To read this content please select one of the options below:

The pricing of community supported agriculture shares: evidence from New England

Thomas W. Sproul (Department of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, United States)
Jaclyn D. Kropp (Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States)
Kyle D. Barr (Department of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, United States)

Agricultural Finance Review

ISSN: 0002-1466

Article publication date: 7 September 2015

1007

Abstract

Purpose

Community supported agriculture (CSA) programs allow consumers to buy a share of a farm’s production while providing working capital and risk management benefits for farmers. Several different types of CSA arrangements have emerged in the market with terms varying in the degree to which consumers share in the farm’s risk. No-arbitrage principles of futures and options pricing suggest that CSA shares should be priced to reflect the degree of risk transfer. The paper aims to discuss these issues.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors evaluate the three most common share types using a cross-sectional data set of 226 CSA farms from New England to determine if there is empirical evidence in support of the theoretical price relationship between share types.

Findings

The degree of risk transfer from farmers to consumers has a significant effect on the share price. There are statistically significant returns to scale and higher prices for organics. Farm characteristics and product offerings predict which type of shares is offered for sale.

Research limitations/implications

The data set does not contain information pertaining to actual deliveries, expected deliveries, variance of expected deliveries, or covariance information; thus differences in share prices could be due to differences in these uncontrolled factors.

Originality/value

This paper provides empirical evidence that CSA share prices reflect the degree of risk transferred from the producer to the consumer. It also highlights challenges in conducting empirical work pertaining to CSA contracting.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

JEL Classification—Q13, Q14

The authors would like to thank the editor, Calum Turvey, and Brian Roe, Joseph Cooper, and Charles Moss for their insightful comments and suggestions on earlier drafts of this work. The authors would also like to thank the participants of the SCC-76 Economics and Management of Risk in Agriculture and Natural Resources annual meetings, the Agricultural Finance and Management sessions of the 2014 AAEA annual meetings, and the AAEA sessions of the 2015 ASSA annual meetings. Dr Sproul is grateful for financial support from USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch Project No. RI00H-108, Accession No. 229284 and USDA ERS Cooperative Research Agreement No. 58-3000-2-0063. Dr Kropp is grateful for financial support from USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Multistate Research Coordination, Southern Region Accession No. 1006135. An earlier version of this paper was presented in the Finance Section of the 2014 annual meeting of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Minneapolis Minnesota, July 27-29.

Citation

Sproul, T.W., Kropp, J.D. and Barr, K.D. (2015), "The pricing of community supported agriculture shares: evidence from New England", Agricultural Finance Review, Vol. 75 No. 3, pp. 313-329. https://doi.org/10.1108/AFR-04-2015-0020

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles