Books and journals Case studies Expert Briefings Open Access
Advanced search

The early experience of consultant psychiatrists in application of the Mental Capacity Act: issues for black and minority individuals

Ajit Shah (Ethnicity and Mental Health, Institute for Philosophy, Diversity and Mental Health, International School for Communities, Rights and Inclusion, University of Central Lancashire, Preston)
Natalie Banner (Institute for Philosophy, Diversity and Mental Health, International School for Communities, Rights and Inclusion, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK)
Karen Newbigging (Institute for Philosophy, Diversity and Mental Health, International School for Communities, Rights and Inclusion, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK)
Chris Heginbotham (Institute for Philosophy, Diversity and Mental Health, International School for Communities, Rights and Inclusion, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK)
Bill Fulford (Institute for Philosophy, Diversity and Mental Health, International School for Communities, Rights and Inclusion, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK)

Ethnicity and Inequalities in Health and Social Care

ISSN: 1757-0980

Publication date: 19 August 2009

Abstract

The Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) was fully implemented in October 2007 in England and Wales. This article reports on two similar, but separate, pilot questionnaire studies that examined the experience of consultants in old age psychiatry and consultants in other psychiatric specialities in the early implementation of the MCA pertaining to issues relevant to black and minority ethnic (BME) groups. Fifty‐two (27%) of the 196 consultants in old age psychiatry and 113 (12%) of the 955 consultants in other psychiatric specialities returned useable questionnaires. Eighty per cent or more of the consultants in old age psychiatry and consultants in other psychiatric specialities gave consideration to religion and culture and ethnicity in the assessment of decision‐making capacity (DMC). Almost 50% of the consultants in old age psychiatry reported that half or more of the patients lacking fluency in English or where English was not their first language received an assessment of DMC with the aid of an interpreter and 40% of the consultants in other psychiatric specialities reported that no such patients received an assessment of DMC with the aid of an interpreter.The low rate of using interpreters is of concern. The nature of the consideration and implementation of factors relevant to culture, ethnicity and religion in the application of the MCA and the precise reasons for the low rate of using interpreters in patients lacking fluency in English or English not being their first language require clarification in further studies.

Keywords

  • Mental Capacity Act
  • Black and minority individuals
  • Old age psychiatrists
  • Use of interpretors

Citation

Shah, A., Banner, N., Newbigging, K., Heginbotham, C. and Fulford, B. (2009), "The early experience of consultant psychiatrists in application of the Mental Capacity Act: issues for black and minority individuals", Ethnicity and Inequalities in Health and Social Care, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1108/17570980200900010

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2009, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you do not have access to teaching notes

You may be able to access teaching notes by logging in via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
Login
If you think you should have access to this content, click the button to contact our support team.
Contact us

To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below

You may be able to access this content by logging in via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
Login
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.
Rent from Deepdyve
If you think you should have access to this content, click the button to contact our support team.
Contact us
Emerald Publishing
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
© 2021 Emerald Publishing Limited

Services

  • Authors Opens in new window
  • Editors Opens in new window
  • Librarians Opens in new window
  • Researchers Opens in new window
  • Reviewers Opens in new window

About

  • About Emerald Opens in new window
  • Working for Emerald Opens in new window
  • Contact us Opens in new window
  • Publication sitemap

Policies and information

  • Privacy notice
  • Site policies
  • Modern Slavery Act Opens in new window
  • Chair of Trustees governance statement Opens in new window
  • COVID-19 policy Opens in new window
Manage cookies

We’re listening — tell us what you think

  • Something didn’t work…

    Report bugs here

  • All feedback is valuable

    Please share your general feedback

  • Member of Emerald Engage?

    You can join in the discussion by joining the community or logging in here.
    You can also find out more about Emerald Engage.

Join us on our journey

  • Platform update page

    Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

  • Questions & More Information

    Answers to the most commonly asked questions here