Optimization of concrete placing operation based on competing carbon footprint, cost and production rate objectives

Abstract

Purpose

Due to considerable contributions of the construction industry to the global carbon emissions, a great deal of attention is placed on possible incorporation of carbon footprint minimization as an important objective in the planning of construction operations. The purpose of this paper is to present a framework to estimate and minimize the carbon emissions of the concrete placing operation through identifying the optimal number of pumps and the inter-arrival time of truck mixers.

Design/methodology/approach

The proposed framework integrates discrete event simulation and multi-objective optimization to estimate and minimize the carbon emission, costs and production rate of the concrete placing operation. An actual construction project is used to demonstrate the application of the proposed framework. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis is performed to investigate the sensitivity of the results to variations in modeling parameters including the ratio of idle to non-idle emission rates of equipment and the activity duration distributions.

Findings

The results of the case study highlight that variations in the number of pumps and inter-arrival time of truck mixers significantly affect the carbon emissions, cost and production rate of the concrete placing operation. Furthermore, the results of the sensitivity analysis show that variations in the ratio of idle to non-idle emission rates for pumps and truck mixers have little effects on the selected setting for the project. This is contrary to the effect of uncertainty in the activity duration distributions, which was found to be significant.

Originality/value

Results of this study provide an insight into the trade-off between carbon emissions, cost and production rate of the concrete placing operation.

Citation

Moussavi Nadoushani, Z.S., Akbarnezhad, A. and Rey, D. (2018), "Optimization of concrete placing operation based on competing carbon footprint, cost and production rate objectives", Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 25 No. 7, pp. 938-957. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2017-0080