To read this content please select one of the options below:

An appraisal of Australia's approach to promoting urban sustainability

Igor Martek (School of Architecture and the Built Environment, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia)
David J. Edwards (Department of the Built Environment, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK) (Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa)
Stewart Seaton (School of Architecture and the Built Environment, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia)
David Jones (School of Architecture and the Built Environment, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia)

Built Environment Project and Asset Management

ISSN: 2044-124X

Article publication date: 12 November 2021

Issue publication date: 8 February 2022

233

Abstract

Purpose

Much rhetoric exists on the urgency of transitioning from current practices to a more sustainable society. However, because this imperative is guided by strong ideological overtones, weaknesses and failures in the transition effort attract inadequate scrutiny. This paper reviews Australia's progress with sustainability in an urban domain and identifies key issues hindering the sustainability transition effort.

Design/methodology/approach

Research on urban sustainability is ubiquitous but this weight of publications tends to emphasize technical, operational or prescriptive themes. This research uses an interpretivist philosophical lens and inductive reasoning to manually analyse pertinent literature sourced from the Scopus and Web of Science data-bases. Specifically, this study assembles outcome and evaluative assessments pertaining to Australia's urban sustainability efforts to identify both the progress achieved and residual structural impediments.

Findings

Emergent findings illustrate that Australia's urban sustainability goals, as expressed by the Paris Accord, have not been met. Obstruction can be attributed to over-ambitious objectives combined with weak federal leadership, under-resourced local government, over-reliance on superficial rating systems and an ineffective regulatory regime. Elite “green branding” by image conscious corporations are insufficient to offset the general disinterest of the unincentivized majority of building owners and developers.

Originality/value

This paper cogently summarizes Australia's urban sustainability status, along with complexity of the challenges it faces to meet targets set.

Keywords

Citation

Martek, I., Edwards, D.J., Seaton, S. and Jones, D. (2022), "An appraisal of Australia's approach to promoting urban sustainability", Built Environment Project and Asset Management, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 262-276. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-07-2020-0130

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles