To read this content please select one of the options below:

Overview of the development and implementation of the mandatory building inspection scheme (MBIS) in Hong Kong

Daniel W.M. Chan (Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China)
Henry T.W. Hung (Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China)
Albert P.C. Chan (Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China)
Tony K.K. Lo (Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China)

Built Environment Project and Asset Management

ISSN: 2044-124X

Article publication date: 28 January 2014

815

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to provide a concise overview of the problem of building decay in Hong Kong, the current government measures concerning dilapidated buildings and the latest development and implementation of the mandatory building inspection scheme (MBIS). A comparison of various MBISs from other jurisdictions of the world is also given.

Design/methodology/approach

A desktop study of building inspection procedures, repair and maintenance policies was carried out, followed by an industry-wide opinion survey conducted by means of self-administered questionnaires. Target respondents are within the construction community of Hong Kong. The perceived benefits, potential difficulties and insightful recommendations or good practices are investigated. A comparison of the relative ranking of individual mean scores from various groups of respondents is presented in this paper.

Findings

The execution of MBIS was found to be effective in enhancing public awareness of the importance of building upkeep and recognition of the property owner's legal responsibilities in this respect. Private property owners were made aware of the necessity to take holistic preventive measures to maintain the overall safety of their own buildings. A comparison of MBIS with other similar MBISs across different cities, revealed similarities as regards the inspection cycle, scope of inspection and qualifications of inspectors. The main difference related to the age rather than the height of target buildings.

Practical implications

Proper inspection and maintenance is necessary to keep buildings in good condition to avoid injury or loss of life due to sudden collapse of structures or their elements such as concrete spalling and fall of window frames. The official launch of MBIS on 30 June 2012 is one of the proposed effective measures to resolve the long-standing problems of building neglect and deterioration in Hong Kong with particular regard to the existing old private premises.

Originality/value

The execution of MBIS should be useful in improving the safety and health status of the dilapidated premises and in so doing safeguarding the residents and general public. To further identify the perceived benefits and potential difficulties of MBIS, and to suggest insightful recommendations or good practices for its successful future implementation, an opinion survey was launched among construction practitioners in Hong Kong between March and April of 2012.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Department of Building and Real Estate of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University for providing financial support to this research study (HKPolyU BRE Departmental General Research Grants Allocation 2010-2011 with Project Account Code: G-YJ39). This paper forms part of a funded research project entitled “An exploratory study of the implementation of the Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme (MBIS) in Hong Kong” with several research objectives sharing common background of study and research methodology.

Citation

W.M. Chan, D., T.W. Hung, H., P.C. Chan, A. and K.K. Lo, T. (2014), "Overview of the development and implementation of the mandatory building inspection scheme (MBIS) in Hong Kong", Built Environment Project and Asset Management, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-07-2012-0040

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2014, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles