Conformal transformation of Douglas space of second kind with special (α, β)-metric

Rishabh Ranjan (Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, India)
P.N. Pandey (Department of Mathematics, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj, India)
Ajit Paul (Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, India)

Arab Journal of Mathematical Sciences

ISSN: 1319-5166

Article publication date: 31 December 2021

Issue publication date: 2 July 2024

803

Abstract

Purpose

In this paper, the authors prove that the Douglas space of second kind with a generalised form of special (α, β)-metric F, is conformally invariant.

Design/methodology/approach

For, the authors have used the notion of conformal transformation and Douglas space.

Findings

The authors found some results to show that the Douglas space of second kind with certain (α, β)-metrics such as Randers metric, first approximate Matsumoto metric along with some special (α, β)-metrics, is invariant under a conformal change.

Originality/value

The authors introduced Douglas space of second kind and established conditions under which it can be transformed to a Douglas space of second kind.

Keywords

Citation

Ranjan, R., Pandey, P.N. and Paul, A. (2024), "Conformal transformation of Douglas space of second kind with special (α, β)-metric", Arab Journal of Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 150-160. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJMS-08-2021-0189

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Rishabh Ranjan, P.N. Pandey and Ajit Paul

License

Published in the Arab Journal of Mathematical Sciences. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode


1. Introduction

A number of geometers have been studying Douglas space [1, 2] from different point of view. The theory of Finsler spaces more precisely Berwald spaces with an (α, β)-metric [3–5] have significant role to develop the Finsler geometry [6]. The concept of Douglas space of second kind with (α, β)-metric was first discussed by I. Y. Lee [7] in Finsler geometry. In [8], S. Bacso and Matsumoto developed the concept of Douglas space as an extension of Berwald space. In [9], S. Bacso and Szilagyi introduced the concept of weakly-Berwald space as another extension of Berwald space. In [10], M. S. Kneblman started working on the concept of conformal Finsler spaces and consequently, this notion was explored by M. Hashiguchi [11]. In [12, 13] Y. D. Lee and B.N. Prasad developed the conformally invariant tensorial quantities in a Finsler space with (α, β)-metric under conformal β-change.

In this paper, we prove that the Douglas space of second kind with generalised special (αβ)-metric is conformally invariant. In the consequence, we find some results to show that the Douglas space of second kind with certain (α, β)-metric such as Randers metric, first approximate Matsumoto metric and Finsler space with some generalised form of (α, β)-metric remains unchanged geometrically under a confomal transformation.

2. Preliminaries

A Finsler space Fn = (M, F(α, β)) is said to be with an (α, β)-metric if F(α, β) is a positively homogeneous function in α and β of degree 1, where α is Riemannian metric given by α2 = aij(x)yiyj and β = bi(x)yi is 1-form. The space Rn = (M, α) is called Riemannian space associated with Fn. We shall use the following symbols [6];

bi=airbr,b2=arsbrbs
2rij=bi|j+bj|i,2sij=bi|jbj|i
sji=airsrj,sj=brsjr

The Berwald connection

BΓ={Gjki(x,y),Gji}
of Fn plays an important role in this paper. Bjki denotes the difference tensor of Gjki and γjki that is
(1)Gjki(x,y)=γjki(x)+Bjki(x,y).

Using the subscript 0 and transvecting by yi, we get

(2)Gji=γ0ji+Bjiand2Gi=γ00i+2Bi,
and then Bji=̇jBi and Bjki=̇kBji. A Finsler space Fn of dimension n is called a Douglas space [14] if
(3)Dij=Gi(x,y)YiGj(x,y)yi,
are homogeneous polynomial of (yi) of degree three.

Next, differentiating (3) with respect to ym, we obtain the following definitions;

Definition 1.

([14]) A Finsler space Fn is a Douglas space of second kind if Dimi=(n+1)GiGmimyi is a two homogeneous polynomial in (yi).

On the other hand, a Finsler space with (α, β)-metric is a Douglas space of second kind if and only if

(4)Bmim=(n+1)BiBmmyi,
are homogeneous equation in (yi) of degree two, when Bmm is same as given in [14].

Furthermore, differentiating Eqn (4) with respect to yh, yj and yk, we obtain

(5)Bhjkmim=Bhjki=0.
Definition 2.

A Finsler space Fn with (α, β)-metric is known as Douglas space of second kind if Bmim=(n+1)BiBmmyi is a homogeneous polynomial in (yi) of degree two.

3. Douglas space of second kind with (α, β)-metric

Under this section, we discuss the criteria for a Finsler space with an (α, β)-metric to be a Douglas space of second kind [2].

The spray coefficient Gi(x, y) of Fn can be expressed as [4].

(6)2Gi=γ00i+2Bi
(7)Bi=αFβFαs0i+C*βFβαFyiαFααFαyiααbiβ,
where
C*=αβr00Fα2αs0Fβ2β2Fα+αγ2Fαα,
(8)γ2=b2α2β2.

Since γ00i=γjki(x)yjyk is hp(2), Eqn (7) yields

(9)Bij=αFβFαs0iyjs0jyi+α2FααβFαC*biyjbjyi.

By means of (3) and (9), we obtain the following lemma [14];

Lemma 1.

A Finsler space Fn with an (α, β)-metric is a Douglas space if and only if Bij = Biyj − Bjyi are hp(3).

Differentiating (9) with respect to yh, yk, yp and yq, we can have Dhkpqij=0 which are equivalent to Dhkpmim=(n+1)Dhkpi=0. Hence, a Finsler space Fn satisfying the condition Dhkpqij=0 is called Douglas space. Now, differentiating Eqn (9) with respect to ym and contracting m and j in the resulting equation, we get

(10)Bim=n+1αFβs0iFα+αn+1α2ΩFααbi+βγ2Ayir002Ω2α2n+1α2ΩFβFααbi+Byis0FαΩ2α3Fααyir0Ω
where Ω=β2Fα+αγ2Fαα, provided that Ω ≠ 0, A=αFαFααα+3FαFαα3αFαα2 and
(11)B=αβγ2FαFβFααα+β3γ2β2Fα4αγ2FααFβFαα+ΩFFαα

Following result is used in the succeeding section [7]:

Theorem 1.

A Finsler space Fn is a Douglas space if second kind if and only if Bmim are homogeneous polynomials in (ym) of degree two, where Bmim is given by Eqs (10) and (11), provided Ω ≠ 0.

4. Conformal change of Douglas space of second kind with (α, β)-metric

In this section, we find the criteria for a Douglas space of second kind to be conformally invariant.

Let Fn = (M, F) and F¯n=(M,F¯) be two Finsler spaces. Then Fn is called conformal to F¯n if we have a function σ(x) in each coordinate neighbourhood of Mn such that F¯(x,y)=eσF(x,y) and this transformation FF¯ is called conformal change.

A conformal change of (α, β)-metric is given as α,βα¯,β¯, where α¯=eσα, β¯=eσβ that is,

(12)a¯ij=e2σaij,b¯i=eσbi
(13)a¯ij=e2σaij,b¯i=eσbi
and b2=aijbibj=a¯ijb¯ib¯j

From Eqn (13), the Christoffel symbols are given by:

(14)γ¯jki=γjki+δjiσk+δkiσjσiajk,
Where, σj = jσ and σi = aijσj.

Using (13) and (14), we obtain the following identities:

¯jb¯i=eσjbi+ρaijσibj,
r¯ij=eσrij+ρaij12biσj+bjσi,
s¯ij=eσsij+12biσjbjσi,
s¯ji=eσsji+12biσjbjσi,
(15)s¯j=sj+12b2σjρbj,
Where, ρ = σrbr.

Using Eqs (14) and (15), we get easily the followings:

(16)γ¯00i=γ00i+2σ0yiα2σj,
(17)r¯00=eσr00+ρα2σ0β,
(18)s¯0i=eσs0i+12σs0biβσi,
(19)s¯0=s0+12σ0biρβ.

Now we obtain the conformal transformation of Bij given by Eqn (9).

Consider F¯(α,β)=eσF(α,β) then

(20)F¯α¯=Fα,F¯α¯α¯=eσFαα,F¯β¯=Fβ,γ¯2=e2αγ2

From Eqs (8), (19), (20) and using Theorem 3.1, we obtain

(21)C¯*=eσC*+D*,
Where,
(22)D*=αββα2σ0βFααb2σ0ρβFβ2β2Fα+αγ2Fαα

Hence Bij can be expressed as:

B¯ij=αFβFαs0iyjs0jyi+α2FααβFαC*biyjbjyi
+ασ0FβFα+α2FααβFαD*biyjbjyiαβFβ2Fασiyjσjyi,
=Bij+Cij,
Where,
Cij=ασ0FβFα+α2FααβFαD*biyjbjyiαβFβ2Fασiyjσjyi.

Using Eqn (11), we can have

(23)Ω¯=e2αΩ,A¯=eσA,B¯=e2αB.

Now, we use conformal transformation on Bmim and obtain

(24)B¯mim=Bmim+Kmim
Where, Kmim is given by [15, 16].
(25)2Kmim=n+1αFβFασ0biβσi+αn+1α2ΩFααbi+βγ2AyiΩ2ρα2σ0βα2n+1α2ΩFβFααbi+ByiFαΩ2b2σ0ρβ.

Therefore, we obtain the following result:

Theorem 2.

A Douglas space of second kind is conformally invariant if and only if Kmim(x) are homogeneous polynomial in (yi) of degree two.

5. Conformal change of Douglas space of second kind with special (α, β)-metric F=α+ϵβ+kβt+1αt

Consider a Finsler manifold with special (α, β)-metric defined as

F=α+ϵβ+kβt+1αt,
Where, ϵ and k are constant.

Then we obtain

Fα=1tkβt+1αt+1,
(26)Fβ=ϵ+k(t+1)βtαt,
Fαα=t(t+1)kβt+1αt+2
Fααα=6kβ2α4.

Therefore, using Eqn (11), we obtain

Ω=t(t+2)kβt+3+αtβ+b2t(t+1)αβtαβαt+1
(27)A=t(t+1)kβt+1αt+2(1t)2t(t+2)kβt+1αt+1
B=1+2+3
Where,
1=t(t+1)(t+2)kβt+2αt+2ϵ+k(t+1)βtαtϵnkβt+1αt+1t(t+1)k2β2t+1α2t+1b2α2β2,
2=t(t+1)kβt+2αt+2ϵ+k(t+1)βtαt3t(4t+7)βt+1αt+1b2α2+t(t+2)kβt+1αt+114β2,
3=t(t+1)kβt+2αt+2(αβ+εβ2)+t(t+1)βtαt(b2α2+εb2αβkβ2εkβ3α1)+βt+1αt+1(b2α2k2β2),

Hence, using Eqn (26), Kmim can be reduced as

(28)2Kmim=(n+1)αϵ+k(t+1)βtαt(σ0biβσi)+(αA1+αA2)(ρα2σ0β)B0+(B1+B2+B3)yiC1(b2σ0ρβ).
Where,
αA1=(n+1)t(t+1)kα2βt+1{αt+1β2+b2t(t+1)α2βt+1}t(t+2)kβt+3bi,
αA2=t(t+1)k(1t)αt+12t(t+2)kβt+2βtγ2{αt+1β+b2t(t+1)α2βt}t(t+2)kβt+22yi
B0=(n+1)t(t+1)kα4βt(εαt+k(t+1)βt)(αt+1tkβt+1)αt+1β+b2t(t+1)α2βtt(t+2)kβt+2bi
B1=t(t+1)(t+2)kα2βt+2ϵα2t+1+k(t+1)αt+1βtεtkαtβt+1t(t+1)k2β2t+1(αt+1tkβt+1)αt+1β2+b2t(t+1)α2βt+1t(t+2)kβt+32γ2,
B2=t(t+1)(t+2)kα2βt+2(εαt+k(t+1)βt)(αt+1tkβt+1)αt+1β2+b2t(t+1)α2βt+1t(t+2)kβt+323b2αt+3t(4t+7)kb2α2βt+14αt+1β2+4t(t+2)kβt+3.
B3=kt(t+1)(αβ)t+2(αt+1tkβt+1)αt+1β2+b2t(t+1)α2βt+1t(t+2)kβt+32αt+2β+ϵαt+1β2t(t+1)(b2α3βtkαβt+2)+(t(t+1)+ϵb2)α2βt+2(t(t+1)kϵ+k2)βt+3
C=t(t+1)kα2βt+1αt+1β2+b2t(t+1)α2βt+1t(t+2)kβt+3yi.

Now, Eqn (28) can also be written as

(29)2Kmim=(n+1)αε+k(t+1)(α1β)(σ0biβσi)+p1+p2+p3+p4+p5+p6+p7.
where,
p1=αA1(ρα2σ0β)
p2=αA2(ρα2σ0β)
p3=B0(b2σ0ρβ)
p4=B1yi(b2σ0ρβ)
p5=B2yi(b2σ0ρβ)
p6=B3yi(b2σ0ρβ)
p7=C(b2σ0ρβ)

showing that Kmim is homogeneous polynomial of degree 2 in yi.

Theorem 3.

A Douglas space of second kind with special (α, β)-metric F=α+ϵβ+kβt+1αt, where ϵ and k are constants, is conformally invariant.

With the help of Theorem 3 it can be proved that a Douglas space of second kind with a Finsler space of certain (α, β)-metric is conformally transformed to a Douglas space of second kind. In this way, one can have following possible cases;

  • Case(i). If ϵ = 1 and k = 0, we have F = α + β which is Randers metric. In case, 2Kmim occupies the form

    (30)2Kmim=n+1ασ0biβσi,
    Which shows Kmim is homogeneous polynomial in (yi) of degree two.

Note that in this case, p1 = p2 = p3 = p4 = p5 = p6 = p7 = 0.

Corollary 1.

A Douglas space of second kind with Randers metric F = α + β, is conformally invariant.

  • Case(ii). If ϵ = 0 and k = 1, we have F=α+βt+1αt. In this case 2Kmim obtains the form

(31)2Kmim=(n+1)(t+1)(α1β)α(σ0biβσi)+q1+q2+q3+q4+q5+q6+q7,
Where,
q1=(n+1)t(t+1)α2βt+1αt+1β2+b2t(t+1)α2βt+1t(t+2)kβt+3bi(σ0biβσi),
q2=t(t+1)(1t)αt+12t(t+2)βt+1βtγ2αt+1β+b2t(t+1)α2βtt(t+2)βt+22(ρα2σ0β),
q3=(n+1)t(t+1)2α4β2tbi(αt+1tβt+1)αt+1β+b2t(t+1)α2βtt(t+2)βt+2(b2σ0ρβ),
q4=t(t+1)2(t+2)α2β2t+2γ2αt+1β2+b2t(t+1)α2βt+1t(t+2)βt+32(b2σ0ρβ),
q5=t(t+1)2α2β2t+23b2αt+3t(4t+7)b2α2βt+14α2βt+1+4t(t+2)βt+3(αt+1tβt+1)αt+1β2+b2t(t+1)α2βt+1t(t+2)kβt+32yi(b2σ0ρβ),
q6=t(t+1)(αβ)t+2αt+2β+t(t+1){b2α3βt+α2βt+1αβt+2}βt+3(αt+1tβt+1)αt+1β2+b2t(t+1)α2βt+1t(t+2)kβt+32yi(b2σ0ρβ),
q7=t(t+1)α2βt+1αt+1β2+b2t(t+1)α2βt+1t(t+2)kβt+3yi(b2σ0ρβ),
Showing that Kmim is homogeneous polynomial in (yi) of degree 2.

Thus, we can have following;

Corollary 2.

A Douglas space of second kind with special (α, β)-metric F=α+βt+1αt is conformally transformed to a Douglas space of second kind.

  • Case(iii). If ϵ = 1 and k = 1, we obtain F=α+β+βt+1αt. In the case, 2Kmim occupies the form

(32)2Kmim=(n+1)1+(t+1)(α1β)α(σ0biβσi)+r1+r2+r3+r4+r5+r6+r7,
where,
r1=(n+1)t(t+1)α2βt+1αt+1β+b2t(t+1)α2βtt(t+2)βt+2bi(ρα2σ0β),
r2=t(t+1)(1t)αt+12t(t+2)βt+1βtγ2αt+1β+b2t(t+1)α2βtt(t+2)βt+22yi(ρα2σ0β),
r3=(n+1)t(t+1)α4βt(αt+(t+1)βt)bi(αt+1tβt+1)αt+1β+b2t(t+1)α2βtt(t+2)βt+2(b2σ0ρβ),
r4=t(t+1)(t+2)α2βt+2(α2t+1+(t+1)αt+1βttαtβt+1t(t+1)β2t+1)γ2(αt+1tβt+1)αt+1β2+b2t(t+1)α2βt+1t(t+2)βt+32yi(b2σ0ρβ),
r5=t(t+1)α2βt+2(αt+(t+1)βt)(αt+1tβt+1)αt+1β2+b2t(t+1)α2βt+1t(t+2)βt+323b2αt+3t(4t+7)b2α2βt+14αt+1β2+4t(t+2)βt+3yi(b2σ0ρβ),
r6=t(t+1)(αβ)t+2(αt+1tβt+1)αt+1β2+b2t(t+1)α2βt+1t(t+2)βt+32αt+2β+αt+1β2+t(t+1)(b2α3βtαβt+2)+(t2+1+b2)α2βt+1(t2+t+1)βt+3yi(b2σ0ρβ),
r7=t(t+1)α2βtαt+1β+b2t(t+1)α2βtt(t+2)βt+2yi(b2σ0ρβ).
Showing that Kmim is a homogeneous polynomial in (yi) of degree 2.

Thus, we obtain the following;

Corollary 3.

A Douglas space of second kind with special (α, β)-metric F=α+β+βt+1αt is conformally invariant.

  • Case(iv). If ϵ = 1, k = 1 and t = 1, we obtain F=α+β+β2α. Then, 2Kmim reduces in the form

(33)2Kmim=(n+1)1+2(α1β)α(σ0biβσi)+u1+u2+u3+u4+u5+u6+u7,
Where,
u1=2(n+1)α2β(1+2b2)α23β2biρα2σ0β,
u2=12βγ2(1+2b2)α23β22yiρα2σ0β,
u3=2(n+1)α4(α+2β)α2β2(1+2b2)α23β2bib2σ0ρβ,
u4=6α2(α3+2α2βαβ22β3)γ2βα2β2(1+2b2)α23β22yib2σ0ρβ,
u5=2α2(α+2β)βα2β2(1+2b2)α23β223b2α4(11b2+4)α2β2+12β4yib2σ0ρβ,
u6=2α3α2β2(1+2b2)α23β22(1+2b2)α3+(3+b2)α2βαβ23β3yib2σ0ρβ,
u7=2α2(1+2b2)α23β2yib2σ0ρβ.
Showing that Kmim is a homogeneous polynomial in (yi) of degree 2.

Thus, we can have the following;

Corollary 4.

A Douglas space of second kind with first approximate Matsumoto metric F=α+β+β2α is invariant under conformal change.

References

1.Antonelli PL, Ingarden RS, Matsumoto M. The theory of sprays and finsler space with application in physics and biology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Acad; 1993.

2.Narasimhamurthy SK, Ajith, Bagewadi CS. Conformal change of Douglas space of second kind with (α, β)-metric. J Math Anal. 2012; 3(2): 25-30.

3.Aikou T, Hashiguchi M, Yamauchi K. On Matsumoto's Finsler space with time measure. Rep Fac Sci Kagoshima Univ (Maths Phys Chem). 1990; 23: 1-12.

4.Matsumoto M. The Berwald connection of Finsler space with an (α, β)-metric. Tensor, NS. 1991; 50: 18-21.

5.Park HS, Lee IY. Park CK. Finsler space with general approximation Matsumoto metric. Indian J Pure Appl Math. 2003; 34(2): 59-77.

6.Matsumoto M. Theory of finsler space with (α, β)-metric. Rep Math Phys. 1992; 31: 43-83.

7.Lee IY. Douglas space of second kind with Matsumoto metric. J Chungcheong Math Soc. 2008; 21(2): 209-21.

8.Bacso S, Matsumoto M. On Finsler space of Douglas type, A generalization of the notion of Berwald spaces. Publ Math Debrecen. 1997; 51: 385-406.

9.Bacso S, Szilagyi B. On a weakly-Berwald space of Kropina type. Math Pannonica. 2002; 13: 91-95.

10.Kneblman MS. Conformal geometry of generalized metric spaces. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1929; 15: 376-79.

11.Hashiguchi M. On conformal transformation of Finsler metrics. J Math Kyoto Univ. 1976; 16: 25-50.

12.Lee YD. Conformal transformations of difference tensors of Finsler space with an (α, β)-metric. Comm Korean Math Soc. 1997; 12(4): 975-84.

13.Prasad BN, Gupta BN, Singh DD. On conformal transformation in Finsler space with an (α, β)-metric. Indian J Pure Appl Math. 1987; 18(4): 290-301.

14.Matsumoto M. Finsler spaces with (α, β)-metric of Douglas type. Tensor, NS. 1998; 60: 123-34.

15.Shanker G, Chaudhari D. On the conformal change of Douglas spaces of second kind with certain (α, β)-metric. Int J Pure Appl Math. 2015; 103(4): 613-24.

16.Baby SA, Shanker G. On the conformal change of Douglas spaces of second kind with special (α, β)-metric. AIP Conf Proc. 2020; 2261(1): 030011.

Further reading

17.Berwald L. On Cartan and Finsler geometries, III, Two dimensional Finsler spaces with rectilinear extremal. Ann Math. 1941; 42: 84-112.

18.Lee IY. On weakly-Berwald space with (α, β)-metric. Bull. Korean Math Soc. 2006; 43(2): 425-41.

Corresponding author

Rishabh Ranjan can be contacted at: ranjanrishabh196@gmail.com

Related articles