Ways of Framing Safe Spaces

Abstract

This chapter provides foundations of differentiating the sophisticated and various theoretical approaches towards safe spaces demonstrated in this book. For the purpose of framing the examples provided in this collection, we offer three broad ways of thinking about safe spaces: safe learning spaces as separate, counterhegemonic, or third spaces; safe learning spaces of difference, sameness, and intersecting identities; and deliberative and democratic learning spaces. It needs to be noted, however, that these are not mutually exclusive but different aspects to consider and that they each operate within and across, and are therefore influenced by, the five levels of inequity discussed in Chapter 2. That said, not all levels of inequity are necessarily addressed by any given space, regardless of the frame used to interpret it. This discussion respects the multiple paradoxes in education, especially the one of pluralism and sameness, offering approaches to modes and learning settings of inclusion and exclusion and how they create different, yet “safe,” spaces.

Citation

Bramberger, A. and Winter, K. (2021), "Ways of Framing Safe Spaces", Winter, K. and Bramberger, A. (Ed.) Re-conceptualizing Safe Spaces, Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 33-50. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83982-250-620211006