To read this content please select one of the options below:

Which Commuters Will Car Share? An Examination of Alternative Approaches to Identifying Market Segments

Choice Modelling: The State-of-the-art and The State-of-practice

ISBN: 978-1-84950-772-1, eISBN: 978-1-84950-773-8

Publication date: 15 January 2010

Abstract

Interest in car-sharing initiatives, as a tool for improving transport network efficiency in urban areas and on interurban links, has grown in recent years. They have often been proposed as a more cost effective alternative to other modal shift and congestion relief initiatives, such as public transport or highway improvement schemes; however, with little implementation in practice, practitioners have only limited evidence for assessing their likely impacts.

This study reports the findings of a Stated Preference (SP) study aimed at understanding the value that car drivers put on car sharing as opposed to single occupancy trips. Following an initial pilot period, 673 responses were received from a web-based survey conducted in June 2008 amongst a representative sample of car driving commuters in Scotland.

An important methodological aspect of this study was the need to account for differences in behaviour to identify those market segments with the greatest propensity to car share. To this end, we estimated a range of choice model forms and compared the ability of each to consistently identify individual behaviours. More specifically, this included a comparison of:

  • Standard market segmentation approaches based on multinomial logit with attribute coefficients estimated by reported characteristics (e.g. age, income, etc.);

  • A two-stage mixed logit approach involving the estimation of random parameters logit models followed by an examination of individual respondent's choices to arrive at estimates of their parameters, conditional on know distributions across the population (following Revelt & Train, 1999); and

  • A latent-class model involving the specification of C classes of respondent, each with their own coefficients, and assigning each individual a probability that they belongs to a given class based upon their observed choices, socioeconomic characteristics and their reported attitudes.

As hypothesised, there are significant variations in tastes and preferences across market segments, particularly for household car ownership, gender, age group, interest in car pooling, current journey time and sharing with a stranger (as opposed to family member/friend). Comparing the sensitivity of demand to a change from a single occupancy to a car-sharing trip, it can be seen that the latter imposes a ‘penalty’ equivalent to 29.85 IVT minutes using the mixed logit structure and 26.68 IVT minutes for the multinomial specification. Segmenting this latter value according to the number of cars owner per household results in ‘penalties’ equivalent to 46.51 and 26.42 IVT minutes for one and two plus car owning households respectively.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the funding of Transport Scotland for the research. Thanks are also due to the support of colleagues, including Sekai Seawell, David Connolly and Annabel Eccles. The authors also thank two anonymous referees for comments on earlier versions of the paper.

Citation

Crockett, J., Whelan, G.A., Sinclair, C.L. and Gillies, H. (2010), "Which Commuters Will Car Share? An Examination of Alternative Approaches to Identifying Market Segments", Hess, S. and Daly, A. (Ed.) Choice Modelling: The State-of-the-art and The State-of-practice, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 421-443. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781849507738-019

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2010 Emerald Group Publishing Limited