To read this content please select one of the options below:

Comparing life cycle cost and environmental impact optimizations of a low voltage dry type distribution transformer

Benoit Delinchant (The Grenoble Electrical Engineering Laboratory (G2Elab), Grenoble University, Grenoble, France)
Guillaume Mandil (G-SCOP, Grenoble University, Grenoble, France)
Frédéric Wurtz (The Grenoble Electrical Engineering Laboratory (G2Elab), University of Grenoble, Grenoble, France)

Abstract

Purpose

Life cycle analysis (LCA) is more and more used in the context of electromagnetic product design. But it is often used to check a design solution regarding environmental impacts after technical and economical choices. This paper aims to investigate life cycle impact optimization (LCIO) and compare it with the classical life cycle cost optimization (LCCO).

Design/methodology/approach

First, a model of a dry-type transformer using different materials for windings and the magnetic core is presented. LCCO, which is a mixed continuous-discrete, multi-objective technico-economic optimization, is done using both deterministic and genetic algorithms. LCCO results and optimization performances are analyzed, and an LCA is presented for a set of optimal solutions. The final part is dedicated to LCIO, where the paper shows that these optimal solutions are close to those obtained with LCCO.

Findings

This paper investigated LCIO using an environmental impacts model that has been introduced in the optimization framework Component Architecture for the Design of Engineering Systems. The paper shows how a mixed continuous-discrete, multi-objective technico-economic optimization can be done using an efficient deterministic optimization algorithm such as Sequential Quadratic Programming. Thanks to the technico-economic-environmental model and the efficient optimization algorithm, both LCCO and LCIO were performed separately and together. It has been shown that optimal solutions are similar, leading to the conclusion that only one modeling is required (economic or environmental) but on the life cycle.

Originality/value

The classical sequential methodology of design is improved here by the use of a model of calculation of the environmental impacts allowing the optimization. This original optimization allowed the authors to show that an analysis of the life cycle from an economic point of view or from an environmental point of view led to quasi-equivalent technical solutions. The key is to take into account the life cycle of the product.

Keywords

Citation

Delinchant, B., Mandil, G. and Wurtz, F. (2018), "Comparing life cycle cost and environmental impact optimizations of a low voltage dry type distribution transformer", COMPEL - The international journal for computation and mathematics in electrical and electronic engineering, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 645-660. https://doi.org/10.1108/COMPEL-12-2016-0533

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles