To read this content please select one of the options below:

Looking into the future: Hofstede long term orientation versus GLOBE future orientation

Sunil Venaik (UQ Business School, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia)
Yunxia Zhu (UQ Business School, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia)
Paul Brewer (UQ Business School, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia)

Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal

ISSN: 1352-7606

Article publication date: 25 July 2013

14402

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to critically examine, theoretically and empirically, the two time orientation dimensions – long‐term orientation (LTO) and future orientation (FO) – in the national culture models of Hofstede and GLOBE, respectively.

Design/methodology/approach

Following Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck's past‐present‐future theoretical lens, the Hofstede LTO and GLOBE FO measures are analysed to understand the conceptual domain covered by these two dimensions. Next, the authors empirically examine the relationship of Hofstede LTO and GLOBE FO with secondary data from Hofstede, GLOBE, and the World Values Survey.

Findings

This paper shows that Hofstede LTO and GLOBE FO dimensions capture different aspects of time orientation of societies. In particular, Hofstede LTO focuses on past (tradition) versus future (thrift) aspect of societies, GLOBE FO practices capture the present versus future (planning) practices of societies, and GLOBE FO values reflect societal aspirations and preferences for planning.

Research limitations/implications

A specific implication of these findings is that the three dimensions of time orientation are not interchangeable since they represent different characteristics of societies. A wider implication for researchers is to ensure high level of precision in and congruence among construct labels, definitions and measures to avoid confusion and misapplication of cross‐cultural concepts.

Practical implications

In an increasingly globalized world, a clear understanding of societal time orientation will help managers deal more effectively with their counterparts in other countries.

Originality/value

The key contribution of this paper is in identifying and clarifying, both theoretically and empirically, the anomalies in the labels, definitions and measurement of Hofstede long‐term orientation and GLOBE future orientation national culture dimensions. It also shows a useful way forward for researchers on how to use these national culture dimensions to explain other phenomena of interest to cross‐cultural scholars.

Keywords

Citation

Venaik, S., Zhu, Y. and Brewer, P. (2013), "Looking into the future: Hofstede long term orientation versus GLOBE future orientation", Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 361-385. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCM-02-2012-0014

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2013, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles