To read this content please select one of the options below:

Organisational culture of Chinese construction organisations in Kuwait

Martin Jaeger (Department of Civil Engineering, Australian College of Kuwait, Kuwait City, Kuwait)
Gang Yu (School of Business, Australian College of Kuwait, Kuwait City, Kuwait)
Desmond Adair (School of Engineering & ICT, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia)

Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

ISSN: 0969-9988

Article publication date: 20 November 2017

857

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to identify evidence for, first, the existence and nature of organisational culture of Chinese construction organisations in Kuwait, second, the differences and similarities when comparing with construction organisations in China and, third, the differences and similarities when comparing with construction organisations within the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC).

Design/methodology/approach

Data were collected through researcher administered survey instruments from 33 Chinese construction project managers in Kuwait, then were analysed by using the Organisational Culture Assessment Instrument and empirical statistics.

Findings

The Hierarchy culture was found to be dominant. It matches the predominant organisational culture among construction organisations in China, but is different from the blend of Hierarchy and Group culture of construction organisations in the GCC.

Originality/value

Chinese construction organisations in Kuwait were found to foster an organisational culture that is close to Chinese construction organisations in China regarding Hierarchy, Market and Adhocracy culture, but closer to the GCC construction organisations regarding the Group culture. Practitioners need to be aware of the differences and similarities identified in order to manage cultural diversity effectively.

Keywords

Citation

Jaeger, M., Yu, G. and Adair, D. (2017), "Organisational culture of Chinese construction organisations in Kuwait", Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 24 No. 6, pp. 1051-1066. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2016-0157

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles