Conceptual design of a nonplanar wing airliner
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to compare three closed non-planar wing configurations with a reference conventional wing-plus-horizontal tail aircraft, considering structural aspects, weights and aerodynamic characteristics, as well as operational issues, such as cruise performance.
Design/methodology/approach
A vortex lattice code is used and coupled with an in-house code for structural beam calculation subroutine to evaluate the configurations as a function of the four main parameters identified in the study.
Findings
The study concludes that the non-planar wing configurations have better performances than a conventional aircraft. Moreover, the joined-wing configuration seems to be better than the others, including the box-wing configuration, achieving an increase of 17 per cent in the range for maximum payload compared to the reference aircraft and a 3 per cent reduction of maximum take-off weight.
Research limitations/implications
In the study, characteristic tools for a conceptual design are used, and, thus, absolute results should be considered with caution. Nonetheless, as all the cases are studied in the same way, there is a good precision in comparative or relative results.
Practical implications
The work shows that the non-planar wing configurations can be used as an alternative to the conventional aircraft to meet the objectives for the future of the aviation industry.
Social implications
Non-planar wing configurations are able to reduce fuel consumption. Their use could lead to reductions in pollutant emissions and the impact on the environment of commercial aviation.
Originality/value
This study considers aerodynamic and structural aspects at the same time, as well as several non-planar wing configurations, making possible to obtain a more realistic comparison between them.
Keywords
Citation
Garcia-Benitez, J., Cuerno-Rejado, C. and Gomez-Blanco, R. (2016), "Conceptual design of a nonplanar wing airliner", Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, Vol. 88 No. 4, pp. 561-571. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-11-2014-0204
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited