To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:

The accession of Latin American countries to the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: lessons from Brazil and Chile

Francisco Urdinez (Political Science Institute and Center for International Studies, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile)

Asian Education and Development Studies

ISSN: 2046-3162

Article publication date: 28 April 2020

Issue publication date: 18 June 2021

115

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the motivations behind the accession of Latin American countries to the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) with a focus on the cases of Brazil and Chile.

Design/methodology/approach

The author collected data using a case study methodology, primarily through semi-structured interviews with decision-makers and through official government documentation.

Findings

The findings identified that, overall, the Brazilian politicians who made the decision to join the bank had an unclear perception of its economic benefit and believed that the clearest benefit from accession is political (to support China's initiative). After years of domestic political turmoil and economic crisis, Brazil experienced delayed incorporation into the bank, slow ratification processes in the domestic arena and a reduction in its capital commitment. Chilean decision-makers, on the other hand, seemed to have a clearer idea of the benefits from accessing the bank, which explains that their ratification process has been faster and smoother. Yet, a surprising socio-political crisis delayed incorporation into the bank. Both countries have delayed their accession to the bank due to domestic crises.

Practical implications

Three policy implications can be drawn from this study. First, the entry of Latin American countries into the bank reflects the persuasiveness of Chinese diplomacy in this region. Second, the author finds that interviewees are not always able to differentiate the AIIB from the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and hold the misguided idea that the AIIB is subordinated to the BRI rather than complementary to it. This might set overly high expectations of the benefits of entering the AIIB. Third, the author foresees that the largest potential of the AIIB in Latin America lies in the possibility of participating in co-financed projects, in particular with the Inter-American Development Bank and the Development Bank of Latin America.

Originality/value

Research on the AIIB has boomed in recent years, yet there are few in-depth studies about Latin American prospective members. The value of this study lies in offering in-depth data for two of the eight prospective members from this region.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The author was very grateful to the interviewees who acceded to share the experience of accession to the AIIB. This work was supported by the project “The International Politics of China's Rising Role in Financing Infrastructure,” Fondecyt Iniciación grant 11180081.

Citation

Urdinez, F. (2021), "The accession of Latin American countries to the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: lessons from Brazil and Chile", Asian Education and Development Studies, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 374-385. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-08-2019-0128

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles