Critical management studies and “mainstream” organization science

Max Visser (Nijmegen School of Management, Institute of Management Research, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands)

International Journal of Organizational Analysis

ISSN: 1934-8835

Publication date: 12 October 2010

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to propose a rapprochement between the field of critical management studies (CMS) and what is constructed here as the “mainstream” of organization theory and research.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper contains a comparative analysis of relevant literature from the fields of organization theory, political science and political psychology.

Findings

It is found, first, that at least four instances of “mainstream” theory and research more or less share CMS assumptions; second, that CMS and “mainstream” may benefit from mutual contact (using the example of the “power elite” discussion in the 1950s and 1960s); third, that CMS and “mainstream” may benefit from “mainstream” operationalization of CMS‐concepts (using the example of the development of the F‐scale in the 1930s and 1940s).

Originality/value

The paper ranks among the first to search for convergences between two fields that seem firmly divided in both theoretical and institutional terms.

Keywords

Citation

Visser, M. (2010), "Critical management studies and “mainstream” organization science", International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 466-478. https://doi.org/10.1108/19348831011081912

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2010, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.