To read this content please select one of the options below:

Epistemological freedom: activating co-learning and co-production to decolonise knowledge production

Maheen Khan (Maastricht Sustainability Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands)
Hanna A. Ruszczyk (Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, UK)
Mohammad Feisal Rahman (Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, UK)
Saleemul Huq (International Centre for Climate Change and Development, Dhaka, Bangladesh)

Disaster Prevention and Management

ISSN: 0965-3562

Article publication date: 14 December 2021

Issue publication date: 2 June 2022

410

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the paper is to challenge and address the limitations of the traditional system of knowledge production that is embedded in disaster and climate change research studies, and research studies in general. It argues that knowledge production in research processes conforms to colonialist thinking or west-inspired approaches. Such a system often results in the omission of crucial information due to a lack of participation, inclusion and diversity in knowledge production.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper proposes practices and recommendations to decolonise knowledge production in disaster and climate change research studies, and research studies in general. It provides a brief literature review on the concepts of decolonisation of knowledge and epistemological freedom, and its origins; assesses the need for knowledge decolonisation, emphasising on the integration of local knowledge from grassroots women-led initiatives in instances where disasters and crises are being investigated in vulnerable communities, especially in the Global South; and finally the paper proposes to decolonise knowledge production through activating co-learning and co-production. The practices have been developed from the work of relevant authors in the field and case studies.

Findings

Through a brief literature review on previous discourses on the topic of knowledge decolonisation and analysis of recent case studies on disaster and crisis management and community resilience, the paper finds that there exists a lack of pluralism and inclusion in epistemology which limits the pursuit to obtain the whole truth in the production of knowledge in research studies.

Originality/value

This paper adds to the discussion of decolonisation of knowledge in the field of disaster and climate change research studies, and research processes in general. It provides in-depth analyses of recent case studies of emerging community resilience and local practices that were crucial in the face of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Hanna Ruszczyk would like to acknowledge the support received from the “Gender Responsive Resilience and Intersectionality in Policy and Practice (GRRIPP) - Networking Plus Partnering for Resilience”. Ruszczyk utilised some of her GRRIPP allocated time to co-develop and co-write this paper during 2020–2021. The UKRI Collective Fund award “Gender Responsive Resilience and Intersectionality in Policy and Practice (GRRIPP) - Networking Plus Partnering for Resilience” is funded by the Global Challenges Research Fund.

Citation

Khan, M., Ruszczyk, H.A., Rahman, M.F. and Huq, S. (2022), "Epistemological freedom: activating co-learning and co-production to decolonise knowledge production", Disaster Prevention and Management, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 182-192. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-03-2021-0070

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles