Subjective and Confirmatory Personal Introspection

Abstract

Synopsis

Research findings support the view that a multiple methods approach is necessary to surface the substantial amount of relevant thinking processes that occur both consciously and unconsciously within different phases of consumer decision making. Chapter 5 advocates viewing all studies that ask informants questions as representative of researcher–informant introspections. Because answers to questions differ substantially depending on how the questions are framed, applying multiple, explicit, question frames to acquire conscious and unconscious thoughts in researcher–informant introspections is helpful. This chapter reviews multiple methods, including metaphor elicitation of unconscious thinking, useful for achieving and confirming thick descriptions of conscious and unconscious thinking associated with informants’ deep-seated beliefs and observable actions.

Citation

Woodside, A.G. (2016), "Subjective and Confirmatory Personal Introspection", Case Study Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 107-127. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78560-461-420152018