To read this content please select one of the options below:

The risk of embarrassment in buying luxury counterfeits: do face-conscious consumers care?

Ling Jiang (Department of Marketing, School of Management, University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, Canada)
Annie Peng Cui (Department of Marketing, John Chambers College of Business and Economics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA)
Juan Shan (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China)

European Journal of Marketing

ISSN: 0309-0566

Article publication date: 2 May 2023

Issue publication date: 27 June 2023

948

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to examine the role of face consciousness, materialism and risk of embarrassment in determining consumer purchase intention toward counterfeit luxury brand. In addition, the authors explore boundary conditions of these relationships.

Design/methodology/approach

Study 1, a survey research (N = 321), examines the mediating role of risk of embarrassment between face consciousness on the purchase intention toward luxury counterfeits. Study 2 (N = 345), an experimental study, examines the moderating role of brand prominence of counterfeit (i.e. whether it contains prominent brand signals). Study 3 (N = 315) explores how the above-mentioned relationships are moderated by consumers’ moral rationalization (i.e. whether consumers seek rationalization when behaving unethically).

Findings

First, this research shows that risk of embarrassment mediates the negative relationship between face consciousness and Chinese consumers’ purchase intention toward luxury counterfeits, whereas this relationship was not found between materialism and counterfeit purchase intentions. Second, this negative mediating effect holds only when the counterfeit brand is highly prominent. Third, the mediating effect depends on consumers’ moral rationalization, with a positive impact on the purchase intention toward luxury counterfeits, regardless of brand prominence.

Research limitations/implications

This study represents a preliminary inquiry into the dynamics between face consciousness and materialism in influencing Chinese consumers’ purchase intention toward counterfeit luxury products. Unlike their Western counterparts, whose materialistic views of possessions predict their counterfeit luxury consumption (Davidson et al., 2019), Chinese consumers are more likely to be driven by the social implications of counterfeit luxury to communicate a prestigious social image to others on account of genuine luxuries’ high social recognition.

Practical implications

While Chinese consumers are one of the most potent global luxury buyers, they are immersed in the world’s biggest counterfeit luxury market. By digging into the core value of Chinese consumers (i.e. face consciousness), this research provides a number of managerial implications for luxury goods companies to engage in international efforts to educate consumers against counterfeit luxury.

Originality/value

This study makes at least three contributions to the counterfeit consumption literature. First, this study represents a preliminary inquiry into the dynamics between face consciousness and materialism in influencing Chinese consumers’ purchase intention toward counterfeit luxury products. Second, this research identified the complex mechanism of face consciousness as an independent variable on consumers’ purchase intention toward luxury counterfeits. Finally, the authors examined the boundary conditions of brand prominence and consumers’ moral rationalization. The findings may help luxury brand managers identify strategies to discourage counterfeit consumption.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 22BGL125) and Fonds de Recherche du Quebec : Society and Culture (No. 2021-NP-281517).

All authors contributed equally to this work.

Citation

Jiang, L., Cui, A.P. and Shan, J. (2023), "The risk of embarrassment in buying luxury counterfeits: do face-conscious consumers care?", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57 No. 8, pp. 1996-2020. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-11-2021-0891

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles