Emerald logo
Advanced search

Disclosure quality and earnings management: evidence from Jordan

Ebraheem Saleem Salem Alzoubi (Accounting Faculty, College of Business Administration, Abu Dhabi University, UAE and School of Accountancy, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Malaysia)

Accounting Research Journal

ISSN: 1030-9616

Publication date: 7 November 2016

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to extend previous research by empirically investigating the effect of the disclosure quality (DQ) on the magnitude of the earnings management (EM) among Jordanian companies listed in Amman Stock Exchange.

Design/methodology/approach

This study uses the cross-sectional version of the modified Jones model, where discretionary accruals are used for the EM proxy. Generalized least square regression is used to examine the influence of the DQ on EM for a sample of 86 industrial companies in the period of the years from 2007 to 2010.

Findings

The result produces evidence on the negative association between DQ and EM. The result also evidences the view that as the level of the disclosure is high, the magnitude of the EM reduces and, in turn, increases the financial reporting quality.

Originality/value

As there are relatively few researches conducted in this area specifically among Jordanian firms, the study broadens the scope by providing empirical evidence of the relationship between DQ and EM. This paper is the first empirical study to investigate the impact of the DQ on EM among Jordanian companies.

Keywords

  • Disclosure quality
  • Financial reporting quality
  • Earnings management

Acknowledgements

The author gratefully acknowledges the helpful comments and suggestions received from the two anonymous reviewers. M. Azizul Islam and Liz Marsland provided excellent editorial support. All the remaining errors are the sole responsibility of the author.

Citation

Alzoubi, E. (2016), "Disclosure quality and earnings management: evidence from Jordan", Accounting Research Journal, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 429-456. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-04-2014-0041

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
Login
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.
Rent from Deepdyve
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
Contact us
Emerald Publishing
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
© 2019 Emerald Publishing Limited

Services

  • Authors Opens in new window
  • Editors Opens in new window
  • Librarians Opens in new window
  • Researchers Opens in new window
  • Reviewers Opens in new window

About

  • About Emerald Opens in new window
  • Working for Emerald Opens in new window
  • Contact us Opens in new window
  • Publication Sitemap

Policies and information

  • Legal Opens in new window
  • Editorial policy Opens in new window & originality guidelines Opens in new window
  • Site policies
  • Modern Slavery Act Opens in new window

We’re listening — tell us what you think

  • Something didn’t work…

    Report bugs here

  • All feedback is valuable

    Please share your general feedback

  • Member of Emerald’s Library Advisory Network?

    You can start or join in a discussion here.
    If you’d like to know more about The Network, please email us

Join us on our journey

  • Platform update page

    Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

  • Frequently Asked Questions

    Your questions answered here