To read this content please select one of the options below:

Finite element analysis and comparison of laser shock peening and shot peening processes

Goran Ivetic (DIEM, II Faculty of Engineering, University of Bologna, Forlì, Italy)

International Journal of Structural Integrity

ISSN: 1757-9864

Article publication date: 31 May 2011

568

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this paper is to give a simple and accurate tool for prediction and comparison of residual stresses in laser shock peened and shot peen treated materials.

Design/methodology/approach

This work applies finite element code ABAQUS in order to compare the residual stress state and plastic deformation in specimens in aluminium alloy 7050‐T7451, treated with shot peening (SP) and laser shock peening (LSP) processes. Both processes are simulated using the Hugoniot elastic limit (HEL) of the material in question, and the processes are modelled using same input parameters (pressure on the surface of the specimen and the duration of contact between the material and the peening medium).

Findings

By using the same approach in both the analyses, a sound comparison of two technologies can be made, by comparing the obtained residual stress profiles. In addition, surface pressure and contact time can be varied easily in a parametric analysis, allowing the calibration of the numerical results.

Research limitations/implications

Owing to simplicity of used numerical models, different process parameters relative to SP process have not been taken in consideration directly, but through their effect on pressure on the surface of the specimen and the duration of contact between the material and the peening medium.

Originality/value

Application of HEL material model, usually applied to LSP problems, to the analysis of SP process gives promising results, in spite of simplicity of used numerical model.

Keywords

Citation

Ivetic, G. (2011), "Finite element analysis and comparison of laser shock peening and shot peening processes", International Journal of Structural Integrity, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 135-144. https://doi.org/10.1108/17579861111135897

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2011, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles