To read this content please select one of the options below:

Greening Chinese agriculture: can China use the EU experience?

Huanguang Qiu (School of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China)
C.F.A. van Wesenbeeck (Amsterdam Centre for World Food Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
W.C.M. van Veen (Amsterdam Centre for World Food Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

China Agricultural Economic Review

ISSN: 1756-137X

Article publication date: 21 September 2020

Issue publication date: 12 January 2021

537

Abstract

Purpose

China's Government in 2015 announced its goal of stabilizing the use of fertilizers and pesticide by the year 2020. However, implementation of effective policies is not straightforward, while one may even argue that the policy goal is by far not ambitious enough. Hence, it is useful to look at experiences of other countries that have gone through a similar process. In this paper, the authors explicitly consider the case of European Union's (EU’s) policies aimed at greening agriculture. The choice for the EU is motivated by the fact that the EU is about 35 years ahead of China in implementing a policy agenda to counter the problems China is facing now.

Design/methodology/approach

In this paper, the authors focus on agricultural inputs, in particular fertilizer and pesticides, as well as land use and their impact on food safety, air and water quality, soil degradation, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and biodiversity. Policies related to those issues are discussed for both, China and the EU. Given that implementation and monitoring are critical for the success of policies, the authors also discuss how policies are implemented and monitored under different governance and institutional conditions.

Findings

From the EU experiences, positive and negative, three central lessons are drawn: (1) China should strive for cross compliance but in two steps. In the first step, arrangements for on-farm monitoring must be made, coupled with a pilot program of cross-compliance conditions for large farms in selected counties; in the second step, cross-compliance requirements must be introduced for all farmers, with additional funds for rural development in vulnerable areas. (2) Strong stakeholder commitment should be sought in the formulation as well as implementation of greening policies. (3) Monitoring of greening results should be harmonized and standardized across the country, with a limited number of indicators.

Originality/value

This paper contributes to the policy discussion by comparing the agricultural greening measures in the EU (which was some 35 years ago in the same situation as China now) with the measures taken in China so far.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the two anonymous referees for their very useful comments on the earlier verions of the paper, and Michiel Keyzer, the former Director of the Centre for World Food Studies of the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, for putting the subject on the Centre’s research agenda. Furthermore, Huanguang Qiu acknowledges the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant nos. 51711520318, 71673290, 71861147002 and 71933004.

Citation

Qiu, H., van Wesenbeeck, C.F.A. and van Veen, W.C.M. (2021), "Greening Chinese agriculture: can China use the EU experience?", China Agricultural Economic Review, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 96-123. https://doi.org/10.1108/CAER-10-2019-0186

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles