To read this content please select one of the options below:

Critical success criteria for retirement village public – private partnership housing

Robert Osei-Kyei (School of Engineering Design and Built Environment, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia)
Timur Narbaev (Business School, Kazakh-British Technical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan)
Michael Atafo-Adabre (Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, China)
Nicholas Chileshe (UniSA STEM, Sustainable Infrastructure and Resource Management (SIRM), University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia and Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa)
Joseph Kwame Ofori-Kuragu (Faculty of Science and Engineering, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK)

Construction Innovation

ISSN: 1471-4175

Article publication date: 28 June 2022

Issue publication date: 27 November 2023

309

Abstract

Purpose

The demand for retirement villages globally has been increasing due to the rapid growth in the ageing population in recent years. To address the rising challenges in the retirement market, the public–private partnership (PPP) has become a feasible method to develop retirement villages. This paper aims to survey and examine the key success criteria (SC) for using the PPP approach in the retirement village sector.

Design/methodology/approach

An empirical questionnaire survey was conducted with experts experienced in international PPP and retirement village. The analysis was conducted using one-way analysis of variance, mean score analysis, Kendall’s coefficient of concordance and factor analysis.

Findings

Results indicate that out of the 16 recognized SC, the most significant ones are SC1: “Affordability”, SC11: “Reduced social isolation of residents” and SC14: “Improvement of emotional wellbeing of residents”. Furthermore, results from the factor analysis technique indicate that the 16 SC can be classified into five major factor groupings, and these include SCG1 – “Financial performance of project”; SCG2 – “Adherence to design and technical specifications”; SCG3 – “Adherence to local council/authority’s environmental health and socio-economic requirements”; SCG4 – “Social inclusion and risk management”; and SCG5 – “Advancement in emotional wellbeing and physical health of residents”.

Originality/value

The study will sufficiently assist retirement village stakeholders, retirement village project participants and related government authorities of the best measures to put in place to maintain the sustainable development of the global retirement village market.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This paper is part of a broad study entitled “Delivering affordable retirement village projects through PPP”, from which other papers have been produced with different objectives/scope but sharing similar background and methodology. The project described was funded by the Western Sydney University Early Career Research Fellowship Grant/Award.

Citation

Osei-Kyei, R., Narbaev, T., Atafo-Adabre, M., Chileshe, N. and Ofori-Kuragu, J.K. (2023), "Critical success criteria for retirement village public – private partnership housing", Construction Innovation, Vol. 23 No. 5, pp. 1018-1037. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-11-2021-0206

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles