Theme 2 – Building Relationships, Building Structure: Working Together in Research on Out-of-school Learning

Abstract

This chapter discusses the different types of researcher/participant relationship described in the case study chapters, alongside the extent to which the projects were (and could be) pre-defined in terms of structure and expected outcomes. The case studies ranged from secondary data analysis methods with no researcher/participant contact, those with structured one-off interviews, those with more ongoing, but still researcher-led, relationships between researcher and participant, to more ethnographic and participatory research where relationships were negotiated between researcher and participant and, in some cases, led by the participants. This chapter highlights that researcher/participant relationships lie parallel to the structure of the project and the extent to which the outcomes are pre-defined. Despite the range of types of relationship, however, all the case studies highlighted the value of trust in those relationships, for participants to feel happy to share the details of their personal lives beyond that which is usually visible in the formal education setting of school. Edwards' (2017a) concepts of relational agency, relational expertise and common knowledge are used to help explain why these relationships matter in research on out-of-school learning – to understand activities that we do not know about, which take places in spaces that we are unfamiliar with.

Citation

Rose, J. and Todd, L. (2022), "Theme 2 – Building Relationships, Building Structure: Working Together in Research on Out-of-school Learning", Rose, J., Jay, T., Goodall, J., Mazzoli Smith, L. and Todd, L. (Ed.) Repositioning Out-of-School Learning (Emerald Studies in Out-of-School Learning), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 131-139. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-739-320211012