Books and journals Case studies Expert Briefings Open Access
Advanced search

Empathy, closeness, and distance in non-profit accountability

Ericka Costa (Department of Economics and Management, University of Trento, Trento, Italy)
Caterina Pesci (Department of Economics and Management, University of Trento, Trento, Italy)
Michele Andreaus (Department of Economics and Management, University of Trento, Trento, Italy)
Emanuele Taufer (Department of Economics and Management, University of Trento, Trento, Italy)

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

ISSN: 0951-3574

Publication date: 10 July 2018

Abstract

Purpose

Drawing on the phenomenological concepts of “empathy” and “communal emotions” developed by Edith Stein (1917, 1922), the purpose of this paper is to discuss the co-existence both of the legitimacy and accountability perspectives in voluntarily delivered social and environmental reporting (SER), based on different “levels of empathy” towards different stakeholders.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper adopts an interpretive research design, drawn from Stein’s concept of empathy by using a mixed-method approach. A manual content analysis was performed on 393 cooperative banks’ (CB) social and environmental reports from 2005 to 2013 in Italy, and 14 semi-structured interviews.

Findings

The results show that CBs voluntarily disclose information in different ways to different stakeholders. According to Stein, the phenomenological concept of empathy, and its understanding within institutions, allows us to interpret these multiple perspectives within a single social and environmental report. Therefore, when the process of acquiring knowledge in the CB–stakeholder relationship is complete and mentalised (level 3, re-enactive empathy), the SER holds high informative power, consistent with the accountability perspective; on the contrary, when this process is peripheral and perceptional (level 1, basic empathy), the SER tends to provide more self-assessment information, attempting to portray the bank in a positive light, which is consistent with the legitimacy perspective.

Originality/value

The concept of empathy introduced in this paper can assist in interpreting the interactions between an organisation and different stakeholders within the same social and environmental report. Moreover, the approach adopted in this paper considers different stakeholders simultaneously, thus responding to previous concerns regarding the lack of focus on multiple stakeholders.

Keywords

  • Empathy
  • Accountability
  • Legitimacy theory
  • Italian cooperative banks (CBs)
  • Social and environmental reporting (SER)

Acknowledgements

Comments received from colleagues at the 22nd UK CSEAR (Sept. 2010), 3rd Italian CSEAR (Sept. 2010), 8th Spanish CSEAR (July 2011), 23 th UK CSEAR (Sept. 2011), EAA (May 2013), Italian CSEAR (June 2016) and 29th UK CSEAR (Sept 2017) were extremely useful. The authors also thank the members of the Accounting Group of the Essex Business School for their thoughtful comments received during the seminar (October 2017). A special thanks goes to Teeroven Soobaroyen, Massimo Contrafatto, Carlos Larrinaga and Giovanna Michelon for their constructive comments on earlier version of this paper. The authors would also like to thank Dr Lucia Riolfi and Dr Federica Moro for her contributions to collecting the empirical data for this research. This research was supported by grant from the Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Trento e Rovereto and Euricse.

Citation

Costa, E., Pesci, C., Andreaus, M. and Taufer, E. (2018), "Empathy, closeness, and distance in non-profit accountability", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 224-254. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2014-1635

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited

Please note you do not have access to teaching notes

You may be able to access teaching notes by logging in via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
Login
If you think you should have access to this content, click the button to contact our support team.
Contact us

To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below

You may be able to access this content by logging in via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
Login
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.
Rent from Deepdyve
If you think you should have access to this content, click the button to contact our support team.
Contact us
Emerald Publishing
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
© 2021 Emerald Publishing Limited

Services

  • Authors Opens in new window
  • Editors Opens in new window
  • Librarians Opens in new window
  • Researchers Opens in new window
  • Reviewers Opens in new window

About

  • About Emerald Opens in new window
  • Working for Emerald Opens in new window
  • Contact us Opens in new window
  • Publication sitemap

Policies and information

  • Privacy notice
  • Site policies
  • Modern Slavery Act Opens in new window
  • Chair of Trustees governance statement Opens in new window
  • COVID-19 policy Opens in new window
Manage cookies

We’re listening — tell us what you think

  • Something didn’t work…

    Report bugs here

  • All feedback is valuable

    Please share your general feedback

  • Member of Emerald Engage?

    You can join in the discussion by joining the community or logging in here.
    You can also find out more about Emerald Engage.

Join us on our journey

  • Platform update page

    Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

  • Questions & More Information

    Answers to the most commonly asked questions here