TY  - JOUR
AB  - Purpose Accounting practices vary not only across firms, but also across countries, reflecting the respective legal and cultural background. Attempts at harmonization therefore continue to be rebuffed. The purpose of this paper is to argue that different wordings in national laws, and different interpretations of similar wordings in national laws, can be explained by taking recourse to the philosophy of language, referring particularly to Searle and Wittgenstein.Design/methodology/approach The example of the substance over form principle, investigated in seven countries, is particularly suitable for this analysis. It is known in all accounting jurisdictions, but still has very different roots in different European countries, with European and international influences conflicting, which is reflected in the different wording of the principle from one country to the next, and the different socially constructed realities associated with those wordings.Findings This paper shows that, beyond accounting practices, the legal and cultural background of a country affects the wording of national law itself. The broad conclusion is that different socially constructed realities might tend to resist any attempt at harmonized socially constructed words.Originality/value The paper contributes to the debate surrounding the possible homogenization of accounting regulations, illustrating the theory of the social construction of both “reality” and “language” on the specific application of one common principle to various Member State environments.
VL  - 31
IS  - 7
SN  - 0951-3574
DO  - 10.1108/AAAJ-06-2017-2979
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2017-2979
AU  - Alexander David
AU  - de Brébisson Hélène
AU  - Circa Cristina
AU  - Eberhartinger Eva
AU  - Fasiello Roberta
AU  - Grottke Markus
AU  - Krasodomska Joanna
PY  - 2018
Y1  - 2018/01/01
TI  - Philosophy of language and accounting
T2  - Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
PB  - Emerald Publishing Limited
SP  - 1957
EP  - 1980
Y2  - 2024/04/16
ER  -