To read this content please select one of the options below:

The Eastern construction of paradoxical cognitive framework and its antecedents: a Yin–Yang balancing perspective

Yong Yang (School of Management, Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, China)
Youqing Fan (School of Business, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia)
Jianfeng Jia (School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China)

Chinese Management Studies

ISSN: 1750-614X

Article publication date: 29 August 2021

Issue publication date: 25 November 2022

542

Abstract

Purpose

In the face of external paradoxical requirements, the cognitive framework of managers and employees use to perceive, interpret and reconstruct information is important to ease anxiety and improve job performance. The Yin-Yang balancing of eastern philosophical thought is particularly good at explaining and predicting changes and conflict environments. For this reason, this study aims to propose the eastern construction of the paradoxical cognitive framework based on the Yin-Yang balancing theory and its antecedent framework.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper contrasts the similarity and differences between Chinese and Western philosophy’s thoughts on paradoxes. On this basis, the eastern construction of the paradoxical cognitive framework is proposed. Then, the paper puts forward the antecedent framework of managers’ cognitive framework and employees’ paradoxical cognitive framework.

Findings

This paper proposes the eastern construction of the paradoxical cognitive framework includes the following three dimensions: the unity-in-diversity of paradoxical elements, the asymmetric balance of paradoxical elements and mutual transformation of paradoxical elements. In addition, this paper proposes an antecedent framework of the eastern construction of the paradoxical cognitive framework – the paradoxical requirement of organizational environment exerts a direct impact on managers’ and employees’ paradoxical cognitive framework; managers’ paradoxical cognitive framework has a positive impact on paradoxical leadership; paradoxical leadership exerts an indirect impact on employees’ paradoxical cognitive framework through the collective paradoxical cognitive framework; paradoxical leadership directly affects employees’ paradoxical cognitive framework.

Research limitations/implications

This paper focuses on comparing the similarities and differences of the individual paradoxical cognitive framework in Chinese and Western cultures and proposes the eastern construction of the paradoxical cognitive framework and its antecedent framework. Future research needs to further verify the theoretical framework proposed in this paper.

Originality/value

This paper makes a detailed comparison of the paradox views in Chinese and Western philosophy. It is the first to propose the eastern construction of the paradoxical cognitive framework and its antecedent framework, laying a theoretical foundation for future empirical research.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Funding: This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Project No. 71972033, 71672031, 71972032; Young Foundation of Ministry of Education in China, No: 19YJC630227; LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program, Project No. XLYC1807218; the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China, Project No. N2006005; N2023037.

Yong Yang and Youqing Fan contribute equally to the paper;

Conflicts of interest: All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Citation

Yang, Y., Fan, Y. and Jia, J. (2022), "The Eastern construction of paradoxical cognitive framework and its antecedents: a Yin–Yang balancing perspective", Chinese Management Studies, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 1081-1107. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-12-2020-0577

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles