To read this content please select one of the options below:

Testing asymmetric correlations in stock returns via empirical likelihood method

Zhiyuan Pan (Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China)
Xu Zheng (Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China)
Qiang Chen (Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China)

China Finance Review International

ISSN: 2044-1398

Article publication date: 11 February 2014

603

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to propose a model-free statistic that tests asymmetric correlations of stock returns, in which stocks move more often with the market when the market goes down than when it goes up, and then empirically analyze the asymmetric correlations of the China stock market and international stock markets, respectively.

Design/methodology/approach

Using empirical likelihood method, this study designs and conducts a model-free test, which converges to χ2 distribution under regulated conditions and performs well in the finite sample using bootstrap critical value method.

Findings

By analyzing the authors' model-free test, the authors find that compared with Hong et al.'s test that closely relates to the authors, both of the tests are under rejected using asymptotic critical value. However, using the bootstrap critical value method can greatly improve the performance of the two tests. Second, investigating the power of the two tests, the authors find that the proportion of rejections of the authors' test is roughly 10-20 percent larger than Hong et al.'s test in mixed copula model setting. The last finding is the authors find evidence of asymmetric for small-cap size portfolios, but no evidence for middle-cap and large-cap size portfolios in the China stock market. Besides, the authors test asymmetric correlations between the USA and Japan, France and the UK; the asymmetric phenomenon exists in international stock markets, which is similar to Longin and Solnik's findings, but they are not significant according to both the authors' test and Hong et al.'s test.

Research limitations/implications

The findings in this study suggest that both the authors' test and Hong et al.'s test are under rejected using asymptotic critical value. When applying these statistics to test asymmetric correlations, the authors should take care with the choice of critical value.

Practical implications

The empirical analysis has a significant practical implication for asset allocation, asset pricing and risk management fields.

Originality/value

This study constructs a model-free statistic to test asymmetric correlations using empirical likelihood method for the first time and corrects the size performance by bootstrap method, which improves the performance of Hong et al.'s test. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to test the asymmetric correlations in the China stock market.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

JEL classification – C12, G19. The authors are grateful to two anonymous referees for helpful comments that have improved this paper. This work was supported by the Chinese National Science Foundation through Grant No. 70971087.

Citation

Pan, Z., Zheng, X. and Chen, Q. (2014), "Testing asymmetric correlations in stock returns via empirical likelihood method", China Finance Review International, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 42-57. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-08-2012-0091

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2014, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles