Abstract
Universitas Terbuka (UT) is a distance education institution that implements communication technology in various ways. In accordance with the implementation of this technology, UT uses both printed and non-printed materials designed as selflearning materials. These learning materials provide students not only with explanations of a subject but also with instructional learning purposes, examples, practices, summaries, formative tests, feedbacks, and learning instructions. Computer Assisted instruction (CAI) as a technology based learning material can be used as a supplement to the main learning material. For instance, Operation Research is mainly delivered to students through modules but it is completed by the CAI program. In order to improve the quality of the CAI program, an evaluation is needed, especially the evaluation that invites students' opinion. It is important to ask the students how the CAI program can help them comprehend a topic and which part of the program should be improved. The aim of this study is to figure out whether there are differences between students' expectation and students' perception toward the quality of the CAI program, namely the Operation Research. Some questionnaires were given to 41 respondents in Jakarta. Purposive sampling was chosen as a sampling technique with a criterion that each respondent has passed Operation Research Subject examination. From 30 questionnaires sent back and analyzed it can be concluded that there are some differences between students' expectation and students' perception toward the quality of the CAI program.
Keywords
Citation
Harsasi, M., Muzammil, M. and Riana, K.E. (2008), "DISTANCE STUDENTS' PERCEPTION ON THE QUALITY OF COMPUTER - ASSISTED INSTRUCTION PROGRAM IN OPERATION RESEARCH COURSE", Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 115-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-03-02-2008-B004
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2014 Emerald Group Publishing Limited
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License