Integrating corporate responsibility and sustainable development: A normative‐conceptual approach to holistic management thinking

Abstract

Purpose

For many years, the content and applicability of various forms of corporate responsibility (CR) for issues in the domain of sustainable development have been discussed within business and society. At times, both concepts are somehow connected to each other but so far they have not been put into a truly holistic and mutual perspective. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a normative concept integrating both aspects into holistic management thinking.

Design/methodology/approach

First, an interdisciplinary ethical reasoning for CR and sustainable development will be given based on the fundamental work of Kant, Rawls, Margalit and others. Based on these lines of thought, both concepts will be integrated into an advanced two‐stage approach of responsibilities to overcome possible shortcomings of an isolated analysis (and application) of either of the two.

Findings

The paper provides an initial normative ethical reasoning why CR and sustainable development should be integrated into holistic management thinking. It discusses CRs for an enabling framework of sustainable development on grounds of a two‐stage approach of integrative responsibilities.

Social implications

The paper will encourage thought leaders in business and society to integrate the goals of sustainable development into management thinking.

Originality/value

Instead of mutually advancing each other, sustainable development and CR so far have not been put into a truly holistic perspective, which potentially limits the significance of both concepts. The paper fills this gap and seeks to overcome these limitations. It offers an inclusive approach to management thinking which combines the micro perspective of businesses with the macro perspective of society.

Citation

Hahn, R. (2011), "Integrating corporate responsibility and sustainable development: A normative‐conceptual approach to holistic management thinking", Journal of Global Responsibility, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 8-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/20412561111128492