To read this content please select one of the options below:

How the egocentric alliance network impacts firm ambidextrous innovation: a three-way interaction model

Guiyang Zhang (School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China)
Chaoying Tang (School Economics and Management, University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China)

European Journal of Innovation Management

ISSN: 1460-1060

Article publication date: 21 October 2020

Issue publication date: 3 January 2022

790

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the paper is to advance a framework that can analyze the impact of the egocentric alliance network on firm ambidextrous innovation holistically. On this purpose, the framework involves and integrates structural holes (SH), alliance functional diversity (AFD) and alliance partner geographical diversity (APGD) that measure network characteristics from structural, relational and nodal perspectives, respectively.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors collected multi-source matching panel data including alliance deals, technical patents and financial information during 2000–2017 of the 106 top high-tech firms in the computer, communications, electronics and biopharmaceutical industries and conducted a three-way interaction model to uncover the complex mechanisms from a contingency perspective.

Findings

Empirical results show that SH as structural capital is positive to both exploitative and exploratory innovation. Both AFD as relational capital and APGD as cognitive capital positively moderate the SH-exploitative innovation nexus rather than the SH-exploratory innovation nexus. APGD and AFD co-moderate the relationship between SH and firm ambidextrous innovation in the way that when APGD and AFD are both high, SH has the strongest positive impacts on firm exploitative and exploratory innovation.

Originality/value

This research provides new insights into the benefit-cost paradox of the structural brokerage position (SH) by uncovering relational (AFD) and nodal (APGD) network characteristics that impact the trade-off. Also, it contributes to social capital theory by differentiating three dimensions of network capital (structural, relational and cognitive capital) and integrating them into ambidextrous innovation research. Finally, the findings give firms enlightenment to configure their egocentric alliance network for innovation ambidexterity.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Funding: Social Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, 20GLC012. National Natural Science Foundation of China, 71673264, 71932009, 71974178, 71673135, 71974096.

Citation

Zhang, G. and Tang, C. (2022), "How the egocentric alliance network impacts firm ambidextrous innovation: a three-way interaction model", European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 19-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2020-0295

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles