Astrophysicists on Twitter

Stefanie Haustein (École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l’information (EBSI), Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada)
Timothy D. Bowman (School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USA)
Kim Holmberg (School of Technology, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK)
Isabella Peters (Web Science Department, ZBW, CAU, Kiel, Germany)
Vincent Larivière (École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l’information (EBSI), Université de Montréal & Observatoire des Sciences et des Technologies (OST), Centre Interuniversitaire de Recherche sur la Science et la Technologie (CIRST), Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada)

Aslib Journal of Information Management

ISSN: 2050-3806

Publication date: 19 May 2014



The purpose of this paper is to analyze the tweeting behavior of 37 astrophysicists on Twitter and compares their tweeting behavior with their publication behavior and citation impact to show whether they tweet research-related topics or not.


Astrophysicists on Twitter are selected to compare their tweets with their publications from Web of Science. Different user groups are identified based on tweeting and publication frequency.


A moderate negative correlation (ρ=−0.339) is found between the number of publications and tweets per day, while retweet and citation rates do not correlate. The similarity between tweets and abstracts is very low (cos=0.081). User groups show different tweeting behavior such as retweeting and including hashtags, usernames and URLs.

Research limitations/implications

The study is limited in terms of the small set of astrophysicists. Results are not necessarily representative of the entire astrophysicist community on Twitter and they most certainly do not apply to scientists in general. Future research should apply the methods to a larger set of researchers and other scientific disciplines.

Practical implications

To a certain extent, this study helps to understand how researchers use Twitter. The results hint at the fact that impact on Twitter can neither be equated with nor replace traditional research impact metrics. However, tweets and other so-called altmetrics might be able to reflect other impact of scientists such as public outreach and science communication.


To the best of the knowledge, this is the first in-depth study comparing researchers’ tweeting activity and behavior with scientific publication output in terms of quantity, content and impact.



Haustein, S., Bowman, T., Holmberg, K., Peters, I. and Larivière, V. (2014), "Astrophysicists on Twitter ", Aslib Journal of Information Management, Vol. 66 No. 3, pp. 279-296.

Download as .RIS



Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2014, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.