R., Waite, R., Lorde, T., Bangwayo-Skeete, P., Oxenford, H., Gill, D., Moore, W. and Spencer, F. (2019), “Visitors' willingness to pay marine conservation fees in Barbados”, Tourism Management, Vol. 71, pp. 315-326.

Shaalan, I.M. (2005), “Sustainable tourism development in the Red Sea of Egypt threats and opportunities”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 13, pp. 83-87.

Stake, R.E. (1995), The Art of Case Study Research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.

Stefănica, M., Sandu, C.B., Butnaru, G.I. and Haller, A.P. (2021), “The nexus between tourism activities and environmental degradation: Romania tourists’ opinions”, Sustainability, Vol. 13, p. 9210.

Suardana, I.W. (2016), “Motivation, satisfaction, trust and loyalty: an analysis of divers' behavior”, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 21-51.

Tao, C.H., Eagles, P.F. and Smith, S.L.J. (2004), “Profiling Taiwanese ecotourists using a self-definition approach”, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 149-168.

Townsend, C. (2008), “Interpretation and environmental education as conservation tools”, in Garrod, B. and Gössling, S. (Eds), New Frontiers in Marine Tourism: Diving Experiences, Sustainability, Management, Elsevier, Oxford, pp.189-200.

Trujillo, J.C., Carillo, B., Charris, C.A. and Velilla, R.A. (2016), “Coral reefs under threat in Caribbean marine protected area: assessing divers' willingness to pay toward conservation”, Marine Policy, Vol. 68, pp. 146-154.

Wondirad, A., Tolkach, D. and King, B. (2020), “Stakeholder collaboration as a major factor for sustainable ecotourism development in developing countries”, Tourism Management, Vol. 78, p. 104024.

Wong, L.M., Thirumoorthy, T. and Musa, G. (2013), “Scuba diving motivation”, in Musa, G. and Dimmock, K. (Eds), Scuba Diving Tourism: Contemporary Geographies of Leisure, Tourism and Mobility, Routledge, New York, pp. 107-116.

Wongthong, P. and Harvey, N. (2014), “Integrated coastal management and sustainable tourism: a case study of the reef-based SCUBA dive industry from Thailand”, Ocean and Coastal Management, Vol. 95, pp. 138-146.

World Wild Fund (WWF) Mediterranean, COGITO project (2020), “Enhance integrated and sustainable management of coastal, insular and marine protected areas in the Mediterranean - 2018-2021”, Annual Project Report.

Xiao, H. and Smith, S.L.J. (2006), “Case studies in tourism research: a state-of-the-art analysis”, Tourism Management, Vol. 27, pp. 738-749.

Yin, R. (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks.

Yu, B., Cai, Y., Jin, L. and Du, B. (2018), “Effects on willingness to pay for marine conservation: evidence from Zhejiang Province, China”, Sustainability, Vol. 10 No. 7, p. 2298.

Zolfani, S.H., Sedaghar, M., Maknoon, R. and Zavadskas, E.K. (2015), “Sustainable tourism: a comprehensive literature review on frameworks and applications”, Economic Research, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 1-30.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Marina Gomei, Giuseppe di Carlo and Mauro Randone of the WWF Mediterranean Marine Initiative for their insight, advice and support; J. Jrijer, S. Mahjoub, M. Abaab of WWF North Africa; B. Souici from Tabarka, A. Abidiand from the Taza and Gouraya National Parks for participating in field studies; and Kate Hogg, a Marine Conservation Consultant, for her advice.

Corresponding author

Iacopo Cavallini can be contacted at: iacopo.cavallini@unipi.it

Related articles