To read this content please select one of the options below:

Sensory analysis and volatile compounds in Caiman latirostris meat in comparison with other traditional meats

Valeria Nepote (Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales (FCEFyN), Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal – Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (IMBIV-CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina)
Maria Carla Lábaque (Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas y Tecnológicas, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (IIByT-CONICET), Córdoba, Argentina) (Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología de los Alimentos (ICTA), Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina)
Patricia Raquel Quiroga (Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias (FCA), Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal – Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (IMBIV-CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina)
Pamela Maria de Lujan Leiva (CICyTTP-CONICETProv. Entre RíosUADER, Diamante, Argentina) (Proyecto Yacaré, Laboratorio de Zoología Aplicada: Anexo Vertebrados, FHUCUNL, Santa Fe, Argentina) (Facultad de Ciencia y TecnologíaUADER, Diamante, Argentina)
Arley Rey Paez (CICyTTP-CONICETProv. Entre RíosUADER, Diamante, Argentina) (Proyecto Yacaré, Laboratorio de Zoología Aplicada: Anexo Vertebrados, FHUCUNL, Santa Fe, Argentina)
Carlos Ignacion Piña (CICyTTP-CONICETProv. Entre RíosUADER, Diamante, Argentina) (Proyecto Yacaré, Laboratorio de Zoología Aplicada: Anexo Vertebrados, FHUCUNL, Santa Fe, Argentina) (Facultad de Ciencia y TecnologíaUADER, Diamante, Argentina)
Melina Soledad Simoncini (CICyTTP-CONICETProv. Entre RíosUADER, Diamante, Argentina) (Proyecto Yacaré, Laboratorio de Zoología Aplicada: Anexo Vertebrados, FHUCUNL, Santa Fe, Argentina) (Facultad de Ciencia y TecnologíaUADER, Diamante, Argentina)

British Food Journal

ISSN: 0007-070X

Article publication date: 13 October 2021

Issue publication date: 9 August 2022

143

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the paper is to compare consumer acceptance, sensory analysis and volatile compounds of caiman meat with regard to surubí fish and chicken meat.

Design/methodology/approach

Caiman tail, chicken thigh and surubí meats' cuts were cooked in a pan with little oil and salt. The affective tests of acceptance (9-points hedonic scale) and preference ranking were evaluated by 80 consumers. Sensory analysis carried out by eight trained panelists described attributes' intensities on an unstructured linear scale (0–150 mm). Volatile compounds were analysed by solid-phase micro-extraction and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry GC–MS.

Findings

Caiman meat had good acceptance values of 6–7 (“like slightly” to “like moderately”), being similarly preferred to surubí but less than chicken. The ratings of bitterness, hardness, fibrous appearance, fibrous texture and cohesiveness were higher and raw colour, characteristic flavour and oiliness were lower in caiman's meat than in the others. Caiman meat had lower juiciness than chicken but similar to surubí. Caiman showed lower levels of aldehydes than chicken, lower level of hydrocarbons and higher levels of acids and esters than the other meats. Alcohols, mainly found in caiman and chicken meat, were positively associated to aroma acceptance. Hydrocarbons, mainly found in surubí meat, were positively associated with the characteristic flavour and negatively correlated with aroma acceptance. Volatile composition of meats was related to their sensory attributes and consumer acceptance.

Originality/value

Given that caiman meat showed similar acceptance and preference to that of surubí, it could be considered a good quality meat, helping promote current programmes of sustainable use of natural resources.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors thank other members of Proyecto Yacaré and appreciate comments and suggestions on the manuscript by Dra. Ruth Elsey. This work was supported by the Proyecto Yacaré/Yacarés Santafesinos (Gob. Prov. de Santa Fe/MUPCN), and Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica PICT 2014 N 2212 (to M. Simoncini), PICT 2014 N 2138 (to C. Piña).

Citation

Nepote, V., Lábaque, M.C., Quiroga, P.R., de Lujan Leiva, P.M., Rey Paez, A., Piña, C.I. and Simoncini, M.S. (2022), "Sensory analysis and volatile compounds in Caiman latirostris meat in comparison with other traditional meats", British Food Journal, Vol. 124 No. 9, pp. 2673-2688. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-04-2021-0360

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles