To read this content please select one of the options below:

Systems Thinking and System Dynamics Modeling

Arch G. Woodside (Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA)

Case Study Research

ISBN: 978-1-78560-461-4, eISBN: 978-1-78560-460-7

Publication date: 7 December 2016

Abstract

Synopsis

Chapter 16 is an introduction to systems thinking and analyzing the system dynamics of relationships within an organization or between organizations. Systems thinking builds on the propositions that (1) all variables or conditions have both dependent and independent relationships, (2) lag effects occur in relationships, (3) feedback relationships occur (e.g., A→B→C→A), and (4) seemingly minor relationships (i.e., “hidden demons”) have huge influence in causing a set of relationships (i.e., a system) to implode or explode. The propositions of building and testing a set of relationships apply in many contexts; this chapter examines systems thinking and system dynamics in one context as an introduction to this stream of case study research. Hall (1976) provides details of an advanced application of systems dynamics research – do not be fooled by the date of the study; Hall (1976) is an exceptional up-to-date case research study using system dynamics modeling. This chapter describes the issues and criticisms concerning golf, tourism, and the environment and considers how golf–tourism–environment relationships might achieve economic well-being for a region while avoiding vicious cycles of destruction to local environments and the quality of life of local residents. The examination proposes the use of systems thinking, cause mapping, and system dynamics modeling and simulations of golf, tourism, and environmental relationships to help achieve workable solutions agreeable to all stakeholders. Sustainable relationships that include golf, tourism, and environmental objectives require crafting government policies via stakeholder participation of all parties that such relationships affect – recognizing and enabling this requirement needs to be done explicitly – to reduce conflicts among stakeholders and avoid system failures.

Citation

Woodside, A.G. (2016), "Systems Thinking and System Dynamics Modeling", Case Study Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 353-367. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78560-461-420152029

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017 Emerald Group Publishing Limited