To read this content please select one of the options below:

How to make it stick? Institutionalising process improvement initiatives

Ahangama Withanage Janitha Chandimali Abeygunasekera (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Finance, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka)
Wasana Bandara (School of Information Systems, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia)
Moe Thandar Wynn (School of Information Systems, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia)
Ogan Yigitbasioglu (School of Accountancy, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia)

Business Process Management Journal

ISSN: 1463-7154

Article publication date: 16 May 2022

Issue publication date: 20 May 2022

354

Abstract

Purpose

Understanding how organisations can institutionalise the outcomes of process improvement initiatives is limited. This paper explores how process changes resulting from improvement initiatives are adhered to, so that the changed processes become the new “norm” and people do not revert to old practices. This study proposes an institutionalisation process for process improvement initiatives.

Design/methodology/approach

Firstly, a literature review identified Tolbert and Zucker’s (1996) institutionalisation framework as a suitable conceptual framework on which to base the enquiry. The second phase (the focus of this paper) applied the findings from two case studies to adapt this framework (its stages and related factors) to fit process improvement contexts.

Findings

The paper presents an empirically and theoretically supported novel institutionalisation process for process improvement initiatives. The three stages of the institutionalisation process presented by Tolbert and Zucker (1996) have been respecified into four stages, explaining how process changes are institutionalised through “Planning”, “Implementation”, “Objectification” and “Sedimentation” (the original first stage, i.e. “Habitualisation” being divided into Planning and Implementation). Some newly identified Business Process Management (BPM) specific factors influencing the institutionalisation processes are also discussed and triangulated with the BPM literature.

Research limitations/implications

The study contributes to the BPM literature by conceptualising and theorising the stages of institutionalisation of process improvement initiatives. In doing so, the study explicitly identifies and considers several key contextual factors that drive the stages of institutionalisation. Practitioners can use this to better manage process change and future researchers can use this framework to operationalise institutionalisation of process change.

Originality/value

This is the first research study that provides an empirically supported and clearly conceptualised understanding of the stages of institutionalising process improvement outcomes.

Keywords

Citation

Abeygunasekera, A.W.J.C., Bandara, W., Wynn, M.T. and Yigitbasioglu, O. (2022), "How to make it stick? Institutionalising process improvement initiatives", Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 807-833. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-03-2021-0170

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles