To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:

The e-Duke Scholarly Collection: e-book v. print use

Cathy Goodwin (Kimbel Library, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, South Carolina, USA)

Collection Building

ISSN: 0160-4953

Article publication date: 30 September 2014

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to compare print and e-book use for identical titles in the e-Duke Scholarly Collection (e-DSC) from 2011 to 2013 to determine format preference for a discrete collection of titles in humanities and social sciences.

Design/methodology/approach

Use statistics for the e-DSC were downloaded from the e-book platform by title and call number to determine use by title and subject. Circulation statistics were culled from the library’s integrated library system for the same titles to compare e-book use to that of the same print title.

Findings

Although e-books had a high number of titles with use as a per cent of the collection, examination of substantive use shows a slight preference for print. While 73 per cent of the e-books garnered enough interest to click on them, only 12 per cent had substantive use.

Research limitations/implications

The e-DSC changed platforms in December 2013. The new platform does not require users to create an account to download e-book sections and digital rights management limitations have been removed. The same examination of collection use in 2.5 years on the new platform will provide an interesting comparison on the function of platform on e-book use.

Originality/value

The comparison of identical print and e-titles is less studied and includes the examination of “substantive use” in comparing print to e-book use.

Keywords

Citation

Goodwin, C. (2014), "The e-Duke Scholarly Collection: e-book v. print use", Collection Building, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 101-105. https://doi.org/10.1108/CB-05-2014-0024

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2014, Emerald Group Publishing Limited