To read this content please select one of the options below:

A survey of consultant psychiatrists in intellectual disability based in England

Ashley Guinn (Policy Unit, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK)
Sujeet Jaydeokar (Department of Intellectual Disability, Barnet, Enfield, UK) (Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, Barnet, UK)
Jane McCarthy (Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK) (East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK)
Ashok Roy (Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK) (Faculty of Psychiatry of Intellectual Disability, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK)
Angela Hassiotis (Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK) (Camden Learning Disability Service and Camden and Islington Foundation Trust, London, UK)

Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities

ISSN: 2044-1282

Article publication date: 4 July 2016

194

Abstract

Purpose

Community mental health services are of increasing importance for people with an intellectual disability (ID), as the government aims to reduce the number of people treated within inpatient services. However, due to limited evidence base, it is unclear which service models are most effective for treating people with both ID and a mental health condition. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to carry out a survey in order to gain a better understanding of the current state of ID community services.

Design/methodology/approach

The survey was e-mailed to 310 consultant psychiatrists based in England and whose main specialism was in ID. In total, 65 consultants responded to the survey with 53 complete data sets.

Findings

In total, 84 per cent of consultants identified themselves as working in a generic community ID team. The majority of services were not integrated with social care (71 per cent). Regional differences were found. In contrast to the rest of England, the majority of services in London were integrated with social care. The Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for people with Learning Disabilities (HoNOS-LD) was found to be the most common outcome measure used by services. A range of interventions are widely available across services including psychological therapies and specialist memory assessments. The survey also provides evidence for increased decommissioning of specialist inpatient units and a need for more robust community services.

Research limitations/implications

Findings limited by low return rate (21 per cent) and because responses could not be matched to specific services. The implications of this survey are that there is still a variable level of integration with social care and that lack of integration could affect the quality of service. While HoNOS-LD is used consistently across services, there may be a need to supplement it with other outcome measures. There is a need for larger scale and higher quality studies in this area to strengthen the evidence base and therefore demonstrate the benefits of integration and specialisation more convincingly to health professionals and commissioners.

Originality/value

This survey presents an overview of the current state of community services for adults with ID in England. This information can be harnessed to add to revised approaches to mental health service models for people with ID.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by the Faculty of the Psychiatry of Intellectual Disability, Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2014-2015.The authors would like to thank the Consultants who responded to the survey, Kitti Kottasz for circulating the survey and the support of the Policy Unit of the Royal College of Psychiatrists.

Citation

Guinn, A., Jaydeokar, S., McCarthy, J., Roy, A. and Hassiotis, A. (2016), "A survey of consultant psychiatrists in intellectual disability based in England", Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 258-270. https://doi.org/10.1108/AMHID-03-2015-0012

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles