To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:

Indonesian public sector accounting reforms: dialogic aspirations a step too far?

Harun Harun (School of Information Systems and Accounting, The University of Canberra, Bruce, Australia)
Karen Van-Peursem (Department of Accounting, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand)
Ian R.C Eggleton (School of Accounting and Commercial Law, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand)

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

ISSN: 0951-3574

Article publication date: 15 June 2015

Abstract

Purpose

Drawing from an interest in the changing Indonesian political and regulatory history, the purpose of this paper is to provide an understanding of the role that accounting reform can play in nurturing, or failing to nurture, a more dialogic form of accounting in a local Indonesian municipality.

Design/methodology/approach

To collect the data, the authors undertook a case study of a local municipality and drew from patterns found in Indonesia’s long colonial history. Data were acquired from official and publicly available documents and interviews with 29 key figures, including those involved in formulating and disseminating laws and also those affected by the accounting reforms from 1998 to 2009. Document collection and interviews were conducted at national and local levels.

Findings

This study shows that Indonesia has undertaken significant economic and political reforms for the intended purposes of fostering democracy, strengthening accountability, and creating transparency in relation to public sector practices. As part of these reforms, accrual accounting is now mandatory, independent audit is conducted, and disclosure is required by Government offices at central and local levels. Nonetheless, drawing from dialogic accounting principles, this study demonstrates the limitations of legislation and regulation in countering patterns that have long been laid down in history. Essentially, there is limited opportunity to question the elements of these reforms, and the study has also found that centralizing forces remain to serve vested interests. The root of the problem may lie in traditions of central control which have played out in how a dialogic form of accounting has failed to emerge from these important accounting reforms.

Research limitations/implications

The findings of this study should be understood from historical, political, and cultural backgrounds of the site of the study.

Practical implications

The implications of the findings should be taken into account by public sector policy makers, particularly in emerging economies – where political realities, economic, social, political, and cultural backgrounds set different historical patterns and result in unique circumstances that may tend to retain traditions of the past even under rules and regulations of the present.

Originality/value

A key contribution of this study is to show how the political traditions of a nation can permeate and divert the intent of, in this case, engaging a broader public in discourse about accounting reform in the public sector. In addition, this study also provides an understanding of public sector reform in the context of a diverse and unsettled nation which has been long subject to colonial, top-led, and military leadership. The findings demonstrate complexities and unintended outcomes that can emerge in public sector accounting reform and how, in this case, they appear to be influenced by historical traditions of centralized control.

Keywords

Citation

Harun, H., Van-Peursem, K. and Eggleton, I.R.C. (2015), "Indonesian public sector accounting reforms: dialogic aspirations a step too far?", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 28 No. 5, pp. 706-738. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2012-1182

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited