To read this content please select one of the options below:

A Controversial Heritage: New Towns and the Problematic Legacy of Modernism

Lessons from British and French New Towns: Paradise Lost?

ISBN: 978-1-83909-431-6, eISBN: 978-1-83909-430-9

Publication date: 18 November 2020

Abstract

New Towns were exemplars of Utopian social and economic visions allied to Modernist ideas of design and architecture. Initially hailed as the answer to the ailments of the historic European city and the urgent need for housing after the War, they came under considerable scrutiny when the ideas of New Urbanism on design, density and community became one of the most vocal critics on Modernist town planning.

The UK Arts and Humanities Research Council recently funded a New Town Heritage Research Network Project. Drawing on case studies from the network, this chapter will refer to the original questions posed by the above-mentioned network project: How are the Utopian social and economic visions which accompanied the New Town Movement embodied in the masterplanning, urban design and architecture of the New Towns? How can the New Town architectural and urban design heritage be evaluated? How can future planning for these towns accommodate and build on this heritage in a meaningful way, and be integrated into regeneration and growth? How can key stakeholders in New Towns create an identity and pride for their town as well as a sense of belonging, by building cultural capital through their heritage, including architecture, public art and cultural activities?

This chapter will analyse how New Towns and their associated Modernist Heritage have been perceived by different audiences and are positioned in the overall heritage discourse including the question of a shared European Heritage.

Keywords

Citation

Schäbitz, S.C. (2020), "A Controversial Heritage: New Towns and the Problematic Legacy of Modernism", Fée, D., Colenutt, B. and Schäbitz, S.C. (Ed.) Lessons from British and French New Towns: Paradise Lost?, Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 197-213. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83909-430-920201014

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021 Emerald Publishing Limited