To read this content please select one of the options below:

Benchmarking operating room departments in the Netherlands: Evaluation of a benchmarking collaborative between eight university medical centres

Elizabeth van Veen-Berkx (Department of Operating Rooms, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands)
Dirk F. de Korne (Singapore National Eye Centre, SingHealth, Singapore, Singapore AND Institute for Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands)
Olivier S. Olivier (Medworq - Connecting Excellence, Doesburg, The Netherlands)
Roland A. Bal (Institute for Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands)
Geert Kazemier (Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Benchmarking: An International Journal

ISSN: 1463-5771

Article publication date: 4 July 2016

1687

Abstract

Purpose

Benchmarking is increasingly considered a useful management instrument to improve performance in healthcare. The purpose of this paper is to assess if a nationwide long-term benchmarking collaborative between operating room (OR) departments of university medical centres in the Netherlands leads to benefits in OR management and to evaluate if the initiative meets the requirements of the 4P-model.

Design/methodology/approach

The evaluation was based on the 4P-model (purposes, performance indicators, participating organisations, performance management system), developed in former studies. A mixed-methods design was applied, consisting of document study, observations, interviews as well as analysing OR performance data using SPSS statistics.

Findings

Collaborative benchmarking has benefits different from mainly performance improvement and identification of performance gaps. It is interesting that, since 2004, the OR benchmarking initiative still endures after already existing for ten years. A key benefit was pointed out by all respondents as “the purpose of networking”, on top of the purposes recognised in the 4P-model. The networking events were found to make it easier for participants to contact and also visit one another. Apparently, such informal contacts were helpful in spreading knowledge, sharing policy documents and initiating improvement. This benchmark largely met all key conditions of the 4P-model.

Research limitations/implications

The current study has the limitations accompanied with any qualitative research and particularly related to interviewing. Qualitative research findings must be viewed within the context of the conducted case study. The experiences in this university hospital context in the Netherlands might not be transferable to other (general) hospital settings or other countries. The number of conducted interviews is restricted; nevertheless, all other data sources are extensive.

Originality/value

A collaborative approach in benchmarking can be effective because participants use its knowledge-sharing infrastructure which enables operational, tactical and strategic learning. Organisational learning is to the advantage of overall OR management. Benchmarking seems a useful instrument in enabling hospitals to learn from each other, to initiate performance improvements and catalyse knowledge-sharing.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank all members of the steering and project committee of the Dutch Operating Room Benchmarking Collaborative for their participation and contribution. Current Members of the Dutch Operating Room Benchmarking Collaborative (the Netherlands): Academic Medical Center Amsterdam: Ron Balm, MD, PhD, Department of Vascular Surgery; Diederich C.C. Cornelisse, MSc, Department of Operating Rooms; Maastricht University Medical Center: Wolfgang F. Buhre, MD, PhD, Division of Anesthesiology; Hub J. Ackermans, Department of Operating Rooms; Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam: Robert Jan Stolker, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology and Division of Emergency, Perioperative and Intensive Care; Jeanne Bezstarosti, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Department of Operating Rooms; Leiden University Medical Center: Rob C.M. Pelger, MD, PhD, Department of Urology; Roald R. Schaad, MD, Department of Anesthesiology; University Medical Center Groningen: Irmgard Krooneman-Smits, MBA, Department of Operating Rooms; Peter Meyer, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology and Department of Operating Rooms; Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen: Hein G. Gooszen, MD, PhD, Department of Operating Rooms; Mirjam van Dijk-Jager, Department of Operating Rooms; Simon A.W. Broecheler, MSc, Department of Operating Rooms and Department of Anesthesiology; University Medical Center Utrecht: A. Christiaan Kroese, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Department of Operating Rooms; Jeffrey Kanters, Department of Operating Rooms; University of Twente: Johannes J. Krabbendam, PhD; Erwin W. Hans, PhD, Department of Operational Methods for Production and Logistics; VU University Medical Center: Marinus F. Caljouw, Division of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine; Derk P. Veerman, MD, PhD, Division of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine; Kjeld H. Aij, MBA, Division of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine.

Citation

van Veen-Berkx, E., de Korne, D.F., Olivier, O.S., Bal, R.A. and Kazemier, G. (2016), "Benchmarking operating room departments in the Netherlands: Evaluation of a benchmarking collaborative between eight university medical centres", Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 23 No. 5, pp. 1171-1192. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2014-0035

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles