To read this content please select one of the options below:

Observing novel soil conditioners for carbon emissions mitigation

A.J.C. Coles (University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK)
K.A. Lewis (University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK)
R.E.H. Sims (Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand)

International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management

ISSN: 1756-8692

Article publication date: 2 March 2010

1273

Abstract

Purpose

The New Zealand (NZ) Government's commitment to a sustainable, low‐emissions energy future may be met, in part, by expanding bioenergy systems fuelled by short‐rotation forestry through utilising lower quality land affecting soil organic matter content and soil CO2 flux. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the carbon sequestration potential of a range of soil conditioners in order to minimise or offset carbon emissions due to ground disturbance.

Design/methodology/approach

Seven soil conditioners are evaluated using incubation chambers to measure the affect of their incorporation within three NZ soil types on soil respiration.

Findings

Charcoal is found to produce a distinct and significant carbon sequestering trend, as did newspaper and whey. Conversely, vegetable oil, paper mill pulp, biodiesel and methanol showed overall carbon emitting trends.

Research limitations/implications

The research is limited as only CO2 is monitored within the incubation chambers rather than the whole gaseous carbon profile. No microbial observations are conducted.

Practical implications

The investigation concludes that of the conditioners observed, charcoal, newspaper and whey warrant further observation as carbon sequestration soil conditioners.

Originality/value

The study forms part of the foundations within the development of soil conditioners specifically designed for carbon sequestration.

Keywords

Citation

Coles, A.J.C., Lewis, K.A. and Sims, R.E.H. (2010), "Observing novel soil conditioners for carbon emissions mitigation", International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 48-67. https://doi.org/10.1108/17568691011020256

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2010, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles