Overconfidence and debiasing in the financial industry

Markku Kaustia (Finance Department, Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland)
Milla Perttula (Accenture, Helsinki, Finland)

Review of Behavioral Finance

ISSN: 1940-5979

Publication date: 6 July 2012

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to measure overconfidence amongst finance professionals in domain relevant knowledge, and test for the impact of different debiasing methods.

Design/methodology/approach

The approach used was survey field experiments with varying debiasing attempts.

Findings

The subjects were overconfident in terms of probability calibration, better‐than‐average beliefs, and unfounded confidence. Debiasing attempts yielded mixed results. Explicit written warnings reduced better‐than‐average‐type of overconfidence. There was a further strong effect from attending lectures on investor psychology covering relevant examples. In contrast, there was only limited success in reducing miscalibration in probability assessments.

Research limitations/implications

Different types of overconfidence are distinct and respond differentially to debiasing. Future research on debiasing professional judgment should concentrate on testing in‐depth/personally engaging methods.

Practical implications

It is important for bankers to acknowledge the dangers of overconfidence. Correct confidence interval calibration is needed in order to have a sense of the risks involved in different asset allocation policies and trading strategies. Bankers should also be able to help their clients avoid overconfidence.

Social implications

Debiasing overconfidence in the finance industry likely carries public benefits. The results imply that this task is not easy, but not impossible either. The authors think further investment in this endeavor is justified.

Originality/value

Documenting an important judgment bias among finance professionals and estimating the effects of debiasing.

Keywords

Citation

Kaustia, M. and Perttula, M. (2012), "Overconfidence and debiasing in the financial industry", Review of Behavioral Finance, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 46-62. https://doi.org/10.1108/19405971211261100

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.