To read this content please select one of the options below:

Innocent until proven guilty: suspicion of deception in online reviews

Maria Petrescu (Worldwide College of Business, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Worldwide and Online, Daytona Beach, Florida, USA)
Philip Kitchen (Department of Marketing, ICN Business School ARTEM, Nancy, France)
Costinel Dobre (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, West University of Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania)
Selima Ben Mrad (Huizenga College of Business and Entrepreneurship, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA)
Anca Milovan-Ciuta (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, West University of Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania)
Deborah Goldring (Department of Marketing, Stetson University, DeLand, Florida, USA)
Anne Fiedler (Huizenga College of Business and Entrepreneurship, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA)

European Journal of Marketing

ISSN: 0309-0566

Article publication date: 15 April 2022

Issue publication date: 26 April 2022

976

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to formulate a new framework for identifying deception in consumer reviews through the lens of interpersonal deception theory (IDT) and the persuasion knowledge model (PKM). It evaluates variables contributing to consumer intentions to purchase after reading deceptive reviews and proposes deception identification cues to be incorporated into the interpersonal communication theoretical framework.

Design/methodology/approach

The first study is qualitative and quantitative, based on sentiment and lexical analysis of 1,000 consumer reviews. The second study uses the US national consumer survey with a partial least squares partial least squares-structural equation modeling and a process-based mediation–moderation analysis.

Findings

This study shows deceptive characteristics that cannot be dissimulated by reviewing consumers that represent review legitimacy based on review valence, authenticity, formalism and analytical writing. The results also support the central role of consumer suspicion of an ulterior motive, with a direct and mediation effect regarding consumer emotions and intentions, including brand trust and purchase intentions.

Research limitations/implications

This paper presents a new framework for identifying deception in consumer reviews based on IDT and PKM, adding new theoretical elements that help adapt these theories to written digital communication specificities. This study clarifies the role of suspicion in a deceptive communication context and shows the variables contributing to consumers’ purchase intention after reading deceptive reviews. The results also emphasize the benefits of lexical analysis in identifying deceptive characteristics of reviews.

Practical implications

Companies can consider the vulnerability of certain generations based on lower levels of suspicions and different linguistic cues to detect deception in reviews. Long-term, marketers can also implement deception identification practices as potential new business models and opportunities.

Social implications

Policymakers and regulators need to consider critical deception cues and the differences in suspicion levels among segments of consumers in the formulation of preventative and deception management measures.

Originality/value

This study contributes to the literature by formulating a new framework for identifying deception in consumer reviews, adapted to the characteristics of written digital communication. This study emphasizes deception cues in electronic word-of-mouth and provides additional opportunities for theorizing deception in electronic communication.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the editor, associate editor, and anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive feedback throughout the journey of this manuscript.

Citation

Petrescu, M., Kitchen, P., Dobre, C., Ben Mrad, S., Milovan-Ciuta, A., Goldring, D. and Fiedler, A. (2022), "Innocent until proven guilty: suspicion of deception in online reviews", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56 No. 4, pp. 1184-1209. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2019-0776

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles